<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lock Up Raw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/</link>
	<description>where opera is king and you, the readers, are queens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 08:26:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: idreno</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106825</link>
		<dc:creator>idreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106825</guid>
		<description>..that is is NOT a brainchild of the MET only. Just as I&#039;ve said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..that is is NOT a brainchild of the MET only. Just as I&#8217;ve said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byrnham Woode</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106450</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrnham Woode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106450</guid>
		<description>All but one of the fine productions Orlando mentions were also revived for at least a second season.  The exception was the DOKTOR FAUST - and it&#039;s not too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All but one of the fine productions Orlando mentions were also revived for at least a second season.  The exception was the DOKTOR FAUST &#8211; and it&#8217;s not too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louannd</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106442</link>
		<dc:creator>louannd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106442</guid>
		<description>Any chance we will see another &quot;entirely new concept&quot; this season or next or just more of &quot;garage for singers?&quot; Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance we will see another &#8220;entirely new concept&#8221; this season or next or just more of &#8220;garage for singers?&#8221; Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louannd</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-2/#comment-106441</link>
		<dc:creator>louannd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106441</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a very interesting review; the discussion sparked by this review is also very interesting. I totally agree with the statement about Peter Mattei almost sounding too beautiful, especially if you&#039;ve seen the Gerd Grochowski performance a few times.  I am glad to read what you said about the orchestra because I noticed the same thing, but, that is, again, because I&#039;ve seen the DVD from Aix-en-Provence a number of times, though I really really enjoyed this production, only having listened to it on the broadcast.  I only wish I could go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a very interesting review; the discussion sparked by this review is also very interesting. I totally agree with the statement about Peter Mattei almost sounding too beautiful, especially if you&#8217;ve seen the Gerd Grochowski performance a few times.  I am glad to read what you said about the orchestra because I noticed the same thing, but, that is, again, because I&#8217;ve seen the DVD from Aix-en-Provence a number of times, though I really really enjoyed this production, only having listened to it on the broadcast.  I only wish I could go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandryka</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106438</link>
		<dc:creator>mandryka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106438</guid>
		<description>I would be very sad to see the Rosenkavalier replaced.  I have seen it countless times since 1969, and I love it.  It was especially good this year.  With the right cast and conductor, it can be as magical as it was with Leonie, Christa, Walter and Reri.  I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing the whole thing rebuilt and restaged -- even by Cheraux --  but I&#039;d hate to lose those familiar iconic images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be very sad to see the Rosenkavalier replaced.  I have seen it countless times since 1969, and I love it.  It was especially good this year.  With the right cast and conductor, it can be as magical as it was with Leonie, Christa, Walter and Reri.  I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing the whole thing rebuilt and restaged &#8212; even by Cheraux &#8212;  but I&#8217;d hate to lose those familiar iconic images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: operabitch</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106390</link>
		<dc:creator>operabitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106390</guid>
		<description>Just for the historical record. From the House of the Dead is NOT a &quot;co-commission between the MET and the Aix festival.&quot;

It was produced by the MET and the Vienna Festwochen -- they are the lead producers -- and the co-producers are Aix, the Holland Festival, and La Scala.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the historical record. From the House of the Dead is NOT a &#8220;co-commission between the MET and the Aix festival.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was produced by the MET and the Vienna Festwochen &#8212; they are the lead producers &#8212; and the co-producers are Aix, the Holland Festival, and La Scala.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squirrel</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106386</link>
		<dc:creator>squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106386</guid>
		<description>also, my editor (la c) said the exact same thing about that passage - I&#039;m a stubborn squirrel, alas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, my editor (la c) said the exact same thing about that passage &#8211; I&#8217;m a stubborn squirrel, alas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squirrel</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106385</link>
		<dc:creator>squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106385</guid>
		<description>Yeah, missed by the same who miss the Tosca. There&#039;s no big point about the Zeff Carmen that I was trying to make, more about the remaking of the core repertory (as opposed to the importing of new, unheard at the Met, works)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, missed by the same who miss the Tosca. There&#8217;s no big point about the Zeff Carmen that I was trying to make, more about the remaking of the core repertory (as opposed to the importing of new, unheard at the Met, works)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maury</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106384</link>
		<dc:creator>Maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106384</guid>
		<description>Oh, I was referring to &quot;missed by many.&quot;  And maybe it will.  Anyway, you&#039;re welcome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I was referring to &#8220;missed by many.&#8221;  And maybe it will.  Anyway, you&#8217;re welcome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squirrel</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106382</link>
		<dc:creator>squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106382</guid>
		<description>I called it &quot;familiar and effective&quot; not &quot;critically acclaimed&quot;, and the ladies in line at the Met gift shop actually do feel some fondness for the thing. 

otherwise, thanks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called it &#8220;familiar and effective&#8221; not &#8220;critically acclaimed&#8221;, and the ladies in line at the Met gift shop actually do feel some fondness for the thing. </p>
<p>otherwise, thanks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maury</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106379</link>
		<dc:creator>Maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106379</guid>
		<description>While I admire your review-writing, Herr Squirrel, I am compelled to wonder who you&#039;ve been talking to about the Zeff Carmen, as I don&#039;t know as I&#039;ve ever heard anyone say a kind word about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I admire your review-writing, Herr Squirrel, I am compelled to wonder who you&#8217;ve been talking to about the Zeff Carmen, as I don&#8217;t know as I&#8217;ve ever heard anyone say a kind word about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Often admonished</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106375</link>
		<dc:creator>Often admonished</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106375</guid>
		<description>Yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grimgerde2</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106371</link>
		<dc:creator>Grimgerde2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106371</guid>
		<description>Lovely review with really interesting points. I have only seen this work once in the theatre - many years ago - and the effect was shattering. What I find a real shame is that such an artistic event and triumph is not being made available as part of the HD broadcasts programme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely review with really interesting points. I have only seen this work once in the theatre &#8211; many years ago &#8211; and the effect was shattering. What I find a real shame is that such an artistic event and triumph is not being made available as part of the HD broadcasts programme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valmont</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106366</link>
		<dc:creator>Valmont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106366</guid>
		<description>One man&#039;s empty, meaningless spectacle is another man&#039;s night of beautiful music and fulfilling theatre.  Not everyone strives for a deep experience in the opera house.  Yes, we need auteurs, but many people enjoy and love the Zefferelli productions greatly, they have a place in their heart.  As long as the Met offers something to everyone, from theatrical novice to avant garde expert, I will be happy.

I loved the Alden Don Giovanni at NYCO, but don&#039;t we all have nights when we just want to see some magic on stage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One man&#8217;s empty, meaningless spectacle is another man&#8217;s night of beautiful music and fulfilling theatre.  Not everyone strives for a deep experience in the opera house.  Yes, we need auteurs, but many people enjoy and love the Zefferelli productions greatly, they have a place in their heart.  As long as the Met offers something to everyone, from theatrical novice to avant garde expert, I will be happy.</p>
<p>I loved the Alden Don Giovanni at NYCO, but don&#8217;t we all have nights when we just want to see some magic on stage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106362</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106362</guid>
		<description>I think we have to rethink the idea that a co-produced  or shared production somehow doesn&#039;t &quot;belong to&quot; or wasn&#039;t collaborated in by the MET.  First of all, given the tremendous expense of mounting productions these days, House of the Dead and other rare or non-standard repertory operas would be seen much less often than they are unless expenses are shared among two, three or more houses.  It&#039;s the way of the world these days and yet one more manifestation of just how interconnected everything is internationally these days.  

For myself, I don&#039;t care whether a production sits idle in containers in the MET&#039;s storage lot, or plays and stores in L.A. and Brussels between revivals at Lincoln Center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we have to rethink the idea that a co-produced  or shared production somehow doesn&#8217;t &#8220;belong to&#8221; or wasn&#8217;t collaborated in by the MET.  First of all, given the tremendous expense of mounting productions these days, House of the Dead and other rare or non-standard repertory operas would be seen much less often than they are unless expenses are shared among two, three or more houses.  It&#8217;s the way of the world these days and yet one more manifestation of just how interconnected everything is internationally these days.  </p>
<p>For myself, I don&#8217;t care whether a production sits idle in containers in the MET&#8217;s storage lot, or plays and stores in L.A. and Brussels between revivals at Lincoln Center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orlando Furioso</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106359</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlando Furioso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106359</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t think many savvy operagoers would weep if Rosenkavalier [were] replaced.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I would. (Oh, but I suppose that makes me not-savvy.) Not because I find it unimprovable, or think that it has weathered the decades in fresh form; but because any replacement is unlikely to be better (we could get lucky, I suppose), and given the frequency of the opera&#039;s return, it will pretty quickly look shabby and spottily rehearsed itself.

There has certainly been some precedent for carefully prepared new productions of fringe repertory at the Volpe-era Met, that played a relatively compact run with mostly unchanging cast. Wouldn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk, Makropulos, A Midsummer Night&#039;s Dream, Moses und Aron, Doktor Faust, The Gambler,&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Rodelinda&lt;/i&gt; fall into this category? (Allowing for a quibble over one or another of the titles.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t think many savvy operagoers would weep if Rosenkavalier [were] replaced.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would. (Oh, but I suppose that makes me not-savvy.) Not because I find it unimprovable, or think that it has weathered the decades in fresh form; but because any replacement is unlikely to be better (we could get lucky, I suppose), and given the frequency of the opera&#8217;s return, it will pretty quickly look shabby and spottily rehearsed itself.</p>
<p>There has certainly been some precedent for carefully prepared new productions of fringe repertory at the Volpe-era Met, that played a relatively compact run with mostly unchanging cast. Wouldn&#8217;t <i>Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk, Makropulos, A Midsummer Night&#8217;s Dream, Moses und Aron, Doktor Faust, The Gambler,</i> and <i>Rodelinda</i> fall into this category? (Allowing for a quibble over one or another of the titles.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Cieca</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106358</link>
		<dc:creator>La Cieca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106358</guid>
		<description>It is certainly possible to run a theater basically on the Met &quot;hybrid&quot; system (which amounts to a modified stagione plan rather than anything like true repertory) and still find time in the schedule for event programming like this &lt;I&gt;From the House of the Dead&lt;/I&gt;. In fact, this is how most of the big international houses do it: yearly revivals of the standard works in two or three blocks of performances (not sprinkled through the season as in true rep) and then several big events that are really done as a stagione, i.e., a run of 8 performances or so, then the production is shelved.

The only innovation here is that chez Volpe, the mindset of the Met was so focused on business as usual and butts in seats, nobody seriously questioned the questionable artistic standard of programming 12-15 performances of &lt;I&gt;Boheme&lt;/i&gt; every season to the neglect of other works. (Really in those days the only time the Met did anything out of the ordinary it was because Levine wanted the musical challenge, or, rarely, because a star singer had a pet project.)

&lt;I&gt;From the House of the Dead&lt;/i&gt; is not a vehicle for conductor or star; rather, it&#039;s a vehicle for the opera house and the audience. That&#039;s an entirely new concept, i.e., framing the Met as a showcase for genius instead of a garage for singers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly possible to run a theater basically on the Met &#8220;hybrid&#8221; system (which amounts to a modified stagione plan rather than anything like true repertory) and still find time in the schedule for event programming like this <i>From the House of the Dead</i>. In fact, this is how most of the big international houses do it: yearly revivals of the standard works in two or three blocks of performances (not sprinkled through the season as in true rep) and then several big events that are really done as a stagione, i.e., a run of 8 performances or so, then the production is shelved.</p>
<p>The only innovation here is that chez Volpe, the mindset of the Met was so focused on business as usual and butts in seats, nobody seriously questioned the questionable artistic standard of programming 12-15 performances of <i>Boheme</i> every season to the neglect of other works. (Really in those days the only time the Met did anything out of the ordinary it was because Levine wanted the musical challenge, or, rarely, because a star singer had a pet project.)</p>
<p><i>From the House of the Dead</i> is not a vehicle for conductor or star; rather, it&#8217;s a vehicle for the opera house and the audience. That&#8217;s an entirely new concept, i.e., framing the Met as a showcase for genius instead of a garage for singers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106356</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106356</guid>
		<description>This is assuming several things, two of which are the Met can afford such a switch (it can&#039;t,) and whether Gelb understands ensemble, stagione, or for that matter opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is assuming several things, two of which are the Met can afford such a switch (it can&#8217;t,) and whether Gelb understands ensemble, stagione, or for that matter opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106354</guid>
		<description>Wozzeck is another production that has lasted at the Met.  The production of Peter Grimes that preceded the current one, etc.  I think keeping this perspective in mind is good.  

The Met has done some staged non-standard (at least for its audiences) repertory in the past, and it may be FTHOTD is being overhyped partly because of the dissatisfaction with Tosca, Sonnambula, Lucia, among the dud productions of recent years.  

People went going crazy over Fille when it premiered, but it too was a shared production, and hardly in the same league as the 2006 Barbiere.

I can think of other productions, the old Frau, the 1971 Tristan, the Karajan/Schneider-Siemssen Walkure the previous Les Troyens, that were often praised to the skies when they premiered.  But as the decades rolled by, these productions lost much of their luster and many were happy to see them replaced.

I don&#039;t think many savvy operagoers would weep if Rosenkavalier replaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wozzeck is another production that has lasted at the Met.  The production of Peter Grimes that preceded the current one, etc.  I think keeping this perspective in mind is good.  </p>
<p>The Met has done some staged non-standard (at least for its audiences) repertory in the past, and it may be FTHOTD is being overhyped partly because of the dissatisfaction with Tosca, Sonnambula, Lucia, among the dud productions of recent years.  </p>
<p>People went going crazy over Fille when it premiered, but it too was a shared production, and hardly in the same league as the 2006 Barbiere.</p>
<p>I can think of other productions, the old Frau, the 1971 Tristan, the Karajan/Schneider-Siemssen Walkure the previous Les Troyens, that were often praised to the skies when they premiered.  But as the decades rolled by, these productions lost much of their luster and many were happy to see them replaced.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think many savvy operagoers would weep if Rosenkavalier replaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanothertenor</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106353</link>
		<dc:creator>justanothertenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106353</guid>
		<description>Ercole,
I have to disagree.  His persistent use of the stage elevator was exactly that: the whorish pandering to the tourist bus segment of the Met.  He wrecked the moods in both Tosca&#039;s and Traviata&#039;s third acts...  I can&#039;t forget, nor forgive, how upset I was at the audience applause in these quiet hushed moments...  It really ruined the act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ercole,<br />
I have to disagree.  His persistent use of the stage elevator was exactly that: the whorish pandering to the tourist bus segment of the Met.  He wrecked the moods in both Tosca&#8217;s and Traviata&#8217;s third acts&#8230;  I can&#8217;t forget, nor forgive, how upset I was at the audience applause in these quiet hushed moments&#8230;  It really ruined the act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanothertenor</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106352</link>
		<dc:creator>justanothertenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106352</guid>
		<description>Maybe &quot;great&quot; is meant as in &quot;enormous&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe &#8220;great&#8221; is meant as in &#8220;enormous&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ercole Farnese</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106351</link>
		<dc:creator>Ercole Farnese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106351</guid>
		<description>Provided that I am not a big Zeffirelli fan, I don&#039;t believe that he panders whorishly to the tourist bus segment of the Met&#039;s (or any other opera house) audience.  He truly believes in that hyper-realistic, hyper-detailed, hyper-everything type of production.  Sometimes (Falstaff, or his neo-realism Pagliacci)  he is more successful at it, but more often the results tend to be on the tacky side (like Carmen).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Provided that I am not a big Zeffirelli fan, I don&#8217;t believe that he panders whorishly to the tourist bus segment of the Met&#8217;s (or any other opera house) audience.  He truly believes in that hyper-realistic, hyper-detailed, hyper-everything type of production.  Sometimes (Falstaff, or his neo-realism Pagliacci)  he is more successful at it, but more often the results tend to be on the tacky side (like Carmen).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106349</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106349</guid>
		<description>There are two points in squirrel&#039;s review (a very fine one, let me say that going in) with which I will disagree.  Troublesome though John Dexter and his production period at the MET could be, Dialogs of the Carmelites, definitely fringe repertory at that point in MET history, became an iconic production that DID indeed define the best of the MET, strongly seconded by Billy Budd, Lulu, the Parade triple bill and the Stravinsky triple bill--all of them very much &quot;fringe.&quot;  And these productions held up through the decades and multiple revivals, people call for revivals of some of them to this day.  I know I&#039;d buy tickets to any of them in a heartbeat.

I will not mourn the loss of the Zeffirelli Carmen production with its gargantuan hanging lace tablecloths, Toreador Song staged as a glitzy musical comedy number, and the idiotic addition of a crazed young man repeatedly attacking a horse and rider from behind during the scene when the girls pour out of the factory for Carmen&#039;s arrest.  Zeffirelli pandered whorishly to the tourist bus segment of the MET&#039;s audience that reveled in empty, meaningless spectacle.

House of the Dead may well be just too prickly musically for a mass audience at the MET, but who knows?  A group of men carrying a toy eagle around the stage might just become as iconic an image as a group on women lying face down on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two points in squirrel&#8217;s review (a very fine one, let me say that going in) with which I will disagree.  Troublesome though John Dexter and his production period at the MET could be, Dialogs of the Carmelites, definitely fringe repertory at that point in MET history, became an iconic production that DID indeed define the best of the MET, strongly seconded by Billy Budd, Lulu, the Parade triple bill and the Stravinsky triple bill&#8211;all of them very much &#8220;fringe.&#8221;  And these productions held up through the decades and multiple revivals, people call for revivals of some of them to this day.  I know I&#8217;d buy tickets to any of them in a heartbeat.</p>
<p>I will not mourn the loss of the Zeffirelli Carmen production with its gargantuan hanging lace tablecloths, Toreador Song staged as a glitzy musical comedy number, and the idiotic addition of a crazed young man repeatedly attacking a horse and rider from behind during the scene when the girls pour out of the factory for Carmen&#8217;s arrest.  Zeffirelli pandered whorishly to the tourist bus segment of the MET&#8217;s audience that reveled in empty, meaningless spectacle.</p>
<p>House of the Dead may well be just too prickly musically for a mass audience at the MET, but who knows?  A group of men carrying a toy eagle around the stage might just become as iconic an image as a group on women lying face down on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Often admonished</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106347</link>
		<dc:creator>Often admonished</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106347</guid>
		<description>no. 2  Well we all know how open minded, flexible and adaptable the Met public is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no. 2  Well we all know how open minded, flexible and adaptable the Met public is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106343</guid>
		<description>After the Bayreuth &quot;Ring&quot; videos were released, I realized why Dame Gwyneth was so enthusiastic about Chereau&#039;s directing.  (She wasn&#039;t as enthusiastic about Peduzzi&#039;s buehnenbild.)  When I first saw the production in 1979, however, I didn&#039;t much care for it.

The Ring videos and the &quot;Queen Margot&quot; film convinced me Chereau is a superior director, who understands how people connect emotionally and physically and the elation and destructive outcome that can result from such bondings.

The reported six-week rehearsal at the Met period for FTHOTD obviously paid off and I&#039;m certainly looking forward to the 12/5 matinee. Squirrel&#039;s review is a good guide to what to look for in the production.  

As for other possible Chereau projects at the Met, I&#039;d love to see him direct a new &quot;Tannhaueser&quot;. Others who post here will doubless have different suggestions, but the main thing is to bring him back.  

Unlike some many of his director counterparts, Chereau&#039;s work is carefully considered, brimming with passion and integrity and though FTHOTD didn&#039;t originate at the Met, it apparently is a milestone in the company&#039;s history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Bayreuth &#8220;Ring&#8221; videos were released, I realized why Dame Gwyneth was so enthusiastic about Chereau&#8217;s directing.  (She wasn&#8217;t as enthusiastic about Peduzzi&#8217;s buehnenbild.)  When I first saw the production in 1979, however, I didn&#8217;t much care for it.</p>
<p>The Ring videos and the &#8220;Queen Margot&#8221; film convinced me Chereau is a superior director, who understands how people connect emotionally and physically and the elation and destructive outcome that can result from such bondings.</p>
<p>The reported six-week rehearsal at the Met period for FTHOTD obviously paid off and I&#8217;m certainly looking forward to the 12/5 matinee. Squirrel&#8217;s review is a good guide to what to look for in the production.  </p>
<p>As for other possible Chereau projects at the Met, I&#8217;d love to see him direct a new &#8220;Tannhaueser&#8221;. Others who post here will doubless have different suggestions, but the main thing is to bring him back.  </p>
<p>Unlike some many of his director counterparts, Chereau&#8217;s work is carefully considered, brimming with passion and integrity and though FTHOTD didn&#8217;t originate at the Met, it apparently is a milestone in the company&#8217;s history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Dahling</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106342</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Dahling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106342</guid>
		<description>I assume that last sentence is supposed to be ironic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that last sentence is supposed to be ironic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Often admonished</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2009/11/18/lock-up-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-106340</link>
		<dc:creator>Often admonished</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=10060#comment-106340</guid>
		<description>Under Volpe&#039;s administration the Met ran a clever rep system which made it one of the most efficient garages for good individual performances ever. 

House of the Dead is essentially a stagione system import. In order to achieve that ensemble quality on a consistent basis, Gelb will need to look at whole scale restructuring. The discomfort to his audience will be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Volpe&#8217;s administration the Met ran a clever rep system which made it one of the most efficient garages for good individual performances ever. </p>
<p>House of the Dead is essentially a stagione system import. In order to achieve that ensemble quality on a consistent basis, Gelb will need to look at whole scale restructuring. The discomfort to his audience will be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 764/793 objects using apc

Served from: parterre.com @ 2012-05-27 04:45:12 -->
