Headshot of La Cieca

Cher Public

  • oedipe: A present for you, Bobs’: Happy Memorial Day! http://upload.wiki media.org/wikipedi a/commons/thum... 4:52 AM
  • Nerva Nelli: “In Paris ist Revolution ausgebrochen!̶ 1; 4:26 AM
  • Marcello: Jonas Kaufmann has cancelled “Les Troyens” in London. 4:11 AM
  • MontyNostry: Like some kind of soul-diva boa constrictor, is La Holliday about the swallow that girl whole? 3:45 AM
  • Nerva Nelli: Aren’t you forgetting Jochen Kowalski as Nireno? http://s3.static69 .com/m/image-of... 3:34 AM
  • Nerva Nelli: Have not read an obit. No activity listed lately here http://www.filmref erence.com/film... 3:26 AM
  • bobsnsane: This B a uncommon crotch rocket, out among-st us men folk… 3:26 AM
  • bobsnsane: …we must call Doctor Hugh Jorgan immediately!” I’ll let u fine fellows finish the other... 3:20 AM

Cherry picking

lamico_fritz“Voglio essere giudicato per la musica e nient’altro che per la musica.”

“I want to be judged for my music and nothing but my music.” This phrase, which Mascagni himself wrote to his publisher Sonzogno, is the key to understanding the very essence and existence of L’amico Fritz (1891).

Cavalleria rusticana, Mascagni’s first performed opera, had premiered the previous year to astonishing success, and had instantly catapulted him to the top sphere of the musical world. Virtually overnight he had become a true international celebrity. Women swooned over his youth and good looks. Hordes of young men rushed to the barber to have the so-called “capelli alla Mascagni”, a sort of pompadour.

A good part of the intelligentsia was nonetheless trying to belittle the composer’s merits, ascribing most of Cavalleria’s triumph to its literary source, Giovanni Verga’s seminal and popular homonymous short novel, and later theatrical play. Consequently Mascagni, for his follow-up to Cavalleria rusticana, purposely set out to prove his talent by looking for a source of modest literary value.

Sonzogno suggested L’Ami Fritz, a sentimental novel by Emile Erckmann and Alexandre Chatrian, two French authors who specialized in stories taking place in their native Lorraine and nearby Alsace, and who found a vast readership among the French middle classes. It took five people, including the composer himself, to fashion a libretto Verdi did not hesitate to define “scemo”, a rather strong word meaning dumb, stupid. But that’s exactly what Mascagni was looking for: a silly plot unable to overshadow his music.

The story takes place in the Alsatian countryside in the mid 19th century. The protagonist is a wealthy landowner, Fritz Kobus, who is presented as a confirmed bachelor and misogynist at the beginning of the opera. During the course of three acts, thanks in part to the machinations of a matchmaker rabbi, he falls in love with Suzel, the teenaged daughter of his country estate manager; obviously, the girl secretly already loves him, and a happy end is assured.

The homey atmosphere, the bucolic nature of the story and the insubstantial plot contribute to temper Cavalleria’s energy and outburst, without repudiating the composer’s personality. Mascagni may have subdued Cavalleria’s extreme conflicts, but his ardent spirit is still simmering below the surface, and flashes of it erupt especially in the third act.

L’amico Fritz’s music is anything but conservative. It is on the contrary more audacious and daring than Cavalleria. The Preludietto to the first act, peppered with irksome parallel thirds and sixths, is already indicative of the diffused tonal ambiguity, and bold rhythmical and metrical fluctuation that permeates the whole score. Another example: Suzel’s ballade “Bel cavalier” is a mere two minutes of music where seven changes of keys are found in 57 measures, and the result is an undeniably unsettling feeling.

Immediately after the Cherry Duet, the music illustrating the arrival of the rabbi and Fritz’s friends in a carriage is an unmistakable and amusing parody of Alfio’s entrance in Cavalleria.

The opera received considerable popular and critical praise. The usually stern critic Hanslick found it a work of genius. Franchetti considered it more original than Cavalleria; Catalani was astonished at its musical unconventionality (always relative to the Italian opera of the time, obviously) and called some its tricks “diabolical”. Mahler saw it a progressive work and regularly directed it.

Audiences adored it. In Italy L’amico Fritz remained part of the standard repertoire of every opera house, at least until War World II. There was not a single lyric or di grazia tenor who did not consider it one of his war horses: Fernando De Lucia (who created it, opposite Emma Calvè as Suzel), Tito Schipa, Agostino Lazzari, Beniamino Gigli, Ferruccio Tagliavini, Cesare Valletti, all cherished the title role.

In the post-war period its performances dwindled. Tastes were changing, and after his death in 1945 at the age of 82, he, along with all his contemporaries, came to be regarded as relics of the past. There were political reasons as well. In 1932 he had become a member of the Fascist Party. Although there is evidence proving that he did it only out of convenience, he nevertheless allowed himself to be exploited by the Fascist propaganda as one of the most prominent symbols of “italianity.”

His last opera, Nerone, was widely perceived as a tribute to Fascist imperialism: the première was supposed to take place inside the Coliseum, but at the last moment this didn’t work and it was staged at La Scala. Even L’amico Fritz suffered a sort of censorship during Mussolini’s regime: after the racial laws were enforced, David the rabbi became simply “a doctor.” (Tagliavini in the 1941 recording conducted by Mascagni addresses David as “o buon dottore” instead of “o buon rabbino.”)

Mascagni’s operas, with the obvious exception of Cavalleria rusticana, were undeniably set aside in the new democratic climate. Even so, L’amico Fritz has never disappeared from the Italian opera houses. Smaller companies have especially been keen on staging it, because it is an inexpensive opera to produce. No costly sets are required, and it is easy to cast with young artists. In the rest of the world, on the other hand, it almost went the way of the Dodo.

Recording companies took very little interest in it. In addition to the 1941 Cetra release starring Tagliavini, his then wife Pia Tassinari and conducted by Mascagni himself, the only studio recording is the 1968 EMI edition with Luciano Pavarotti and Mirella Freni, with Gavazzeni on the podium. Other notable live recordings published on LP or CD include a 1951 performance from Naples, another “family affair” with a senior but still excellent Gigli (joined unfortunately by his daughter, the acidulous Rina); a 1953 Cetra live recording with Valletti and Rosanna Carteri and a 1963 performance from La Scala with Gianni Raimondi and Freni. In 2002 a DVD was released of a performance from Mascagni’s birthplace, Livorno, with Josè Bros and Dimitra Theodossiu. Of course there could be other live recordings of which I am not aware.

Excerpts of the opera, the Cherry Duet above all, have been regularly performed and recorded. The standards-bearer is still the one with Schipa and Favero but there are also a few oddballs, such as Cecilia Bartoli with Pavarotti, or Magda Olivero with Claudio Villa, the “reuccio” (or little king, by virtue of his diminutive height) of Italian melodic pop of the ‘50s.

Now Deutsche Grammophone is trying to fill the gap in L’amico Fritz’s scarce discography with this brand new recording, taped live in 2008 at the Deutsche Oper Berlin, starring Roberto Alagna and Angela Gheorghiu. The acclaimed duo has over the past decade embraced the cause for this work. Considering their highly publicized conjugal woes and impending divorce, it is ironic that their presumably last joint project involves an opera that is nothing but a crescendo towards the two protagonists’ marriage. As I hinted before, another famous operatic couple who had sung this opera very frequently, Tagliavini and Tassinari, also ended up in divorce.

I have some reservations about Alagna. The role of Fritz is not exceptionally demanding; its main difficulty consists in its lying on the passaggio, particularly in the third act, where the orchestra becomes louder. Here the French tenor demonstrates that he is still uncertain as to how to deal with those thorny notes between E and G above middle C. The F-sharp, perhaps the trickiest note in any tenor’s voice, is within the same aria (“O amore, o bella luce del cor”) resolved in several different ways: sometimes open and spread, sometimes covered, and sometimes (on the exposed phrase “possente ognor”) the tenor starts it covered and then opens it, to crude effect.

Although, as written, Fritz’s highest note is a B flat, Alagna joins Gheorghiu in an unwritten – for the tenor – high C in the third act duet (in hindsight, perhaps an attempt to upstage her, and overshadow the only chance she has in this opera to show off that money note?). Truth be told, that high C is a very good one indeed.

Mr. Alagna’s tone is grainy and lacks the sweetness that so much of his music requires. He doesn’t float his pianissimos with the same grace and ease of most of the tenors I have mentioned. Most of all, he is allergic to portamentos, which are essential in this repertoire, if used discreetly and tastefully. The Cherry Duet is in part marred by the relative shortage of his dynamic range, and especially by the falsetto (as opposed to a true pp mezza voce) he employs in the last few measures, on the upward linear interval G -G #- A. What’s more, in that very same spot, while Gheorghiu correctly sings “ah”, he utters a strange and funny vowel that sounds something like “ooh-ooh”, spoiling the magical effect.

As mentioned before, Suzel’s music touches the high C only once; on the contrary, her range is low for a soprano (for example, she has eleven low Ds to sing in the phrase “Mi commuove la musica”). Gheorghiu has a more Italianate voice than her partner; with her silky vibrato, she sings in a sort of old fashioned manner, which is part of her appeal. She tries very hard to become a simple country girl. Perhaps she tries too hard, because I sense a hint of artificiality in her interpretation: the grand diva who acts Suzel. In contrast, Freni, with her straightforwardness and naturalness is the naïve, unsophisticated girl.

Vocally Ms. Gheorghiu is sterling. The role presents no challenge for her. The high notes are bright, gleaming and penetrating, and her low register is firm and elegant because she does not try to enlarge it artificially. Furthermore, she respects all the dynamics required by the composer.

George Petean with his solid baritone makes the most of the impossibly irritating role of the rabbi. On the contrary, Laura Polverelli is disappointing as Beppe, a role en travestì. I had last heard her about a decade ago in bigger roles like Cenerentola, Rosina and Zerlina, and had appreciated her robust yet fluid mezzo-soprano. Here she sounds unsteady, unfocused and undistinguished.

The real surprise and biggest contribution to the success of this recording comes from conductor Alberto Veronesi. He avoids coating the narration with honey and molasses, undoubtedly the biggest risk in an opera of this kind, without doing away with the slightly melancholic dimension that constitutes the essence of this opera’s characters. The secret is to impart rhythmic freedom without losing the tight conciseness of the narrative. His task is made easier by the truly exquisite quality of The Orchestra of Deutsche Oper Berlin.

Veronesi is the artistic director of the Festival Pucciniano at Torre del Lago, where he has performed the composer’s complete canon. He demonstrates an evident affinity for this musical period. I look forward to his announced recordings of Giordano’s Fedora (with Gheorghiu and Placido Domingo substitiuting for Alagna), Leoncavallo’s La Bohème and especially Alfano’s Resurrezione.

As mentioned before, this is a live recording, capturing two concert performances that took place in September 2008 in Berlin; the quality of the sound is excellent, as if it had been recorded in a studio.

16 comments

  • What a wonderful review. I might need to buy this recording. I have the Tagliavini one.

  • poisonivy says:

    Great review. Makes me want to buy the recording as well.

  • Will says:

    I would welcome a serious exploration of the great mass of unknown Mascagni. He was once wildly popular. Fritz is a perfectly lovely opera–there may well be several more of his that would give delight if produced with good singers and the right conductor.

  • wenarto says:

    la cieca, although you are blind, this is a wonderful review, you have great ears…

  • Sanford says:

    Opera Depot has a live recording from 1966 with Franco Bonisolli and Gianna Galli.

    I’m curious why the parallel 3rds and 6ths are irksome. I’m not saying they’re not, but I’m curious.

    • Cocky Kurwenal says:

      I’m curious too Sanford – I’m not used to thinking of them as indicators of diffused tonal ambiguity, more indicators of ideal repertoire for Jackie and Joan.

  • Krunoslav says:

    Great review, but I am puzzled why any of the above posters woudl want to acquire this recording having read it. Save your pin money for Tagliavini/Tassinari or Pavarotti/Freni, both marvelous.

    Do we have any indications of what Suzel and Fritz’s religion is meant to be? “Estate manager” was after all not an infrequent profession for Jews in the late 19th century. And if they’re not Alsatian Jews, why are they getting marital advice from a rabbi? Since this occurred to me I haven’t had a chance to research it.

    • Ercole Farnese says:

      It’s interesting you bring up the “estate manager” thing. In the whole review it’s the word that has given me the most problems. In Italian Suzel’s father is a “fattore”. A fattore was basically the head peasant, the person in charge of supervising the country estate of a landowner: a peasant supervising other peasants. In some ways, although he wasn’t a serf, his bond with the landowner maintained a vestige of the master/serf relationship. This is very clear in the opera: when the rabbi tries to make Fritz jealous, he finds another bachelor for Suzel. Fritz however has the right to oppose or consent to this marriage, has the power of veto, so to speak.
      Obviously Suzel’s father is not just a country estate manager. I tried to use the English words factor, reeve, bailiff, but for one reason or the other they didn’t seem right; they were too archaic or confusing. So I settled on the very modern estate manager, fully aware it was not the exact translation of fattore.
      The libretto does not specifically state that Fritz and Suzel are Jews, but it is pretty obvious that they are: the rabbi is omnipresent, constantly preaching, quoting the Bible and moralizing. I am sure that the original novel was clearer about their religion, but I haven’t read it (who has, in the last 100 years?).
      The reason one might want to give this recording a chance is especially Alberto Veronesi, who in my view, gives a better reading than any other conductor, Gavazzeni included. Gheorghiu is also quite good. And for audiophiles this is the first digital recording after all.

  • Cocky Kurwenal says:

    Based on all the clips included in the posting, I think this essay/review is rather harsh on Alagna – he sounds to be in lovely voice and great form.

    It is so unfortunate that the forthcoming Fedora (an opera which merits and needs a strong studio/high quality live composite recording) now features Domingo. It isn’t the longest or most arduous tenor role, but even so, it is surely beyond his means these days and it isn’t as if he is under-represented in this piece, given the existence of a Met DVD and a La Scala live performance available on CD. It is also a piece that works fine with the age gap between soprano and tenor the other way around – if we can’t have Alagna, I’d much rather see Kaufmann, Beczala or a less often recorded, younger artist given the opportunity. As it is, the set will be problematic, and there still won’t be an all round good recording of Fedora that one can recommend without reservation.

  • tiger1dk says:

    Dear Cocky Kurwenal,

    How appropriate your name is – it does seem somewhat cocky to dismiss Domingo’s forthcoming Loris without having heard even one note of it or heard from anyone who have heard it. Of course, you might be right but making such categoric statements (such as “the set will be problematic, and there still won’t be an all round good recording of Fedora that one can recommend without reservation”) seems – as I said – cocky.

    Based on Domingo’s singing on the new Puccini CD, also conducted by Veronesi, I would think that Domingo will sound just fine – but, of course, I have no way of knowing.

    Tiger

    • Cocky Kurwenal says:

      You could call it cocky, but I think it stands up to objective reasoning – he was struggling with the role in the early 90s, and every indication based on his recent performances leads me to believe he’ll only struggle even more now.

  • Often admonished says:

    Great review! The opera itself gets the attention it deserves and we’re given a fair idea of the performance so we can decide to buy or not. Thanks.

  • Henry Holland says:

    Fedora (an opera which merits and needs a strong studio/high quality live composite recording)

    There is one, on Decca, with Olivero, Del Monaco, Gobbi; Landelli which is much better than the Sony Marton, Carreras; Patane set. There’s, of course, a bunch of pirates around.

    Mascagni was a very uneven composer, I’ve heard at least one recording of all of his operas. My favorite of his is Il Piccolo Marat, set during the French Revolution, which the Met considered doing with Domingo and Scotto, but they ended up doing the inferior IMO Francesca da Rimini instead.

    • queen amahelli says:

      Surely Mascagni was an incoherent composer. It all sounds like first thoughts slapped on paper without checking or tidying up afterwards. And his orchestration is chaotic. Sorry to disagree about ‘Marat’ but it’s so stop start – like someone with ADD – no ideas developed, or even coherently continued, and acres of arid bits. Francesca is immeasurably superior as a composition.

      Most promising in my book are Iris, which apparently can work (there was a Rome Opera production about 10 years ago with Jose Cura – not as Iris! – that was stunning) – Isabeau (a version of Lady Godiva) and Parisina – which is endless and static but has a sumptuous second act.

      I met Dame Eva Turner in her 90′s and she fondly remembered being coached by Maestro Mascagni in Isabeau and the gasps from the stunned audience when she rode across the stage slowly on horseback in a bodystocking during the famous intermezzo.

      • Ercole Farnese says:

        I completely agree. Il piccolo Marat is not a masterpiece. I saw it live a couple of times and didn’t impress me too much, but I have not given a look at the score, and very often I change my mind about an opera after I have had the change to study the score. Iris is in my opinion Mascagni’s best work. It’s an opera that should be present in every major opera house repertoire; a truly refined work, with three great roles (soprano bass and tenor). The orchestra and the chorus must be first-class too. Lodoletta is a lovely opera as well: not on the same level as Iris, but with the right soprano it could work nowadays too. Silvano is a blatant attempt to recapture Cavalleria’s success.

    • Cocky Kurwenal says:

      I was perfectly well aware of the Olivero/Del Monaco recording when I made that statement, thank you.