Headshot of La Cieca

Cher Public

  • brooklynpunk: " it does not follow that as many people will embrace opera”...
  • MontyNostry: Presumably JDD was singing that aria, so some of the standin...
  • quoth the maven: Entirely unfair. The union agreed to the contract; the cast,...
  • The Wistful Pelleastrian: That Grammy crowd gave a standing ovation to an opera ari...
  • marshiemarkII: Bravo tenorino!!!!! much as I thoroughly enjoyed the other o...
  • iltenoredigrazia: Thank you, thank you (bow down to the floor, hands to my che...
  • Betsy_Ann_Bobolink: Is it all right to say "John Huston," "Angelica Huston," or ...
  • kashania: Extravaganza is the word, all right. What fun! Congratulatio...
  • brooklynpunk: thanks, S-conductor!..... a much more "up-beat" rig...
  • whatever: mille grazie, IL3!

blog advertising is good for you

A Tale of Two Guelfis

… and, by the way, an interesting contrast between a “great” conductor of today and a routinier from four decades ago.

Carlo Guelfi (with Gatti) 2009

Giangiacomo Guelfi (with Rescigno) 1969

47 comments

  • squirrel says:

    Yes, I would say!

  • rommie says:

    well my bad then.

    i guess i wont be working at the met anytime soon. HA

  • rommie says:

    but seriously…

    what will happen to La Boheme at the Met? the Met Futures site has nothing on a new production.

  • squirrel says:

    it’s going to be there for another 15 years, and then it’s going to be redone by Otto Schenk.

  • CruzSF says:

    Rommie & squirrel, you guys kill me! (I mean that nicely.) It’s almost like being there while you have the dialogue. Thanks to both of you for your reports.

  • matto per la lirica says:

    What is he difference between an opera house and an insane asylum?

    In the asylum the director is sane…..

  • qualorribilepeccato says:

    #6, I think that the first marschallin was margarete siems, a zerbinetta etc. If strauss wanted a heavier voice, he had plenty of dramatics to choose from.

  • Byrnham Woode says:

    The Met BOHEME dates from 1982 and is far from being the company’s oldest production.

    The would be the Zeffirelli (!) FALSTAFF, which dates from 1964 in the old house. It was recently refurbished.

    The third production seen at Lincoln Center was used just last season; LA GIOCONDA. Though the costumes were redone in the 1970s or 80s because of a warehouse fire.

    DER ROSENKAVALIER dates from 1968, also rebuilt, and is arguably a more succesful production than the BOHEME.

    Gelb is right: nothing should last forever. But there is no set-rule about when something is to be replaced. There are too many factors involved, including occasion, singers, designer, director, etc.

    Bayreuth retained the original production of PARSIFAL for 50 years! And Wieland Wagner’s famous 1951 staging lasted til 1973, 7 years after he had died. Wisely, even these “hallowed” productions were eventually replaced.

  • Graciella Scusi says:

    @37 qualorribilepeccato : “I think the first marschallin was margarete siems, a zerbinetta, etc….”

    And it’s at that “etc.” where the confusion may start; she was also the first Chrysothemis, and sang Aida, Sieglinde, and Isolde as well as coloratura roles.

  • Will says:

    Right, Graciella–they had TECHNIQUES then! Lili Lehmann sang high coloratura parts, Norma, Isolde and the Ring. Lillian Nordica was a Queen of the Night and an Isolde and the soprano in the MET’s first Verdi Requiem. Several others had that dazzling ability to run the gamut of fachs. Part of that, I suspect, was that the massive, relatively inflexible dramatic soprano voice (the Nilsson/Varnay type) didn’t exist then and wasn’t expected. People know how to listen then and wanted good singing, not brute volume.

    As to the oldest productions in the MET’s current stock, I would propose Adriana Lecouvreur. It was tarted up, as the Victorians would say, quite a bit last season, but the core remains from its January 1, 1963 premiere, 46-1/2 years ago.

    In his sneering, dismissive review of the opera itself, Irving Kolodin opined the money spent on the orchestral parts to be a complete waste as surely very few MET musicians would ever play the vapid, superficial music again. Wrong! Does anyone want to predict with certainty that we won’t ever see this production again?