Regie is in the eye of the beholder

I really haven’t paid much attention to “opera regie,” so I can’t give you a firm definition of it. A while ago, a pithy and biting piece called “How to Opera Germanly” made the internet rounds, and it serves as a handy guide for we who are un- or under-initiated.
This production of Haydn’s Orlando Paladino, recorded for TV (on DVD, EuroArts 2057788) at the Staatsoper Unter der Linden, Berlin in May of 2009, lacks certain de rigueur regie elements: no one is lit from beneath while wearing pale makeup with dark shading, there are no inexplicably homo-erotic moments, no part of the set looks lethal to any inattentive singer.
Still, I did find myself asking questions that don’t normally spring to mind while watching most operas: “Is that supposed to be the Pope crawling out of the floor?” “Why is there a matador dressed in purple practicing cape flourishes upstage?” and “What do you suppose that bearded stewardess wandering around the forest represents?” It’s a bit of a shame that director/designer Nigel Lowery and director/choreographer Amir Hosseinpour (hmm, perhaps the doubled slashed titles should serve as a warning) chose to go the regie-lite route, because these questions kept distracting me from Haydn’s lovely music and some truly gorgeous singing.
Orlando Paladino is taken from the early epic poem by Aristo, Orlando furioso. Only one other composer would try after Haydn (Méhul, in 1799) : earlier, Caccini, Vivaldi, Lully and Handel all took turns adapting parts of the epic poem, with Handel’s three takes still performed regularly today. Haydn’s Orlando premiered in 1782 and was his most popular opera during his lifetime.
We don’t generally think of Haydn as an opera composer anymore, limiting his vocal contributions to The Seasons and The Creation, but he composed fourteen operas. It’s too bad Orlando isn’t better known: it contains some lovely solo and ensemble writing, and demonstrates Haydn’s mastery of orchestration. The Act I finale “Presto, rispondi, indegna” is almost Rossini-like in musical and dramatic structure, and I see why Haydn’s style was much admired by Mozart and Beethoven.
Still, by the time this opera premiered, Haydn, who all but invented the sonata allegro and what we’ve come to consider the “classical” symphony forms, was entering the later phase of his career. The London Symphonies were yet to come, but Mozart was pushing the envelope in musical form and theory (Figaro premiered only four years after Orlando.) Mozart also had a better eye for dramatic structure and pace, thus his libretti fare much better in contrast to Porta’s libretto here.
The plot, such as it is, concerns Orlando the Paladin, who, being driven insane by unrequited love, is searching for the object of his madness, Queen Angelica. She has run off to an uninhabited castle in the woods with her beloved Medoro. The Queen is obviously a babe, because Orlando is being pursued by Rodomonte, King of Barbaria, who is also infatuated with Angelica and trying to protect her from Orlando the madman. Off to the side, Orlando’s squire Pasquale is falling for a shepherdess, Eurilla, daughter of Licone.
Meanwhile, Angelica enlists the aid of the sorceress Alcina to help deliver her from Orlando. Alcina eventually banishes him to the Underworld, where Caronte enables all to end well by causing Orlando to forget all about Angelica. (Not quite the concise plotting of Beaumarchais, is it?) Along the way, the characters find themselves in a castle, a cave, the Underworld, and various grottos, gardens and forest clearings, settings mentioned in the libretto which the “director/whatevers” take as a mere suggestion.
Happily, this production features some truly lovely singing. Marlis Petersen sings Queen Angelica with a passion and clarity that made me long to hear her as the Countess, or perhaps Donna Elvira. She sings with voluptuous sound in the Act II aria “Aure chete,” tossing off top notes with ease, and demonstrating a fine command of phrasing and style. It’s too bad that during Angelica’s beautifully sung Act III aria “Dell’estreme sue voci dolenti,” the “director/whatevers” gave Petersen so much carefully choreographed gesturing to indicate how Orlando’s passionate pursuit was driving her to madness, that I kept yelling at the TV, “Oh for God’s sake, just put your hands in your pockets.”
Singing Eurilla, Sunhae Im starts out swallowing the sound slightly, but soon brings a clear, light soprano tone to the role. Her character opens the opera, but then Im doesn’t have much to do vocally outside of her Act II duetto with Pasquale, “Quel tuo visetto amabile,” which she sings with sweet phrasing, clean fioritura and attention to detail. (Pasquale has so little to sing in this duet that it is essentially an arietta for Eurilla.)
But as the sorceress Alcina, the Bulgarian soprano Alexandrina Pendatchanska really stands out. In her first aria, “Ad un guardo,” my immediate reaction after the first phrase was “What a great mezzo voice!” but as it turns out, Pendatchanska also sings Violetta, Gilda and the Queen of the Night. While she’s a soprano who’s not afraid to really dig into chest voice, her final aria “Ragion nell’alma siede” gives her a chance to show that she is a dramatic coloratura worthy of the name. She sings with fluidity, ease, and impeccable breath control. I listened to her first and last arias at least three times each, and waited for her every appearance in between.
The men suffer only slightly in comparison. Tenor Tom Randle as Orlando and bass-baritone Pietro Spagnoli as Rodomonte sing well. Randle has a tendency to push his top notes during runs ever so slightly so that they stand out and distract from the phrasing. The director/choreographer has him doing so much business in his first aria “D’Angelica il nome” that towards the end he’s obviously having to compensate for it in his phrasing and can’t sustain the longer lines. Spagnoli has a powerful baritone voice, and uses it well in his Act II opening aria “Mille lampi d’accesse faville.”
Victor Torres is a fine Pasquale. Although the score calls Pasquale a tenor, Torres is a baritone. Haydn gives the character a patter aria in Act I, “Ho viaggiato in Francia, in Spagna,” which strongly presages Leporello and “Madamina, il catatalgo è questo.” Torres delivers a fine comic performance with that, but in his Act II aria “Ecco spiano,” he shines with some truly fine singing. The aria requires him to run the gamut from low to high and back again, with strong technique in coloratura and vocal control. (It is a comment on the production that I originally thought this piece was a duet between Eurilla and Pasquale, because she joins him at odd moments in the coloratura, and sings along with the violins a few times during short orchestral sections. Only after more than one press of the rewind button did I come to the conclusion that Eurilla’s vocal business was interpolated and likely not in the score.)
Oddly, the roles of Licone, a tenor, and Caronte, a bass, are performed by one singer, Arttu Kataja, a baritone. He acquits himself well. Finally, as Medoro, Magnus Staveland does a journeyman’s job in a thankless role. There are no great demands placed on the tenor for this role, so I can’t say if it was the role or the performer that seemed lackluster. (Medoro reminded me of Don Ottavio: no matter how fine a tenor you put in that role, he doesn’t stand a chance against everyone else in Giovanni.)
Conductor René Jacobs specializes in period music, and it shows. I can’t say the orchestra overpowers the singers, because the sound is miked and balanced for the recording, but the singers don’t appear to be struggling to be heard over them. Jacobs keeps the tempos crisp and lively, and supports the singers well.
As for the production itself, well, there’s a mish-mash of costumes and periods: Orlando, being mad most of the time, wears something that looks suspiciously like a diaper. After Caronte causes him to forget Angelica, he shows up in a dress military uniform. Medoro and Angelica are dressed in timeless blacks and whites, Pasquale in a shapeless brown coat and shorts, Eurilla as a modern forest ranger, and Rodomonte as a Pirate from Penzance. Licone and Caronte, being performed by the same singer, are naturally performed in the same costume (a nightshirt and nightcap! Why?) It took a couple viewings of the first scene of Act III for me to realize I was watching Caronte and not Licone.
So too the sets are a mix of period styles and techniques. The opera starts with the singers in front of an impressionistic castle and forest backdrop that would not have been out of place in a high school production of, say, Robin Hood. This backdrop suddenly and inexplicably drops to the floor at Rodomonte’s entrance (five minutes into the opera) to reveal a solid, realistic depiction of the same castle and forest. Later scenes take place in settings from a realistic room in the castle, to a shimmery and watery Underworld, to a number of scenes played before the stage curtain.
To be fair, there were bits here and there I liked: when Angelica summons the sorceress Alcina in Act I, she appears by possessing the nameless handmaid who had been attending to Angelica, and Pendatchanska plays the moment particularly well. The first scene of Act III takes place in the Underworld, and it is effectively staged with nothing more than a backdrop, cool blue lighting, some mylar “snow” and a large piece of furniture reminiscent of a coffin. But then the rest of Act III, back in the forest, all takes place in the same Underworld setting, so I wondered why all the characters had gone to hell. As for the forest scenes, well, there wasn’t a plastic Christmas tree to be had for miles around the opera house.
I had some problems with the DVD in my Sony player. Some menu items, like audio settings, bounced me out of the DVD entirely and back to the player’s splash screen. I had the same problem on my Macbook Pro.
Very interesting and detailed review. I hope more reviews of non-Mozart Classical operas are forthcoming from you.
For the DVD in question, maybe it’s worth hearing through a stereo because the stage business sounds distracting.
You lost me at “there are no inexplicably homo-erotic moments”. Just kidding.
Ha. A production made for radio?
Petersen was absolutely lovely as Zdenka a few years ago. I am looking forward to hearing her Ophelia and Lulu this Spring. She will sing Susanna in LA next season. Norina in Chicago in 2012.
Do you know who else will be in the Don Pasquale in 2012?
no sorry nothing else about that.
fall of 2012 is the date of the Chicago Pasquale. I read an interview in Opernwelt and she comes across as someone who is intelligent. She tells about how her voice has changed and how she realized this after a Koenigin der Nacht at Bayerische Staatsoper. She was suppossed to debut in this role at the Met in the new production several years back and told them that she no longer can sing the role. She said she thought they would never ask her to sing there again but that they understood and then hired her for Adele after that. I guess that is one of the downsides of when houses schedule things years in advance and voices change. She also in the last two years or so cancelled a Zerbinetta because of this. I guess the singer is the one who is out of luck since most likely they cannot get anything else in that time period at such short notice (maybe 6 months). I think it was much better how they scheduled things in the past when they did one season only. Now I know they are booking singers for 2015 already and one soprano told me that she recently had an offer for Violetta but didn’t know if she could still sing the role in 5 years.
It’s Staatsoper unter den Linden, not “der”.
It’s “Ariosto”, not “Aristo”
Despite what wikipedia says, Ariosto’s operatic consequences did not end with Mehul. To cite one example, Mayr’s Ginevra di Scozia (1801) takes up some of the Ariodante material. Pushkin’s satiric-epic Ruslan and Ludmilla is unthinkable without Ariosto (and 19th century Russian opera is nearly unthinkable without Ruslan).
If “doubled slash titles should be a warning”, shall we also be suspicious of composer/librettist Richard Wagner, or composer/conductor Gustav Mahler.
Amen, m. croche! One of the great losses to opera was Herbert Wernicke, director, set and costume designer for the MET’s current Die Frau ohne Schatten. Director/designers are nothing new or frightening. The late Jean-Pierre Ponnelle and Harry Horner as well as Franco Zeffirelli all directed and designed at the MET — there are many other examples out there.
I have always felt that Ariosto’s influence may well have lasted a bit longer than the early 19th century. A great deal of Parsifal is set up in a manner very similar to the Ariosto tales that Handel, Haydn and others set in the Baroque period. The shape-shifting sorceress in the magic garden who lures Christian knights to their doom, her controlling sorcerer, the setting very close to the border between Muslim Spain and Christian Europe, the instant transformation from garden to desert — all this is familiar territory. Wagner obviously superimposed a major philosophical agenda on the material, but the bare bones of the plot are right out of Ariosto.
M. Croche:
Thanks for the info. I missed those typos when proofing. I was not familiar with Mayr’s version at all and Grout’s Short History of Opera 4th ed (which is what I used for research) mentions it only in passing with nothing about libretto or story. (Méhul is obvious, as he titled his version Ariodant.) Oddly enough, Wikipedia does mention that Ginevra di Scozia comes from Ariosto through Antonio Salvi (who is also absent from Grout!) Perhaps I should use Wikipedia as a source in the future.
I’m not really familiar with Pushkin’s poem, so I can’t speak to that, but I do know the opera by Glinka. If Pushkin was influenced by Orlando furioso, I can only take your word for it.
You don’t have to take my word for it that Pushkin was influenced by Orlando Furioso.
This is not hermetic knowledge. Every Pushkin scholar I know says the same thing,
“The models to which Ruslan and Lyudmila owes most are Ariosto’s Orlando Furioso (1532) – which Pushkin would have read in a French prose version – and Voltaire’s La Pucelle (1755), itself modelled on Ariosto, though Pushkin’s work is on a much smaller scale than its predecessors.” T.J. Binyon “Pushkin: A Biography”
or
“At the same time, critics very plausibly discerend kinship with products not simply identifiable with romanticism, such as Wieland’s three works on the theme of noble quests abandoned for the natural sensuous life, and his celebrated fairy-tale in very, Oberon; and of course, Ariosto’s mock-epic.” Walter Arndt, “Alexander Pushkin: Collected Narrative and Lyric Poetry.
Some of the Pushkin scholars I know think too much has been made of this.
LMM: Quite possible, especially since there was a trend in some Russian literary criticism to emphasize national sources and de-emphasize foreign ones. Got a cite?
Oh wow, I just looked it up—Ambroise Thomas wrote an Ariosto opera! I wonder what THAT’S like.
Dan, that I didn’t know!!
The only Haydn opera I know is his Armida (everyone seems to have written an opera based on this story). I must admit that I only got the recording because it featured Jessye Norman and I had heard about her great command of coloratura in the role. And I was surprised to hear her tossing off remarkably accurate coloratura — a skill that she didn’t have a chance to employ in any of her other roles.
Anyway, I was glad to hear the opera as it is full of Haydn’s usual wit and interesting writing. I must admit that I haven’t gone back to it in years but it is definitely worth a listen.
By the way, regarding: “We don’t generally think of Haydn as an opera composer anymore, limiting his vocal contributions to The Seasons and The Creation,”
I’m not sure who “we” is supposed to be, but I’d assume that anybody reasonably informed about Haydn would also recognize the magnificence of the masses he wrote for Nikolaus Esterhazy the second. These are well-represented on CD and wherever fine masses are performed.
INTERMISSION:
Barbara Cook and Keith Andes