i wake up screaming

[Our Own Gualtier Malde (along with a few thousand other people) attended the public dress rehearsal of the Met's new production of La sonnambula this morning. Here is his report.]
Innocence, rustic naiveté and virginity just don’t get no respect no more. I should know, I grew up way out in central New Jersey and couldn’t get a date (a male one that is) at all in high school. I didn’t get no respect and sadly neither does Vincenzo Bellini and more importantly, Felice Romani these days, at least at the Metropolitan Opera.
These two men, one a poet in words, the other a poet in sound, deeply loved and respected the simple Tyrolean villagers in their opera semiseria La sonnambula a simple tale of love, marriage and misunderstanding. The creators of the current production of La sonnambula feel that the plot, characters, words and music are something that the audience must be distracted from lest their simplicity offend hipper-than-thou sensibilities.Â
The problem with this work since the end of the nineteenth century has been one of genre. Modern directors, critics and audiences understand tragic opera and comic opera but the sentimental genres in between have a tendency to be dismissed as flimsy and inconsequential. “Opera semiseria” is a genre that really got going with Paisiello’s Nina, ossia pazza per l’amore a proto-Romantic work that had a simple heroine in the country who went mad believing her lover had been killed but is restored to love and sanity in the end. It is a type of sentimental drama where we fall in love with the innocent heroine, watch her life and love imperiled by outside forces, weep over her sufferings and rejoice as she is restored to safety and the waiting arms of her lover – usually in a lovely pastoral setting.
All three of the Bel Canto titans had a great success in the genre – Rossini in La gazza ladra, Donizetti in Linda di Chamounix and Bellini in La sonnambula. Felice Romani was a respected man of letters whose poems are still read in Italian universities and his verses for La sonnambula have a tender early Romantic sensitivity – particularly the text of Amina’s arias which are delicate and full of imagery that evokes nature to illustrate her inner world.
Here is the director’s note for Mary Zimmerman’s production of La sonnambula verbatim from the program:
Mary Zimmerman’s new production is set in a contemporary rehearsal room where the cast is preparing a traditional production of La sonnambula, set in a Swiss village. In that rehearsal space, all of the events and relations of Bellini’s characters happen to the performers in their own real lives. (The one exception is the signing of the wedding contract, which is merely rehearsed as a fictional event in the opera.)
Amina and Elvino are played by two singers (also named Amina and Elvino), who are, like their fictional counterparts, lovers. The chorus constitutes the population of the Swiss village, and Lisa, the innkeeper of La sonnambula, is the stage manager.
There is a show curtain of a large reproduction of a nineteenth-century color print of the Swiss alps with a village but a pair of metal doors, scuffed and industrial, are set almost two thirds down right. Lisa with glasses and a notepad rushes through the doors and the scrim is pulled up to show a realistic modern loft rehearsal room with a stairs to the left and a door to the right surrounded by large floor to ceiling windows with a modern city buildings beyond. This is the one unit set for the opera. The change of scene is indicated by the setting being written on a large blackboard (“A Room at the Inn. Night”, etc.)
The entire cast is in modern rehearsal clothes, rehearsal skirts, sweatpants, jeans and pullovers etc. Dessay wears a smart black pantsuit number and Florez enters in jeans and leather jacket. Dessay enters in a smart white coat with a red muffler, mittens and cap talking on a cell phone. Immediately this creates a dissonance with the simple rustic heroine of Bellini’s and Romani’s drama. During her rapturous opening cavatina “Come per me sereno” where Amina wonders at the beauty of this day which seems colored by her love and happiness, Dessay was receiving a costume fitting and during the trills mimed being tickled by the wardrobe mistress and getting the giggles. She also tried out and rejected various shoes during the second verse and in the cabaletta “Sovra il sen” expressed disdain for several wigs (including one that I swear was the blonde braids that Angela Gheorghiu and Joseph Volpe fought over at the premiere of the Zeffirelli Carmen production).
The audience laughed and it was cleverly staged and superbly performed by the dexterous and agile leading lady. However, at what price was the cleverness achieved? This opening aria is supposed to make us fall in love with our heroine and wonder at her unspoiled innocence and radiance of soul. Instead we were laughing at a ditzy prima donna taking over a rehearsal. Enter Juan-Diego and we have a little backstage romance that blossoms after they run through the notary scene. It all seems to work fairly well and we almost seem to be in some kind of Woody Allen movie with neurotic actors stuck in a silly show and their neuroses played out against the corniness of the musical they are rehearsing.
The first scene is mainly character introduction and scene setting. However with the entrance of the errant Count Rodolfo (bass-baritone Michele Pertusi) the dramatic conceit started to unravel. Who is this man? He comes in with an entourage in a lovely camel hair or cashmere beige coat and seems to be a wealthy producer – maybe a movie executive or perhaps an ageing movie star or divo like Placido Domingo? Who is he? Why does he have to sleep in a rickety prop bed in the rehearsal studio? – can’t he get a room in a hotel or stay with friends? – the wealthy and powerful don’t have to rough it. Where does Amina sleep that she would wander into the rehearsal room late at night? Doesn’t she have her own apartment somewhere far away where Juan-Diego has an extra key and his own toothbrush in the bathroom? (I have kept a toothbrush for Juan-Diego in my bathroom for years and he doesn’t even know me and hasn’t even met me…)
Why is the chorus so furious at Natalie for having a one-night stand with Michele Pertusi – don’t they all read those singer’s chat rooms where all the sopranos and mezzos swear that though tenors are for romance, you want baritones and basses for sex? Don’t union rules forbid any of this nonsense from happening and wouldn’t all of them be fined for using rehearsal spaces as hotel rooms and then trashing them? At this point the framing device is actually obscuring the plot and making it less credible, not more so.
Dessay’s entrances as a sleepwalker are coups de theatre and I won’t spoil them for you. However, here is a taste of what happens in the last scene. Dessay is seen in a dangerous place sleepwalking and is guided into the room by Lisa. Amina bumps into the blackboard as the lovely instrumental introduction to the recitative leading into “Ah non credea mirarti” plays. Dessay turns over the blackboard and takes a piece of chalk and writes the word “ARIA” on it and the audience laughs before one of the most heart-stopping poignant arias in the bel canto repertory. The room darkens and the chorus disappears leaving Dessay to another coup de theatre that I won’t spoil.
With the aria over and the tenor and Teresa (Jane Bunnell) holding Amina in their arms, she awakens. The chorus all run on dressed in lederhosen and dirndls like refugees from Sound of Music. They throw a silly dress on Dessay and the green shoes she admired in the first scene with a flowered wreath on her head. Florez gets a doofy hat and some green suspenders and the set suddenly gets turned backwards showing that it is a mock-up. The jaunty, lilting introduction to “Ah, non giunge uman pensiero” starts up.
The dancers start doing a hoe-down landler type dance that is reminiscent of the disastrous movie adaptation of The Song of Norway with Florence Henderson and Edward G. Robinson. Dessay does a clunky rendition of this dance with the boys behind her during the first verse of the cabaletta. The whole thing looks seriously like “Springtime for Hitler” in the The Producers – Dessay just doesn’t have big pretzels stuck on her bodice. Dessay is lifted overhead by the male chorus as various formations dance around her. All of this is to tell us that this ecstatic piece of virtuoso writing and the Swiss setting are ridiculous and we can laugh at them and feel superior.
Bellini’s music is entirely without irony and totally sincere. It is reasonably well-served. Dessay’s voice is in good latter-day condition. She doesn’t attempt many very high or difficult cadenzas (her ornamentation of “Ah non giunge” is fairly restrained). That leaves a lot of lyrical singing in the middle and upper-middle register. Her coloratura is agile enough though as I said she is not ambitious with the fireworks. A few high notes do emerge as thready and the loud ones can be a pitched scream. But the basic sound is still attractive and fairly youthful in quality.
A bigger problem is her rather pointilistic vocal approach. Dessay has very strong vocal attacks immediately followed by a kind of diminuendo so the line is continually broken up. The phrasing is usually rather breathy and short-winded but when she attempts a long-breathed mezza voce legato line (not often enough) the voice can float hauntingly. Dessay and Florez both fail to synchronize or even attempt the unison trills in the “Son geloso” duet.
Florez’s slender and bright sound is also used rather punchily at times. Most of his high notes are attempted fairly loudly and brightly when a soft-floated voix mixte would be more romantic and stylish. Both leads needed to use the piano dynamic and contrast loud and soft phrases in their music. The nasality that can afflict Forez’s voice was seldom evident and he cuts a boyish, romantic and very natural figure onstage. He never loses his dignity no matter what happens around him.
Jennifer Black as Lisa has a dark, pliable tone that is more evenly produced and firmer than the prima donna’s. Pertusi has a handsome cantabile tone in his one big aria and solid throughout. Evelino Pido shapes the melodies lovingly and caters to the singer’s better instincts.
Mary Zimmerman did not take a bow at the end with her production team and there was no question and answer after the show. Peter Gelb in his opening comments said that not all operas have librettos that are the equal of their beautiful music and that Bellini’s La sonnambula was one of these. Mary Zimmerman’s framing device was an attempt to find a worthy substitute. Bellini’s music demands honesty and truthful expression and that was not what this production had in mind. — Gualtier Malde
” … would you expect the conductor to be able to hum every orchestral part in the entire score from memory?”
Pretty nearly. And the best conductors would be surprised that you evidently think such knowledge of the score unusual.
Seriously, some of the people on this board have really gone over the edge. We understand that as opera queens we are supposed to overlook a lot of awfully ridiculous libretti for the sake of great music but to suggest that the stupid/silly “Sonnambula” libretto can be compared to say, “Don Giovanni” or “Marriage of Figaro” is beyond ludicrous.
#156. So what exactly is bad about Romani’s libretto? Answer please using the libretto itself in your argument. What is wrong with the structure, the verses, the language, the situation, the exposition of character?
It is so facile to call these stories silly and flimsy. But exactly how silly and flimsy are they compared to other plot lines? What is so excessively serious and artistic about a plot that concerns a knight picking up a swan to pull his boat. Where did he get that swan? In Spain, and then it swam through the ocean to Brabant and up that river? Did he pick it up at the river? How is that not silly and flimsy. How is a plot about a one-eyed ego-maniac who has problems with his builders so much less silly and flimsy? Reduced to their elements any plot can sound silly, flimsy, or ridiculous.
But there is nothing silly per se about any of these plots, they deal with situations that cause reactions and emotions. Some of the themes and situations may be foreign to us because they are old-fashioned, obsolete, or from different cultural conventions. But that doesn’t make the theme itself silly. It is in the handling of these plots that the art lies. And I would really like anyone who is against Romani’s libretto to indicate using the libretto what exactly is so bad with it.
If this type of opera is not your thing so be it. But just because it isn’t your bag doesn’t make it bad; just not to your taste. People today seem to forget that. Everyone goes arounbd saying, “I don’t like it ergo it’s bad”. No, it just means you don’t like it.
sterlingkay: If every libretto is to be compared to Da Ponte at the top of his form, then very few librettos are going to come off well. That said, the second act of Don Giovanni is a mess dramatically no matter how you try to mix and match the various numbers following the Sextet.
Romani was not aiming for the kind of glittering high comedy (or high comedy/drama/tragedy/sui generis that Don Giovanni turned out to be). He was writing fairly straightforward stories with predictable endings that nevertheless “feel” honest in the theater. Characters do not behave inexplicably simply for the sake of novely (as, for example, some of the people in Trovatore do) and the poetry is charming and graceful.
Part of our problem in wrapping our heads around Sonnambula is that (as Gualtier points out) the genre to which it belongs has simply disappeared from our experience of drama. I think we expect the plot elements of Sonnambula to add up either to farce or melodrama, and so we’re confused when the piece is neither of these.
Which is not to say that I think Sonnambula ia an easy work to put on the stage, but I think there must be a way that doesn’t make fun of the piece.
>would you expect the conductor to be able to hum every orchestral part in the entire score from memory
Well Edoardo Mueller, who is hardly a slouch of a conductor at Juilliard, IU and San Diego to name but a few would say YES, the conductor should be able to hum every orchestral part in the entire score from memory. At least he said so back when dinosaurs roamed the earth around 1970. Best. Susie
Today’s ‘What the fuck!’ moment – the ‘Sonnambula’ banner
in front of the Met. Comments? Explanations?
I don’t understand why people put down Felice Romani. I think he was a wonderful poet. He was not a Circus impresario, but he turned down a job as court poet in Vienna to write opera librettos. He wrote ninety opera librettos, among them, Medea in Corinto, Aureliano in Palmira, Atar, Il Turco in Italia, La gioventu di Cesare, Gianni di Parigi, Il finto Stanislao, Il califo el a schiava, Bianca e Falliero, La sacerdotessa d’Irminsul, I due Figaro, Margherita d’Anjou, Atalia, L’esule di Granata, Chiara e Serafina, Amleto, Francesca da Rimini, Amina ovvero l’innocenza perseguitata, Il sonnambolo, I Capuleti e i Montecchi, Il pirata, La regina di Golconda, Colombo, La straniera, Zaira, Anna Bolena, La sonnambula, Norma, I normanni a Parigi, Ugo Conte di Parigi, L’elisir d’amore, Parisina, Beatrice di Tenda, Lucrezia Borgia, and Cristina di Svezia. Perhaps it would be an exaggeration to say he discovered Bellini, but he certainly helped guide him in his career. We are here two centuries later and not a week, perhaps not a day passes with some verse of Romani being uttered somewhere in the face of the earth. La sonnambula is a masterpiece. It might not present the atom bomb on stage, if that is what is higly regarded these days, but neither does it discuss the diet or the girth of some general. I really don’t understand what the problem is the pooh-bahs of the opera and theatrical world have with Bellini and Romani. Sure, I know Cirque du Soleil shows are very popular and make a lot of money -Las Vegas has at least five of them and one coming up with an Elvis theme- but it seems to me that is a different genre from opera. Perhaps I’m too old fashioned, but I don’t see the point of many productions of today, and I really don’t understand why a Bellini opera won’t be staged in a proper way. Wagner certainly liked Bellini, as did Rossini. Of course, people don’t have to like either Bellini, or Wagner, or Romani, or even Rossini, and for the sake of the economy the Met could be filled with clowns and aerialists and turned into a circus. But isn’t it better to go to Vegas for Cirque and to the Met for opera?
He wrote ninety librettos and the only one of those operas that ever see the light of day are the ones written by Donizetti and Bellini, because they have great music. His librettos are beside the point. They are not the reason those operas are popular.
And what do your snide remarks about Doctor Atomic have to do with Sonnambula, aside from the fact that they are both, in my opinion, opera with wonderful music and shitty librettos??
Neil Simon has written a lot of plays. Danielle Steele has written a lot of books. Doesn’t make either one of them a great writer.
I could sing Alessio tomorrow- it’s a question of color and tessitura.
I have to correct a word in the first sentence of my previous post from “people” to “people in charge of productions at the Met”, as Romani in truth is highly regarded. For many decades he was considered the best librettist of the time in Italy, and for opera lovers that is saying quite a lot.
My quest, thus, is to understand what is it that makes Doctor Atomic deserve a production that respects the work, and La Sonnambula not. In pondering this matter I wondered if perhaps some remarks about Teresa’s girth and an aria perhaps sung by Lisa with a Rachel Ray type recipe for Swiss chard sauteed in consomme and sprinkled with parmigiano reggiano might not gain some respect for La Sonnambula from the pooh-bahs at the Met. These lucubrations may be a waste of time on my part and in time, should Doctor Atomic become as popular and enduring as La Sonnambula, something that remains to be seen, we will be served a production of it at the Met with a beaded three-fingered clown during “Batter My Heart”, making fun of the trinity as the three-fingered-God.