<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: four weedings and a funeral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/</link>
	<description>where opera is king and you, the readers, are queens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:57:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>the flamingo opera commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-15/#comment-38425</link>
		<dc:creator>the flamingo opera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-38425</guid>
		<description>Finally, its announced : the ghosts of versaille, Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk, Die Frau Ohne Shatten and Benvenuto Cellini.
But three operas will be added : Elektra, La Traviata and Ariadne auf Naxos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, its announced : the ghosts of versaille, Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk, Die Frau Ohne Shatten and Benvenuto Cellini.<br />
But three operas will be added : Elektra, La Traviata and Ariadne auf Naxos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>whatever commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-15/#comment-35302</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35302</guid>
		<description>i would agree that, in general, an organization of the met&#039;s sophistication should be pretty buttoned-down about sales projections ... but in an environment where the stock market spasms in 900 point daily swings, who knows what to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would agree that, in general, an organization of the met&#8217;s sophistication should be pretty buttoned-down about sales projections &#8230; but in an environment where the stock market spasms in 900 point daily swings, who knows what to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>mrmyster commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-15/#comment-35301</link>
		<dc:creator>mrmyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35301</guid>
		<description>#139 - not so sure, Mme Cieca about projecting ticket sales. Of subscriptions already ordered and paid, yes. But that&#039;s a minor % of box office, I expect. Does it not depend where the economy goes? THAT is truly unknowable; right now it&#039;s pretty scary.The Dow Jones looks like it is having a bad case of of the willies -- up and down like Bill Clinton&#039;s dick!  It&#039;s a bad symptom and bodes ill for the Met - Remember in 1929 - 33 or so, it took the depression economy a few years, two or three, to take hold; Krugman says today we are already in &quot;depression economy.&quot; Elective opera tickets would be the first to go. Think what it costs a  NYC couple with kids to go to the opera: Seats for the show, $500; dinner first (Grand Tier), $200/$300; baby sitter, $100; taxis and tips, $50. Maybe drinks at an intermission or two, or a bottle of Veuve Cliquot at your Grand Tier Restr. table -- up to $125.  Tot that up - could very easily reach to $800 or $1000. 
   There are cheaper ways to the opera, as we know, but one of the best is to NOT go, and listen on your Sirius radio. Bottom line: Versailles is probably only the first to be cut. Highly likely, more to come. Not a good time for the opera profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#139 &#8211; not so sure, Mme Cieca about projecting ticket sales. Of subscriptions already ordered and paid, yes. But that&#8217;s a minor % of box office, I expect. Does it not depend where the economy goes? THAT is truly unknowable; right now it&#8217;s pretty scary.The Dow Jones looks like it is having a bad case of of the willies &#8212; up and down like Bill Clinton&#8217;s dick!  It&#8217;s a bad symptom and bodes ill for the Met &#8211; Remember in 1929 &#8211; 33 or so, it took the depression economy a few years, two or three, to take hold; Krugman says today we are already in &#8220;depression economy.&#8221; Elective opera tickets would be the first to go. Think what it costs a  NYC couple with kids to go to the opera: Seats for the show, $500; dinner first (Grand Tier), $200/$300; baby sitter, $100; taxis and tips, $50. Maybe drinks at an intermission or two, or a bottle of Veuve Cliquot at your Grand Tier Restr. table &#8212; up to $125.  Tot that up &#8211; could very easily reach to $800 or $1000.<br />
   There are cheaper ways to the opera, as we know, but one of the best is to NOT go, and listen on your Sirius radio. Bottom line: Versailles is probably only the first to be cut. Highly likely, more to come. Not a good time for the opera profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Indiana Loiterer III commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35300</link>
		<dc:creator>Indiana Loiterer III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35300</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lulu&lt;/i&gt; is also less expensive to put on than some other operas; while the orchestra is triple wind and the cast fairly big, there is no chorus, and the production is relatively inexpensive (no special effects).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lulu</i> is also less expensive to put on than some other operas; while the orchestra is triple wind and the cast fairly big, there is no chorus, and the production is relatively inexpensive (no special effects).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>La Cieca commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35299</link>
		<dc:creator>La Cieca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35299</guid>
		<description>whatever: It seems to me that by now the Met should be able to make pretty accurate projections of ticket sales for next season, at least comparing production to production.  I know that the audiences for &lt;I&gt;Lulu&lt;/i&gt; were pretty skimpy last time around but maybe tastes have changed some in the past decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatever: It seems to me that by now the Met should be able to make pretty accurate projections of ticket sales for next season, at least comparing production to production.  I know that the audiences for <i>Lulu</i> were pretty skimpy last time around but maybe tastes have changed some in the past decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>whatever commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35298</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35298</guid>
		<description>la cieca, that raises an interesting point -- at this point, which takes higher priority: trimming production cost, or minimizing box office risk? in the profit sector, one usually would look to the bottom line to see the net impact of a proposed change on an existing P&amp;L. but it is always easier accuarately to project cost savings than revenues.

i dunno ... probably three lulus would sell. but as you suggest there are two moving parts here: revenues and costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>la cieca, that raises an interesting point &#8212; at this point, which takes higher priority: trimming production cost, or minimizing box office risk? in the profit sector, one usually would look to the bottom line to see the net impact of a proposed change on an existing P&amp;L. but it is always easier accuarately to project cost savings than revenues.</p>
<p>i dunno &#8230; probably three lulus would sell. but as you suggest there are two moving parts here: revenues and costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>La Cieca commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35295</link>
		<dc:creator>La Cieca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35295</guid>
		<description>whatever: Well, the Lulu is scheduled for only 3 performances but surely would require quite a bit of rehearsal after being out of the rep for 8 years. But on the other hand the opera is one of Levine&#039;s favorites and this may be his last chance at conducting it. My intuition is that Gelb would pitch it to Levine that he could lose the Lulu but take over the Elektra which is more or less the same time. Hard to say which is tougher on the box office, 3 Lulus or 5 Cellinis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatever: Well, the Lulu is scheduled for only 3 performances but surely would require quite a bit of rehearsal after being out of the rep for 8 years. But on the other hand the opera is one of Levine&#8217;s favorites and this may be his last chance at conducting it. My intuition is that Gelb would pitch it to Levine that he could lose the Lulu but take over the Elektra which is more or less the same time. Hard to say which is tougher on the box office, 3 Lulus or 5 Cellinis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>whatever commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35293</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35293</guid>
		<description>at the risk of being lambasted for a possibly naive observation (especially after totally stuffing up the cheno/ghost&#039;s predcition yesterday): wouldn&#039;t having AP attribution that the 8 new productions are safe make it more problematic for gelb to step back from that, er, commitment?

if the other three are coming out of rep, it&#039;s lulu amd mtensk fershur, and then either frau or cellini.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at the risk of being lambasted for a possibly naive observation (especially after totally stuffing up the cheno/ghost&#8217;s predcition yesterday): wouldn&#8217;t having AP attribution that the 8 new productions are safe make it more problematic for gelb to step back from that, er, commitment?</p>
<p>if the other three are coming out of rep, it&#8217;s lulu amd mtensk fershur, and then either frau or cellini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>La Cieca commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35277</link>
		<dc:creator>La Cieca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35277</guid>
		<description>Hans: Gelb&#039;s first statement to the NYT stressed that the new productions would go on as scheduled and that the cutbacks would be from within the revivals. Of course, that&#039;s the decision for now and obviously a lot of things can happen between now and 2010.

There&#039;s some talk already of &lt;I&gt;Elektra&lt;/i&gt; replacing &lt;I&gt;Frau&lt;/I&gt; which presumably leaves two to be bumped from the following list:

Le nozze di Figaro, Die ZauberflÃ¶te, Aida, Il barbiere di Siviglia, Der Rosenkavalier, Turandot, La Damnation de Faust, Il trittico, Die Frau ohne Schatten, Hansel and Gretel, Stiffelio, Simon Boccanegra, &lt;u&gt;Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk&lt;/u&gt;, La Fille du Regiment, La boheme, Der Fliegende Hollander, &lt;u&gt;Benvenuto Cellini&lt;/u&gt;, Lulu.

I&#039;m going to go with the two titles I underlined, with Celllini maybe rolling over into Carmen and the Lady M... well, who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans: Gelb&#8217;s first statement to the NYT stressed that the new productions would go on as scheduled and that the cutbacks would be from within the revivals. Of course, that&#8217;s the decision for now and obviously a lot of things can happen between now and 2010.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some talk already of <i>Elektra</i> replacing <i>Frau</i> which presumably leaves two to be bumped from the following list:</p>
<p>Le nozze di Figaro, Die ZauberflÃ¶te, Aida, Il barbiere di Siviglia, Der Rosenkavalier, Turandot, La Damnation de Faust, Il trittico, Die Frau ohne Schatten, Hansel and Gretel, Stiffelio, Simon Boccanegra, <u>Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk</u>, La Fille du Regiment, La boheme, Der Fliegende Hollander, <u>Benvenuto Cellini</u>, Lulu.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go with the two titles I underlined, with Celllini maybe rolling over into Carmen and the Lady M&#8230; well, who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hans Lick commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35276</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Lick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35276</guid>
		<description>The new productions I &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; to see are Armida, The Nose, Attila, House of the Dead, and Hamlet, so I presume the four deep-sixed will all be chosen from this group. Whichever ones already exist, in the reps of other houses co-producing, are the likeliest ones to show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new productions I <i>want</i> to see are Armida, The Nose, Attila, House of the Dead, and Hamlet, so I presume the four deep-sixed will all be chosen from this group. Whichever ones already exist, in the reps of other houses co-producing, are the likeliest ones to show up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>whatever commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35271</link>
		<dc:creator>whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35271</guid>
		<description>now that (some) word is out wrt programming changes at the met next season, what of opera chic&#039;s scoop on our friends down in the charm city?

i&#039;ve seen some lovely little productions -- including a riveting lady mtsensk a few years back --at the lyric opera house (just a few minutes&#039; walk from penn station baltimore, making day trips a breeze).

it would be ashame to see them go under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now that (some) word is out wrt programming changes at the met next season, what of opera chic&#8217;s scoop on our friends down in the charm city?</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve seen some lovely little productions &#8212; including a riveting lady mtsensk a few years back &#8211;at the lyric opera house (just a few minutes&#8217; walk from penn station baltimore, making day trips a breeze).</p>
<p>it would be ashame to see them go under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DirkVA commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35186</link>
		<dc:creator>DirkVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35186</guid>
		<description>&quot;But her money is already paid, right? Good! Take the money and run!&quot;

I devoutly pray, for the future of opera, that no company makes you Development Director.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But her money is already paid, right? Good! Take the money and run!&#8221;</p>
<p>I devoutly pray, for the future of opera, that no company makes you Development Director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Doris Godunov commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-14/#comment-35185</link>
		<dc:creator>Doris Godunov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35185</guid>
		<description>re 118 - I think most people agree that the music of &#039;Cellini&#039; is not the problem - I personally think it&#039;s rather fabulous, but as an opera experience it is hugely problematic. There&#039;s almost too much in it - there&#039;s something exhausting and hyper about it. Colin Davis loves the piece and has done it several times in concert, and there&#039;s a good recording on the LSO&#039;s own label. I enjoyed it so much more in concert (where I&#039;ve heard it twice - so something impelled me to go back) - onstage at the Met it was a drag - the director obviously didn&#039;t trust the piece, hence all the distractions, but I&#039;m not sure it would work in a more sympathetically attuned production.

And don&#039;t give it a bloody Nose - it&#039;s no masterpiece but it can be fun. Just not in a huge house - it&#039;s one of those events that should be like Hellzapoppin, cast invading the audience and all that....

Never liked Ghosts of Versailles personally - a big cop out, idioms in search of an author, pastiches of Mozart and bad Rossini most of it written in acceptable musical styles so as not to frighten the horses, or  middle-of-the-road audiences. Bourgeois crapola. Good riddance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re 118 &#8211; I think most people agree that the music of &#8216;Cellini&#8217; is not the problem &#8211; I personally think it&#8217;s rather fabulous, but as an opera experience it is hugely problematic. There&#8217;s almost too much in it &#8211; there&#8217;s something exhausting and hyper about it. Colin Davis loves the piece and has done it several times in concert, and there&#8217;s a good recording on the LSO&#8217;s own label. I enjoyed it so much more in concert (where I&#8217;ve heard it twice &#8211; so something impelled me to go back) &#8211; onstage at the Met it was a drag &#8211; the director obviously didn&#8217;t trust the piece, hence all the distractions, but I&#8217;m not sure it would work in a more sympathetically attuned production.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t give it a bloody Nose &#8211; it&#8217;s no masterpiece but it can be fun. Just not in a huge house &#8211; it&#8217;s one of those events that should be like Hellzapoppin, cast invading the audience and all that&#8230;.</p>
<p>Never liked Ghosts of Versailles personally &#8211; a big cop out, idioms in search of an author, pastiches of Mozart and bad Rossini most of it written in acceptable musical styles so as not to frighten the horses, or  middle-of-the-road audiences. Bourgeois crapola. Good riddance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Vanderdecken commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-13/#comment-35173</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanderdecken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35173</guid>
		<description>Just a wild guess: when Gheorghiu sings Carmen, she&#039;ll probably perform the original version of the Habanera, which she also did on her recording, and then give her adoring public the more famous second one as an encore immediately after that.
Less likely, but it could happen: a production of Armida in which the lead character is green and then Chenoweth comes on as an extra character and interpolates &#039;Popular&#039;, right after Fleming has sung D&#039;amore al dolce impero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a wild guess: when Gheorghiu sings Carmen, she&#8217;ll probably perform the original version of the Habanera, which she also did on her recording, and then give her adoring public the more famous second one as an encore immediately after that.<br />
Less likely, but it could happen: a production of Armida in which the lead character is green and then Chenoweth comes on as an extra character and interpolates &#8216;Popular&#8217;, right after Fleming has sung D&#8217;amore al dolce impero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DirkVA commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-13/#comment-35150</link>
		<dc:creator>DirkVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35150</guid>
		<description>&quot;... the HD broadcast and DVD sales that have done so much to bring in new audiences and reinvigorate â€œoldâ€ ones has created a situation in which stars only want to do new productions, as those are the ones most likely to be broadcast and/or sold to distributors.&quot;

That point would be far more plausible if Maria Callas had not been just as insistent on new productions long before the motives you mention were ever thought of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; the HD broadcast and DVD sales that have done so much to bring in new audiences and reinvigorate â€œoldâ€ ones has created a situation in which stars only want to do new productions, as those are the ones most likely to be broadcast and/or sold to distributors.&#8221;</p>
<p>That point would be far more plausible if Maria Callas had not been just as insistent on new productions long before the motives you mention were ever thought of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Caliber's Ex commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-13/#comment-35149</link>
		<dc:creator>Caliber's Ex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35149</guid>
		<description>netrebko owns short skirted modern porn version of Traviata
so far vocally, she does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>netrebko owns short skirted modern porn version of Traviata<br />
so far vocally, she does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Constantine A. Papas commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-13/#comment-35148</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine A. Papas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35148</guid>
		<description>Dear La Cieca,

My comment pertained only to Willy Decker&#039;s La Traviata. In recent Met productions other sopranos exhibited dramatic singing and acting of notice. For the Salzubrg production, Netrebko owns Violetta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear La Cieca,</p>
<p>My comment pertained only to Willy Decker&#8217;s La Traviata. In recent Met productions other sopranos exhibited dramatic singing and acting of notice. For the Salzubrg production, Netrebko owns Violetta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Feldmarschallin commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-13/#comment-35141</link>
		<dc:creator>Feldmarschallin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35141</guid>
		<description>here is the Petersen website:
http://www.marlis-petersen.de/pages/startseite/startseite.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is the Petersen website:<br />
<a href="http://www.marlis-petersen.de/pages/startseite/startseite.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.marlis-petersen.de/pages/startseite/startseite.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Mere Lichter commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-13/#comment-35134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mere Lichter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35134</guid>
		<description>I could see Szot as the Barbiere Figaro. It would be a good fit for an opera neophyte audience he may draw, as well. But whatever he&#039;s in, I hope its an HD transmission!

I am very excited about a possible Elektra. It&#039;s been too long.

Canning Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk will upset me. It&#039;s been too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see Szot as the Barbiere Figaro. It would be a good fit for an opera neophyte audience he may draw, as well. But whatever he&#8217;s in, I hope its an HD transmission!</p>
<p>I am very excited about a possible Elektra. It&#8217;s been too long.</p>
<p>Canning Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk will upset me. It&#8217;s been too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>mrmyster commented</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/11/12/the-sign-of-four/comment-page-13/#comment-35132</link>
		<dc:creator>mrmyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1744#comment-35132</guid>
		<description>#83 - Diva. Sorry this is &#039;late&#039; - my attention has been elsewhere.  Of course keep Susan Baker&#039;s money (was it all that much? $5-mil?), but I think she&#039;s now shown her incompetence -- and her board seems surprisingly quiet about it all.
I much want NYCO to reorganize and get back on track, and Mortier&#039;s flip is really no surprise. Kaiser as advisor is fine. But it is time for a new leader at NYCO who has more public faith than Mrs B.
But her money is already paid, right? Good! Take the money and run!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#83 &#8211; Diva. Sorry this is &#8216;late&#8217; &#8211; my attention has been elsewhere.  Of course keep Susan Baker&#8217;s money (was it all that much? $5-mil?), but I think she&#8217;s now shown her incompetence &#8212; and her board seems surprisingly quiet about it all.<br />
I much want NYCO to reorganize and get back on track, and Mortier&#8217;s flip is really no surprise. Kaiser as advisor is fine. But it is time for a new leader at NYCO who has more public faith than Mrs B.<br />
But her money is already paid, right? Good! Take the money and run!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
