Headshot of La Cieca

Cher Public

  • Lindoro Almaviva: Which Price? Leontine? Cause I have news for you about the last 20 or... 2:16 PM
  • Lindoro Almaviva: And so what? Artists make their choices. Where was Rossini at 60? Fat... 2:12 PM
  • Lindoro Almaviva: On completely unrelated news. Opera depot (http://www.ope radepot.co... 2:00 PM
  • Lindoro Almaviva: I worship the groud ATS walks in. For me she is a great example of how... 1:59 PM
  • luvtennis: When Sutherland was a mere lass of 60. Where was Cerquetti at that age? Not... 1:56 PM
  • luvtennis: Absolute rubbish if you are referring to Sutherland. She was greater musician... 1:45 PM
  • luvtennis: To which Anna TS replied to Gwyneth “Oh was that you singing, I thought... 1:40 PM
  • luvtennis: Sorry, but I must disagree. If you listen to Lehmann or Gadski it quickly... 1:28 PM
  • papopera: thats la Sutherland, isn’t she a pain though ? 1:14 PM
  • isepo: Well acc. to Robert Kraft, Stravinsky was continually revising Le sacre until the... 12:57 PM

Archives

Breaking! Alagnas still married!

alagna_updateAccording to an Angela Gheorghiu fansite (and what more reliable source could La Cieca ask?), the raven-tressed diva stated in an interview on Romanian television that she and current husband Roberto Alagna have no current plans to change their current matrimonial status.

Says Gheorghiu, with a straight face:

We have ups and downs. Roberto doesn’t want to divorce. I try to understand this…. I wanted [a divorce] at some point. Because of our job we don’t get to see each other for long time. During the last few years we parted more and more because of our repertoire. This was one of the main reasons. And there was also jealousy. My Romanian temper made me say “stop.” But he’s trying to give me the freedom I need in order to feel comfortable…. For the moment we won’t divorce. Peace of mind is very important for me. And he keeps telling me that we should move on to the next level of our relationship.

La Cieca is of course as mystified as you, cher public, as to what that “next level” might possibly involve, but… well, one can only hope.

UPITN/AP/PA Wire

Related:

37 comments

  • 11
    Harry says:

    In short: To pull up all the sanctimonious bullshit about ‘only heteros should be married’. ..just retort “Why should gays tax subsidize their privileged fucking,!”. Gays pay the same taxes, if not more: being single people.
    If the heteros ask how ? Answer…schools, maternity hospitals, child allowance endowments, support programs for marrieds, tax rebates for marrieds etc.