Headshot of La Cieca

Cher Public

  • quoth the maven: Um, there’s a bit of a difference between the operations of the Minnesota Opera and... 8:16 PM
  • thirdlady: i am not sure what you mean by “handsome,&# 8221; in terms of the visual aspects of the... 8:14 PM
  • oedipe: But see, I am not sure that in terms of box office the Carsen production was more successful than... 8:03 PM
  • Stendhal: Thanks – I’d like to follow your logic through. “the cost naturally increases... 8:02 PM
  • Cicciabella: Thank you for giving us your take on the matter, Kashania. I understand why you are pessimistic... 8:00 PM
  • steveac10: Mostly dead on and fairly dispassionate. On a second note – UNION USHERS?!!! In my college... 7:59 PM
  • Rowna: oops – i only put in 9 – well there are many others that could be retired for at least a... 7:57 PM
  • kashania: As a fan of the Carsen production, it wasn’t exactly at the top of my list of productions to... 7:46 PM
  • Batty Masetto: What about trying a different browser? It’s right there in both Safari and Firefox for... 7:36 PM
  • thirdlady: yes, true, and sorry! but regardless of the personal issues, i still don’t understand why... 7:32 PM

Put a Ring on

La Cieca (not pictured) was just leaked the information that the next planned revival of the Met’s Ring production (after next season) will be in the spring of 2017, i.e., about five years from now. That’s handy, because five years is the approximate lead time of casting big projects like these; the current crop of Wagnerians treading the Machine were selected circa 2007. A challenge for you, after the jump.

Based on your current knowledge of Wagner artists, cher public, your task is to come up with a cast and conductor for the 2017 Met Ring cycle. For any choices that might be deemed controversial or downright peculiar, La Cieca asks you to provide your rationale. YouTube clips are, as always, welcome.

127 comments