Headshot of La Cieca

Cher Public

  • hawksmoor: I must thank Hippolyte, because as I recall, Hipp directed me to the scathing NYTimes review of... 11:51 PM
  • Simon Blackmouth: http://dictionary. reference.com/brow se/bathroom?s=t Call them what you will. They need to be... 11:25 PM
  • -Ed.: “Bloomberg on Gotterdammerung 221; I’m now considering having that chiseled onto my... 11:02 PM
  • papopera: Saw that when I was a young kid and even then found it inane. Typical Hollywood garbage. Did they eat... 8:49 PM
  • DonCarloFanatic: I am not familiar with the Schiller, although I have seen the play once, and it was in English.... 7:28 PM
  • DonCarloFanatic: I was just going to mention that the auto da fe music is the only happy music in this opera. No... 7:25 PM
  • oedipe: The slower increase of expenses, rather… 6:28 PM
  • oedipe: That’s what it looks like, Batty, but the net margin is still low (about 4%). Also, the net income... 6:08 PM

+ Comments feed

Eye rolling

by | 5:53 pm | Apr 22, 2012

It turns out we were wrong all along, cher public: the Robert Lepage production of the Ring at the Met is in fact a triumph, as Robert Lepage explains to us in (where else?) the New York Times. “And I would have gotten away with it too, if it weren’t for you meddling purists!” (Photo: Ken Howard)

Tags: , , , , ,
77 Comments