Cher Public

Theatrical Ligeti, Dramatically Realized (TL;DR)

New York PhilharmonicLook, this is a very special piece of music for me. You were twenty once, right? You were self-righteous. You had your musical heroes, and your mind was being remolded every fifteen minutes or so by a rapid succession of new experiences that challenged your notions of what music could do. 

So imagine me at twenty, dropping the György Ligeti Grand Macabre I’d just bought at Tower Records into my CD player and as this insane music, by one of the late 20th century’s greatest masters, comes stampeding out of my speakers, over my head a thought balloon should appear that says What in the hell is wrong with us that this has never been performed in the United States? 

Well, that was then. Pamela Rosenberg brought this crazy thing to the States, finally, and now Alan Gilbert has brought it to New York with projections and costumes and props—a “fully staged” performance, as the Phil started calling it as the program drew closer, or at least as fully staged as it is possible to do in Avery Fisher. It sold out! Everybody who was anybody went to see it! All your favorite blogospheroids were there Friday: I saw parterre’s own Squirrel and Maury there, and Pianist/blogger Jeremy Denk, who was perhaps doing a little homework for his forthcoming performances of Ligeti’s gonzo Piano Etudes.

And I, although I could hardly believe it, was there. So after spending a decade or so obsessing over the recording (the Sony recording. What, you think I’m gonna pay like $50 for the Wergo recording, if I already have a recording of the revised version? Sure I’m a Ligeti nerd, but I’m not THAT bad, YET) and after spending just a few days ruminating over my first-ever live experience of the opera, here is Danny‘s take on Le Grand Macabre.

First:  the score. The work is positioned at a transitional moment in Ligeti’s oeuvre, between his famous 60s textural experiments and the more rhythmically driven, more classically influenced works of his late period, and it not only sums up his musical language up to that point but introduces a few elements — parodies of classical as well as more demotic styles — that help make Le Grand Macabre rather more accessible than much of his work for the concert hall (these things being relative. I witnessed a few walkouts, and most of my own neighbors seemed to have disappeared after the intermission, although to be fair this was only a fraction of the otherwise steadfast, sold-out crowd).

But again, just about everything you’ve ever enjoyed about Ligeti’s music, if you’ve ever enjoyed Ligeti’s music, is on display here. To start with the vocal writing — Ligeti is one of those composers who in the late 20th century became fascinated by the gap between the “ideal performance” and the actual capabilities of human beings; some of the vocal lines are written in such a way to suggest that it’s less important to hear each 16th note of pitch content than it is to hear very good singers struggle very hard to keep up with the score. If the singers are great, it’s a stunning display of athleticism, and honey, the singers were great (more on this in a bit).

And then all of that gets chucked out the window in favor of eerie, luscious beauty, where the singers have to make an incredibly pure sound, like the overtones of distant bells, and the orchestra reaches into such high and low frequencies your ears start playing tricks on you. At those moments in the plot when the characters’ repetitive compulsions turn them into mindless clockwork automatons—repetitively tossing back cups of wine or chanting the praise of their political leaders—the music switches into yet another mode and recalls the gradual rhythmic processes of, say, Steve Reich, whom Ligeti admired (although he protested that he’d come to much the same conclusions as Reich on his own, at around the same time, without knowing his work).

I said “plot,” just now, and yes there is a plot! Ligeti recognized a trend among his colleagues to write “anti-operas,” I guess operas whose self-consciousness made them eat themselves up by the tail, and while he’d produced two efforts in that genre—his brief “comic strip operas” Aventures and Nouvelles Aventures, in which characters with no names spout gibberish and have nonsensical interactions—he wanted to write an “anti-anti-opera,” and I guess he succeeded? There are indeed characters in this opera, although they are barely recognizable as human; there is a sequence of events, although it might sometimes seem sketchy or arbitrary. The libretto was cowritten by a puppeteer, which gives us a clue as to how to read the libretto: as a sort of R-rated Punch & Judy show.

Beyond the puppet theater, the other looming influence on the story is Lewis Carroll, whose Alice in Wonderland was a lasting obsession of Ligeti’s—he set a bit of Carroll in the excellent Nonsense Madrigals, and though he died before beginning work on a long-planned Wonderland opera, there are vestiges of it in Le Grand Macabre, starting with the setting: the opera takes place in “Breughelland,” as if to suggest a Wonderland imagined by Breughel the Elder. But the outsider who wanders through this nightmarish landscape isn’t a precocious little girl, it’s Death himself, Nekrotzar, come to end the world. And instead of logical conundra it’s dick jokes.

Along the way, Nekrotzar encounters Amando and Amanda (a pair of narcissistic lovers, one a trousers-role, fucking in the graveyard), Piet the Pot (a drunkard), Astradamor (Royal Astronomer and CD/TV BDSM sub), and Astradamor’s abusive wife Mescalina (heh!), before saying take me to your leader and ending up in the farcical court of Prince Gogo, Breughelland’s ineffectual boy ruler. Nekrotzar there attempts to bring about the end of the world, but after a few toasts too many, misses his deadline, or fails, or else the rotten world just refuses to die — it’s not entirely clear — at any rate, it’s the end of the world as they know it, and everybody feels fine.

Somewhere in there, there’s an amazing hallucination of Venus, the planet and/or goddess, and a stammering coloratura secret police chief, and two corrupt ministers, and also three soldiers who probably could’ve been written out of the plot entirely and nobody would be the wiser.

Le Grand Macabre, like Dialogues des Carmelites (aren’t you curious to hear how this sentence will end?), was intended by the composer to be performed in the language of the audience, which in the age of Met Titles is maybe not the best idea, unless your audience is actually illiterate, because singing translations are the WORST. I’m guessing this policy of Ligeti’s results from the relatively disastrous premiere (in Sweden, for an international audience) of the original version, which was a Singspiel with spoken Swedish dialogue that to the assembled body of non-Swedes sounded like hurdy-hurdy-flurdy and nobody got the jokes.

Still, yikes: when the Amando of the English translation thinks he’s caught Piet peeping on his graveyard tryst with Amanda, he damns him with a “Stupid dickhead / Make your prick red!” which seriously people? That is so ugly and stupid and makes no sense and doesn’t even reflect the original German. And when the libretto is this gleefully stupid, you know I’m really saying something when I complain that the translation doesn’t do it justice.

Fortunately, the translation was revised for this performance (“Peeping prickhead / Stupid dickhead!” ran the offending lines, which at least makes some kind of sense), but the projections mystifyingly failed to include supertitles. To make up for it, the audience was handed a complete, handsomely printed complete libretto with the program—but the libretto was printed in white on black, totally unreadable in the dark. And with singing translations, you can barely tell what anyone is saying anyway, since duh they’re opera singers, and also they’re singing music that was designed to bring out the rhythms and inflections of a totally different language, and their syntax has been twisted into pretzels in order accommodate poetical meters totally hostile to English.

The projections were great, though! True to the piece’s origins, the production was created (by Doug Fitch and Giants Are Small) as a sort of puppet show, with miniature sets and images projected larger than life on a screen hanging above and behind the action. Think Méliès visits Pee-Wee’s Playhouse. The projections not only lent clarity to a staging obstructed by the presence of a massive symphony orchestra, they also offered moments of real wit—maybe more wit than the actual libretto. When Mescalina thinks she’s accidentally murdered her husband, for instance, she launches into a disingenuous, quasi-Baroque lament; on the screen above her, a disembodied puppet hand began hawking diamond rings on a cardboard-cutout home shopping channel, as if to suggest just how profound her sense of loss really is (not very!).

One of my friends complained that the work couldn’t be sold as a “fully staged” production if there was a full orchestra sharing the stage with them; I hesitate to complain, since there was a full stage with a trapdoor and all the props and costumes and elaborate business. The chorus, like the orchestra, was dressed in the solid black of a pit band, but when they were called upon to play a role in the drama, they moved and acted and interacted just as fully as if they had been costumed characters. Another of my friends complained that the production looked “cheap,” but I think that the shoestring quality of the visuals actually contributed to my enjoyment of them — as in any puppet show, part of the pleasure was seeing the variety of effects derived from limited means.

At any rate, it was totally necessary to present this piece with props and business. It would be irresponsibly dull to put on an opera so heavy on slapstick and sight gags in a concert version.

The costumes were cleverly conceived as well. Gepopo, head of the secret police, written as a truly demented trousers role for coloratura soprano — like Thomas Adès‘s depiction of Ariel in The Tempest, which it surely inspired — was instead portrayed as a malfunctioning lady cyborg, recalling Fritz Lang‘s Metropolis (with maybe a dash of Bart Sher‘s Contes d’Hoffmann?). Prince Gogo wore a spherical costume resembling an enormously magnified drop of milk, and his two battling Ministers (leaders from the Black and the White Parties — no no, they’re POLITICAL parties, not, you know) duked it out in top hats, tailcoats and boxing gloves.

But I disliked the style in which they and the other visual designs were executed, which for me recalled the Wonderland not of Carroll but of Tim Burton‘s ugly film. The obvious benchmark here is William Kentridge‘s Nose for the Met, which also made novel use of projected paper puppetry, but which exploded with delicious visual style. (At the time, our own Straussmonster pointed out a certain affinity between these two scores themselves, which I thought rather astute.) I loved it! Gesamtkunstwerk, baby.

These designs, on the other hand, turned out a little more like Julie Taymor‘s Magic Flute costumes — genius in concept, tacky onstage — than the visual elements from Kentridge’s production. Well y’know what, that was William Kentridge, so it’s already unfair, and now I’m gonna go out on a limb and guess that his production cost a LOT more than this one, so yeah, suck it up.

The singers’ dramatic performances were wholly committed, but seemed a little under-directed, so that once or twice it was unclear what exactly was going on (e.g. Venus’s appearance, or the lovers’ cemetery slapstick with Piet), and sloppy clowning is such a drag. Still, they did give their all, and their all was an awful lot.

It really seems impossible to summarize the outstanding achievements of a uniformly stellar cast. Mark Schowalter, as Piet, sang the unsingable, his part punctuated with atonal passagework and screaming and hiccuping and flights of falsetto, and he had to act drunk and get beaten up and then ridden like a horse across the stage. He never faltered.

Anthony Roth Costanzo, as Prince Gogo was outstanding, too. On the Sony disc, his part was sung by countertenor Derek Lee Ragin, that dependable ruiner of otherwise excellent John Eliot Gardiner recordings, and — not knowing much about singing, really, and especially not about the special challenges of writing for this voice type — I wondered whether it might just be impossible to sing the role with a bright and pleasant tone. I am delighted to report that it is not only possible to do so, it is furthermore possible to alternate between articulate delivery of complex quasi recit with lines of exquisite lyricism, and then follow it up with some hilarious clowning in extreme close-up. It would be too easy for Gogo, an essentially weak character, to turn into a sort of nothing onstage, but he remained a sympathetic presence, and managed to keep the audience’s attention when the emphasis of the action moved from the impending destruction of the world towards some not especially pointed political satire.

I knew Eric Owens mostly from his performance in Doctor Atomic, in which the bullying Gen. Groves’ grim eagerness to unleash destruction of cataclysmic proportions was humorously offset by his apparent inability to control his personal appetites. So, basically the same as Nekrotzar. Our first glimpse of him is a bona fide coup de theatre, his head popping out of the miniature set, projected to giant size on the screen overhead, to glower at the creepy love-couple from within the mouth of a tomb. (That glower was priceless; he and the production got a well-earned laugh.) He radiated presence in our last glimpse of him as well—a beaten man in shabby undergarments—and of course, even more so throughout the bulk of his performance, in Nekrotzar’s full, glorious raiments. (It seemed, especially compared to all of these lovely flourishes, a poor choice to have him walk on in what looked like street clothes; his presence was diminished, but not comically so. He just looked out of place.) Vocally, he thundered, bellowed, and crooned, fearsome and funny and lovely.

And then there were THE LADIES. Venus and Gepopo are both short, very high coloratura roles, so Audrey Elizabeth Luna learned them both just in case; she was the cover who ended up singing Venus, and her voice shined like the Moon, or like Venus, whichever pun you prefer, and she spent the whole time singing on stilts in a floor-length gown. Barbara Hannigan, as Gepopo, stunned the crowd with her combination of wild vocal acrobatics and stage hysterics—she actually descended into the audience, walking like a robot, waving a gun, and fired off a round or two. (Remember when I said they were “fully committed”? Yeah.)

But for me, the greatest source of dazzlement was still the orchestral writing. Having heard the piece a thousand times on record, the live experience was nevertheless something entirely new. The band was huge, including every imaginable species of contrabass whatever and percussive doodad, even (most notoriously) a full rank of old-fashioned carhorns that made the guy next to us jump as soon as the baton came down. (The battery of door buzzers for the second act, though, were obviously sampled. BOO!)

Ligeti, and Gilbert, fully exploited the space, utilizing offstage choruses and consorts at every corner of the house. When the time came for Nekrotzar to make his (mock-) grand entrance into the royal palace, he was followed by a pitiful band playing a demented march, and on the other side of the hall, a bass trumpet(!) played a sinister fanfare, and then the musicians onstage began to join in, and something happened that I didn’t expect at all: I was overwhelmed. I was stirred, elevated, by the enormous — grotesque — beauty of the experience. It’s been days now since the performance, and I’m still savoring the afterglow of this one moment. It was like nothing I had ever heard before. I want to see it again. May I see it again, please?

The applause at the opera’s close, if you’re wondering, went on forever.

That Le Grand Macabre has taken so long to reach the stage in New York City is a disgrace, and Alan Gilbert’s decision to put on a “fully staged” performance is a rebuke to the longstanding Manhattanite provincialism of Lincoln Center. True, it is the duty of American opera houses to nurture our native composers, but does that mean our audiences should remain ignorant of the music being made across the ocean? Do you remember the last time that the Met put on a new European opera? Why has New York never seen the ravishing operas of Berio or Messiaen? Saint François would certainly work very well in this kind of a presentation; I don’t think Un re in ascolto really needs a set, as long as it has singers and stage business.

But now I’m just playing fantasy baseball with the other operatic obsessions of twenty-year-old me. Cunning Little Vixen is scheduled to receive this treatment next season, and that seems like a great choice—an opera where people play woodland creatures is a perfect fit for a theatrical presentation that works just a little magic with problems of physical scale.

We all know that the Phil, much like every other arts institution in the country, is having money problems, and a show like this, even with three sold-out houses, is almost a recipe for red ink. But it’s thanks to shows like this that the Phil is accomplishing something under Alan Gilbert that it hasn’t managed in quite a long time: it’s positioning itself, once more, as an essential part of American cultural life.

  • brooklynpunk

    BRAVO..!!

    WHAT A WRITE-UP…..!!

    ..BUT… it made me that much sadder that I couldn’t swing getting to see this…grrrrr….

    ..BUT… looking forward…VERY MUCH… to the broadcast of it, this(? )week….

  • Henry Holland

    here is Danny’s take on Le Grand Macabre

    Your link goes to talk of Stravinsky’s dick and Dudamel porn, not a review of this concert.

    What, you think I’m gonna pay like $50 for the Wergo recording, if I already have a recording of the revised version? Sure I’m a Ligeti nerd, but I’m not THAT bad, YET

    Your loss, because IMNAAHO, the original is better, more biting and satirical, less smoothed out. I mean, Spermando and Clitora become Amando and Amanda among the changes, how boring. You can get the Wergo recording for $40 used on Amazon.

    Why has New York never seen the ravishing operas of Berio or Messiaen?

    Or Birtwistle or Pintscher or Reimann or……..

    To attempt an answer to your question, it’s because for all their inflated self-importance, New York City audiences are as conservative and risk-adverse as any midwest city. They want to bask in the glow of STARS, dammit, THE BIGGEST STARS ON THE PLANET, not be challenged or provoked.

    • Sorry! To be clear, I am Danny, that’s a link to my own personal dot com, and the review is not at the other end of that link, but in the two dozen paragraphs that come after it. That said, I do hope you enjoyed my steamy gay porn linxxx.

      The change to “Amando & Amanda” is an interesting one, I think—evoking, maybe, Tweedledee & Tweedledum as well as the more obvious allusion, Papageno & Papagena. They were “made for each other,” but not in a good way—in a slightly disgusting, bordering on incestuous, way. I described the looking-glass lovers as “narcissistic” advisedly. There are a series of double-images throughout the opera: the spider in the first half, Gepopo’s spider costume in the second; impotent authority figures Gogo and Astradamor, each restored to authority; the indistinguishable Black & White ministers; etc. Nekrotzar’s death scene is pointedly labeled as a “mirror canon.” That said, I do have a slightly larger CD budget than I did in college, so maybe I can find room on my shelf for a second Grand Macabre, now that I’ve got the taste back in my mouth…

      As for the trouble with New York, remember that Ligeti sold Avery Fisher Hall out three times over, so your presumption that its audiences are to blame might not be quite on target.

      • Also not for nothing, Spermando and Clitoria as character names focus rather bluntly on the physical. Amando and Amanda bring love nominally into the question.

      • Henry Holland

        I see, you were referring to yourself in the third person, like Dennis Hopper saying “Dennis Hopper’s performance in Apocalypse Now was brilliant”, got it.

        Fine, it sold out 3 performances, why did it take 32 (!!) years to be performed in the “cultural capital of the world” which New York City is constantly hyped as? I mean, it’ll only take 29 years for Saint Francois d’Assise to make it to the 212….

  • louannd

    It just makes me sick that you’re 20 and I’m not. That you saw this production and I didn’t.

    I enjoyed this write-up very very much. Is there a copy of the libretto (that you received in the program) on line somewhere? I would love to have in front of me for the broadcast.

    • Ah no no, I was twenty when I bought the CD at Tower Records—my twenties, like Tower, are a shrinking dot in the rearview.

      If you pick up a copy of the Sony recording, secondhand copies of which are available for too much money, the libretto included is nearly identical to the version in the Phil performance. As Seth pointed out, there’s also a print-on-demand pressing available from arkivmusic.com; “includes liner notes,” it says, which presumably means the libretto, tho of course I can’t guarantee it.

      That said, you’re right, they should totally make the libretto available for download! Let us send them helpful emails articulating this sentiment.

      • CruzSF

        Dan and louannd, I’ve purchased press-on-demand CDs from Arkiv and found that often “liner notes” include the basic list of musicians recorded, maybe a short essay, too. I’d double check before ordering to make sure the libretto is incuded if that’s important to you.

        • CruzSF

          Dan and louannd, to follow up on press-on-demand CDs from Arkiv: I just received my copy of Rossini’s Otello and yes, it does include a copy of the libretto. I know you made other arrangements for the LGM libretto, louannd, but just for future reference …

        • pernille

          Which recording of Otello did you get? I’m curious to hear what you think of the performance!

        • CruzSF

          It’s the Carreras/Von Stade/Pastine recording with Lopez Cobos conducting. I got as far as track 8 on the drive home, which means I heard the glorious duet with Iago and Rodrigo. Rossini sure knew how to combine men’s voices to make their beauty as natural as paradise. So far, I think it’s very clear, even while being distracted by driving and without the libretto. I can’t imagine how it ends though.

        • pernille

          There are two endings -- both written by Rossini -- ( he was MOST annoyed at having to provide a happy ending for the censor) -- you might enjoy the ancient ( 1940’s )film about Rossnini -( on DVD) where this episode is re-created.
          Sounds like the singing is terrific, may have to get yet another recording of this wonderful opera.

      • louannd

        Well that’s what I get for trying to read Parterre at work, not reading closely enough!

    • Straussmonster

      Dear louannd, please email me at my nom de guerre at gmail.com, and I might be able to get you a copy of the libretto in time for the broadcast.

      • louannd

        Straussmonster & Manou -- you guys rock!

      • louannd

        Straussmonster -- I believe the link that manou pointed out is the actual libretto provided at the performance, and so I will use that one! Thanks, again.

  • Will

    For the record, Alan Gilbert has said he intends to bring Messiaen’s St. Francois d’Assise to the Philharmonic in a similar staged performance in two seasons — Janacek’s Vixen next year, St Francois the year after.

  • BachBach

    If you were there on Friday night you heard Kiera Duffy sing the role of Venus, not Audrey Luna.

    • Thank you BachBach! It was hard for me to hear the pre-concert announcement, but I thought it said that Duffy would not be singing. Danny regrets the error.

  • m. croche

    This was a delight to read, both in style and substance.

    One idea: the performances of Le Grand Macabre have prompted many cris du coeur along the lines of “Why after X years hasn’t Y opera been done yet in city Z?” I would think the example of Janacek would teach us that sometimes it takes a long time for operas to catch on.

    I think it might be more enlightening if commenters selected an underserved opera and made a detailed case for its revival or transplantation on these shores. For example, there’s a good deal of agreement that bringing St. Francis to NY would be a great thing. Perhaps a critical appreciation of the opera on this site (along with counterpointing commentary) would not only inform the public, but encourage artistic directors.

    (Yes, this already happens informally on the site, but it might make a nice regular feature.)

  • derschatzgraber

    Regarding Venus -- on Thursday Keira Duffy was ill, but walked the part on the stilts while Audrey Luna sang. On Friday and Saturday Ms. Duffy sang as well.

  • operacat

    Saw the Friday performance and concur wholeheartedly with the great review!!! Even my partner who hates modern music (he thinks Berg’s divine Violin Concerto is monkey notes…love makes strange bedfellows!!!) enjoyed the performance immensely. He conceded it was the staging vs. the music. . .but even so. I definitely plan to get to NYC next year and the year after. Bravo to the New York Philharmonic.

    • operacat

      The staging and costumes really did add to the performance. When Prince GoGo in his tennisball outfit hid by sitting down and ducking his head into his costume, my partner and I almost bust a gut. I want to see this opera in other creative stagings!!!!

  • Alto

    Thanks for the review, Danny. Jeremy Denk was there on (at least) Thursday and Friday nights both, and I’m sure that you’re right about his reason. I saw a few people — him IMG types, etc. — who were there both nights.

    But, as for “sold out”: that is often just a marketing term. I can think of one of my many friends who was there on either night whom I’m pretty sure was paying. I sure wasn’t.