<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: requiem and rehearsal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/</link>
	<description>where opera is king and you, the readers, are queens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:25:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OperaGhost</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29459</link>
		<dc:creator>OperaGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29459</guid>
		<description>The orchestra is exhausted at the moment.  The preseason rehearsal schedule has been insane and they are working around the clock.  Adding the Requiem to the already-full schedule has pushed them over the top.  You wouldn&#039;t believe how much they are working right now.  Cut them some slack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The orchestra is exhausted at the moment.  The preseason rehearsal schedule has been insane and they are working around the clock.  Adding the Requiem to the already-full schedule has pushed them over the top.  You wouldn&#8217;t believe how much they are working right now.  Cut them some slack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gianni</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29252</link>
		<dc:creator>Gianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29252</guid>
		<description>The Orchestra was atrocious last evening.  That is saying quite a bit as I LOVE the MET Orchestra.  An Orchestra that can make Wozzeck sound simple is a great Orchestra when handled by a capable conductor, it really is one of the great orchestras as I heard, albeit on Sirius, at the Verdi Requiem.  There were shadings, phrasings,  and small details I had never really noticed before.  Perhaps it was Levine&#039;s working on the internal lines more than others, I dont know but I was very touched by that presentation in particular. As for my last quip at Gualtier Malde, I apologize,  think you need to keep very high standards in this day and age  and this is not a Metropoliatn Opera Standard.  And I am sorry all the notes being in place is not good enough for the MET and all the high notes were NOT there there was one note that sho obviously substitututed a G# instead of a B because she was completely shot.  Seemless legato try NO LEGATO.  Jochanahaan was inaudible and I was on the Grand Tier. Kaiser is acceptable perhaps to Don Basilio but nothing else.  The MET cannot continue in this artistic voice or else there will be no standards whatsoever.  Gelb needs to stop involving himself in the artistic end of things and stick to PR in which he is excellent. They need a new set of ears that actually has standards and is willing to say this doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Orchestra was atrocious last evening.  That is saying quite a bit as I LOVE the MET Orchestra.  An Orchestra that can make Wozzeck sound simple is a great Orchestra when handled by a capable conductor, it really is one of the great orchestras as I heard, albeit on Sirius, at the Verdi Requiem.  There were shadings, phrasings,  and small details I had never really noticed before.  Perhaps it was Levine&#8217;s working on the internal lines more than others, I dont know but I was very touched by that presentation in particular. As for my last quip at Gualtier Malde, I apologize,  think you need to keep very high standards in this day and age  and this is not a Metropoliatn Opera Standard.  And I am sorry all the notes being in place is not good enough for the MET and all the high notes were NOT there there was one note that sho obviously substitututed a G# instead of a B because she was completely shot.  Seemless legato try NO LEGATO.  Jochanahaan was inaudible and I was on the Grand Tier. Kaiser is acceptable perhaps to Don Basilio but nothing else.  The MET cannot continue in this artistic voice or else there will be no standards whatsoever.  Gelb needs to stop involving himself in the artistic end of things and stick to PR in which he is excellent. They need a new set of ears that actually has standards and is willing to say this doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Princess Eudoxie</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29248</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Eudoxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29248</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be quite so quick to dismiss the comments from people at the rehearsals. I think Mattila&#039;s vocal shape is quite fragile at this point, as evidenced by other recent productions. That she pulled it out at the performance doesn&#039;t surprise me, she is a pro. But I would bet we&#039;ll see cancellations, and I&#039;d be surprised if the Met gets a broadcast/dvd worthy performance out of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be quite so quick to dismiss the comments from people at the rehearsals. I think Mattila&#8217;s vocal shape is quite fragile at this point, as evidenced by other recent productions. That she pulled it out at the performance doesn&#8217;t surprise me, she is a pro. But I would bet we&#8217;ll see cancellations, and I&#8217;d be surprised if the Met gets a broadcast/dvd worthy performance out of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmm...</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29233</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmm...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29233</guid>
		<description>I gotta agree with Gianni- I was there last night as well, and found it to be very harsh. There was beauty in the 04 performances, and that seemed to be lacking last evening. Also, the orchestra sounded like a band...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree with Gianni- I was there last night as well, and found it to be very harsh. There was beauty in the 04 performances, and that seemed to be lacking last evening. Also, the orchestra sounded like a band&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josephine</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29202</link>
		<dc:creator>Josephine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29202</guid>
		<description>Gianni

I can understand why you would take issue with Gualtier&#039;s ears in the light of your disgraceful experience at the Met, even though he is hardly responsible for that.  But why does he need a new set of balls? 

Your name, Gianni, is actually far more suitable to one of my favorite Christmas carols than Gualtier&#039;s:

Deck the halls with balls of Gianni
Fa la la la la la la la la</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gianni</p>
<p>I can understand why you would take issue with Gualtier&#8217;s ears in the light of your disgraceful experience at the Met, even though he is hardly responsible for that.  But why does he need a new set of balls? </p>
<p>Your name, Gianni, is actually far more suitable to one of my favorite Christmas carols than Gualtier&#8217;s:</p>
<p>Deck the halls with balls of Gianni<br />
Fa la la la la la la la la</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gianni</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29200</link>
		<dc:creator>Gianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29200</guid>
		<description>Just back from the MET Salome and I will say that this was dreadful simply dreadful. Gualtier you need a new set of ears or balls.  Horrible performance.... What a disgrace..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just back from the MET Salome and I will say that this was dreadful simply dreadful. Gualtier you need a new set of ears or balls.  Horrible performance&#8230;. What a disgrace..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrmyster</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29194</link>
		<dc:creator>mrmyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29194</guid>
		<description>Malde&#039;s description is what I heard on Sirius - Mattila is gettng older, she is still a game artist. Last year as the Puccini Manon she just did a lot of screaming above the staff - seemed to have an all-purpose high note of very vague pitch. I did hear some of that tonight in the final twenty minutes. As for the comment that Salome is all &quot;effect music,&quot; well yes!
Sure in hell is -- very Oscar Wilde, eh wot? Of course it is not profound, has no &quot;humanity&quot; -- it&#039;s not in the story. Salome is the true &#039;shabby little shocker&#039; -- we&#039;ve heard it about ten zillion times here in Santa Fe -- it was Crosby&#039;s bread-and-butter, and I am sick of the damn thing. It can work on two counts - if and when the orchestra is fine and if it is well conducted -- such can be very exciting; and when you have an early Welitsch or a prime Nilsson in the role, the vocalization of the final scene can also be very thrilling and effective. But for pete&#039;s sake don&#039;t expect emotional resolution or high humanity - it&#039;s guignol! 
mrmyster
santa fe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malde&#8217;s description is what I heard on Sirius &#8211; Mattila is gettng older, she is still a game artist. Last year as the Puccini Manon she just did a lot of screaming above the staff &#8211; seemed to have an all-purpose high note of very vague pitch. I did hear some of that tonight in the final twenty minutes. As for the comment that Salome is all &#8220;effect music,&#8221; well yes!<br />
Sure in hell is &#8212; very Oscar Wilde, eh wot? Of course it is not profound, has no &#8220;humanity&#8221; &#8212; it&#8217;s not in the story. Salome is the true &#8216;shabby little shocker&#8217; &#8212; we&#8217;ve heard it about ten zillion times here in Santa Fe &#8212; it was Crosby&#8217;s bread-and-butter, and I am sick of the damn thing. It can work on two counts &#8211; if and when the orchestra is fine and if it is well conducted &#8212; such can be very exciting; and when you have an early Welitsch or a prime Nilsson in the role, the vocalization of the final scene can also be very thrilling and effective. But for pete&#8217;s sake don&#8217;t expect emotional resolution or high humanity &#8211; it&#8217;s guignol!<br />
mrmyster<br />
santa fe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29190</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29190</guid>
		<description>At the Salome tonight, Mattila had all the notes in place, no problem with the high notes at all.
She does not possess a very seamless or caressing legato - amd legato is required in certain stretches of the role - She received a nice ovation at the end but then do not most Salomes ?  Others however have sung with more vocal nuance.    
Kim Begley may have been the best of the entire cast with precise diction and attractive tone as Herod.  Ildiko Komlosi is a bit blowsy as Herodias but her top notes are brilliant - unusual for Herodias as many of those singing the role are a bit over the hill vocally.  Uusitalo as Jochanaan improved as the evening went along - the voice is strong but not as sonorous aa a Hotter or Schoeffler nor as beautiful as a Waechter or Weikl.  Uusitalo is probably better as Wotan.  Kaiser was acceptable.   I thought the conducting to be mediocre or maybe the orchestra just did not play with the delicacy required in the lyrical passages or with the warmth of tone which other conductors such as Boehm could elicit.  I disliked the production last time round and it hardly improves on second viewing. The house was quite full.  Not a scintillating or electrifying Salome but a serviceable performance despite a rather hideous set.  Mattila still maintains a very flexible body though I wished at times she would have concentrated more on producing a more even vocal line and a bit less on the physical gymnastics the production seems to require.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Salome tonight, Mattila had all the notes in place, no problem with the high notes at all.<br />
She does not possess a very seamless or caressing legato &#8211; amd legato is required in certain stretches of the role &#8211; She received a nice ovation at the end but then do not most Salomes ?  Others however have sung with more vocal nuance.<br />
Kim Begley may have been the best of the entire cast with precise diction and attractive tone as Herod.  Ildiko Komlosi is a bit blowsy as Herodias but her top notes are brilliant &#8211; unusual for Herodias as many of those singing the role are a bit over the hill vocally.  Uusitalo as Jochanaan improved as the evening went along &#8211; the voice is strong but not as sonorous aa a Hotter or Schoeffler nor as beautiful as a Waechter or Weikl.  Uusitalo is probably better as Wotan.  Kaiser was acceptable.   I thought the conducting to be mediocre or maybe the orchestra just did not play with the delicacy required in the lyrical passages or with the warmth of tone which other conductors such as Boehm could elicit.  I disliked the production last time round and it hardly improves on second viewing. The house was quite full.  Not a scintillating or electrifying Salome but a serviceable performance despite a rather hideous set.  Mattila still maintains a very flexible body though I wished at times she would have concentrated more on producing a more even vocal line and a bit less on the physical gymnastics the production seems to require.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josephine</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-14/#comment-29186</link>
		<dc:creator>Josephine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29186</guid>
		<description>Several of my friends were also in the house tonight and raved about Mattila which brings up the question about Cassholeandra who in the guise of in the &quot;business&quot; and present at the rehearsals lied lied lied.  Why did she do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several of my friends were also in the house tonight and raved about Mattila which brings up the question about Cassholeandra who in the guise of in the &#8220;business&#8221; and present at the rehearsals lied lied lied.  Why did she do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kashania</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29185</link>
		<dc:creator>kashania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29185</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m so glad to hear that. Mattila&#039;s Salome was one of the greatest things I&#039;ve ever experienced. I was hoping she&#039;d knock &#039;em dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m so glad to hear that. Mattila&#8217;s Salome was one of the greatest things I&#8217;ve ever experienced. I was hoping she&#8217;d knock &#8216;em dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gualtier MaldÃ¨</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29184</link>
		<dc:creator>Gualtier MaldÃ¨</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29184</guid>
		<description>[La Cieca has &quot;promoted&quot; this comment to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://parterre.com/?p=1406&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;posting of its own&lt;/a&gt;.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[La Cieca has "promoted" this comment to a <a href="http://parterre.com/?p=1406" rel="nofollow">posting of its own</a>.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Cieca</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29180</link>
		<dc:creator>La Cieca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29180</guid>
		<description>brooklynpunk: your take from the radio is similar to that of La Cieca&#039;s spy in the house tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brooklynpunk: your take from the radio is similar to that of La Cieca&#8217;s spy in the house tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooklynpunk</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29179</link>
		<dc:creator>brooklynpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29179</guid>
		<description>Well...

At least over Sirius cyber-space, tonight&#039;s SALOME, at the MET sounded like a dramatic tour-de-force..no prophesised melt-downs--at least no unintentional ones--to these ears.

I was very less than wild(e)about the last outing  of this production, in 2004..in fact , I thought it stunk to high heaven.  Tonight, however, I was very hooked in to Matilla&#039;s deranged Princess of Judea.  she actually started out in an almost Mozart-ean sound, until she got crazier and crazier.

While I know what we hear over the air isn&#039;t the same as what  is heard in the House, I thought Kaiser sounded quite fine---no trouble hearing him---or liking what I heard.

Summers&#039;s reading was much more lyrical than many other conductors might chose...but very beautiful, and very dramatic nonetheless...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;</p>
<p>At least over Sirius cyber-space, tonight&#8217;s SALOME, at the MET sounded like a dramatic tour-de-force..no prophesised melt-downs&#8211;at least no unintentional ones&#8211;to these ears.</p>
<p>I was very less than wild(e)about the last outing  of this production, in 2004..in fact , I thought it stunk to high heaven.  Tonight, however, I was very hooked in to Matilla&#8217;s deranged Princess of Judea.  she actually started out in an almost Mozart-ean sound, until she got crazier and crazier.</p>
<p>While I know what we hear over the air isn&#8217;t the same as what  is heard in the House, I thought Kaiser sounded quite fine&#8212;no trouble hearing him&#8212;or liking what I heard.</p>
<p>Summers&#8217;s reading was much more lyrical than many other conductors might chose&#8230;but very beautiful, and very dramatic nonetheless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gianni</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29093</link>
		<dc:creator>Gianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29093</guid>
		<description>Cocky

Thinking about it, I think you are right.  In the sound she has the framework for a very large voice but without a core to it we will never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cocky</p>
<p>Thinking about it, I think you are right.  In the sound she has the framework for a very large voice but without a core to it we will never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cocky Kurwenal</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29051</link>
		<dc:creator>Cocky Kurwenal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29051</guid>
		<description>I feel as if I understand it, Scara, but slightly despair of being able to get it across... voices work to their best advantage, as everybody knows, when the singer simply breathes well and lets it out.  Assuming a body is perfectly relaxed to start with, the in breath will be deep without the singer &#039;trying&#039; to take a deep breath, the support muslces will engage automatically (they will not be engaged by conscious will) and the singer will sing.  The voice will naturally make use of whatever resonating chambers exist in the body and the result will be a sound that is properly rich and complex.  

The slightest little manifestations of physical tension in the body will have an impact, and will detract from the sound.  For instance, applying a bit too much pressure to chest muslces will kill a bit of resonance from the chest cavity, as will tense shoulders.  If the back of the tongue comes up either on the in breath, or during singing, it makes access to the top a shade more difficult.  This will have a knock on effect - the singer might really grip with the stomach muscles, or maybe tense and raise the jaw, just to give 2 possible examples, in order to get those top notes out another way.  These things often result in a faster, narrower vibrato, which I think is absolutely manifest all though Mattila&#039;s recital disc (the one which includes Lisa, Elsa, Amelia Grimaldi etc).

Mattila does have quite a lot of tension around her neck and shoulders, and I think this simply limits the extent to which her voice can resonate in her own body.  This is what I find so frustrating about her - were this not the case, we wouldn&#039;t get the polo mint effect, we would get more volume, far more ease, and she&#039;d have access to a much broader range of repertoire.  

I have no doubt that somebody will now come along and tell me the above is totally inaccurate, or possibly that I know nothing about singing, but whatever.  That is my sense of what is going on with Mattila, a sense I have gained through working to address a lot of my own tension issues with a really marvellous teacher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel as if I understand it, Scara, but slightly despair of being able to get it across&#8230; voices work to their best advantage, as everybody knows, when the singer simply breathes well and lets it out.  Assuming a body is perfectly relaxed to start with, the in breath will be deep without the singer &#8216;trying&#8217; to take a deep breath, the support muslces will engage automatically (they will not be engaged by conscious will) and the singer will sing.  The voice will naturally make use of whatever resonating chambers exist in the body and the result will be a sound that is properly rich and complex.  </p>
<p>The slightest little manifestations of physical tension in the body will have an impact, and will detract from the sound.  For instance, applying a bit too much pressure to chest muslces will kill a bit of resonance from the chest cavity, as will tense shoulders.  If the back of the tongue comes up either on the in breath, or during singing, it makes access to the top a shade more difficult.  This will have a knock on effect &#8211; the singer might really grip with the stomach muscles, or maybe tense and raise the jaw, just to give 2 possible examples, in order to get those top notes out another way.  These things often result in a faster, narrower vibrato, which I think is absolutely manifest all though Mattila&#8217;s recital disc (the one which includes Lisa, Elsa, Amelia Grimaldi etc).</p>
<p>Mattila does have quite a lot of tension around her neck and shoulders, and I think this simply limits the extent to which her voice can resonate in her own body.  This is what I find so frustrating about her &#8211; were this not the case, we wouldn&#8217;t get the polo mint effect, we would get more volume, far more ease, and she&#8217;d have access to a much broader range of repertoire.  </p>
<p>I have no doubt that somebody will now come along and tell me the above is totally inaccurate, or possibly that I know nothing about singing, but whatever.  That is my sense of what is going on with Mattila, a sense I have gained through working to address a lot of my own tension issues with a really marvellous teacher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaramuccio</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29049</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaramuccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29049</guid>
		<description>An interesting take, Cocky; maybe you&#039;re right. It&#039;s a weird paradox that Our Karita has always rather enjoyed throwing herself around on stage (sorry, I did laugh at one of Cassandra&#039;s descriptions, though I laughed even louder at Josephine&#039;s double-riposte) but perhaps the voice has never been trained into the right sort of chuck-around shape? Can any good technician - and a few occasionally drop into this site - explain the polo effect?

Just been watching (&#039;cos I had to) Nadja Michael&#039;s Salome on DVD, and close up the intensity of her performance does carry all the awful tuning and approximate singing. From a distance in the opera house, I winced. I thoroughly recommend the 50-minute &#039;let&#039;s make an opera&#039; documentary that goes with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting take, Cocky; maybe you&#8217;re right. It&#8217;s a weird paradox that Our Karita has always rather enjoyed throwing herself around on stage (sorry, I did laugh at one of Cassandra&#8217;s descriptions, though I laughed even louder at Josephine&#8217;s double-riposte) but perhaps the voice has never been trained into the right sort of chuck-around shape? Can any good technician &#8211; and a few occasionally drop into this site &#8211; explain the polo effect?</p>
<p>Just been watching (&#8216;cos I had to) Nadja Michael&#8217;s Salome on DVD, and close up the intensity of her performance does carry all the awful tuning and approximate singing. From a distance in the opera house, I winced. I thoroughly recommend the 50-minute &#8216;let&#8217;s make an opera&#8217; documentary that goes with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cocky Kurwenal</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29042</link>
		<dc:creator>Cocky Kurwenal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29042</guid>
		<description>To take up another of Cassandra&#039;s points, isn&#039;t the reason that Zajick doesn&#039;t sing Wagner mostly because she seems not to want to, rather than anything else?  She&#039;s always had a tiny repertoire which she is only prepared to sing in a tiny number of houses and an even tinier number of recording studios.  She is in posession of a high quality voice of a very rare type - the bona fide dramatic mezzo - which means she will always be in demand, and so she works that to her advantage which means she nearly always seems to get to stay at home, and rarely has to learn any new music.  Nice work if you can get it, although not the most exciting career ever (although this dullness is pretty consistent with how she comes across on stage to me).  

She would be more than capable of Fricka, or whatshername in Gotterdammerung - do I mean Waltraute? - or Brangane or Ortrud or Kundry or possibly even Sieglinde.  If she expressed the vaguest desire to sing any of them she&#039;d be booked up like a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To take up another of Cassandra&#8217;s points, isn&#8217;t the reason that Zajick doesn&#8217;t sing Wagner mostly because she seems not to want to, rather than anything else?  She&#8217;s always had a tiny repertoire which she is only prepared to sing in a tiny number of houses and an even tinier number of recording studios.  She is in posession of a high quality voice of a very rare type &#8211; the bona fide dramatic mezzo &#8211; which means she will always be in demand, and so she works that to her advantage which means she nearly always seems to get to stay at home, and rarely has to learn any new music.  Nice work if you can get it, although not the most exciting career ever (although this dullness is pretty consistent with how she comes across on stage to me).  </p>
<p>She would be more than capable of Fricka, or whatshername in Gotterdammerung &#8211; do I mean Waltraute? &#8211; or Brangane or Ortrud or Kundry or possibly even Sieglinde.  If she expressed the vaguest desire to sing any of them she&#8217;d be booked up like a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cocky Kurwenal</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29041</link>
		<dc:creator>Cocky Kurwenal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29041</guid>
		<description>Scara, my take on Mattila is that she should have been doing bigger stuff all along, not the opposite.  She&#039;s never let her voice out in a completely uninhibited, healthy way.  If she were to do so, I think people would be gob-smacked.  My desire to hear her as Isolde assumes a healthy starting point, so no, I guess she shouldn&#039;t do it now.  But I don&#039;t think Mattila has EVER sung to her full potential, or ever got her voice properly sorted out.  If she had done so, I do believe Isolde would have been a great role for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scara, my take on Mattila is that she should have been doing bigger stuff all along, not the opposite.  She&#8217;s never let her voice out in a completely uninhibited, healthy way.  If she were to do so, I think people would be gob-smacked.  My desire to hear her as Isolde assumes a healthy starting point, so no, I guess she shouldn&#8217;t do it now.  But I don&#8217;t think Mattila has EVER sung to her full potential, or ever got her voice properly sorted out.  If she had done so, I do believe Isolde would have been a great role for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaramuccio</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-13/#comment-29038</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaramuccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29038</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be surprised by La Mattila&#039;s unravelling, though I&#039;m sorry for it. A friend who risked her Leonora described the often beautiful sound as polo-like (the mint with the hole) - there&#039;s no fibre at the core (to mix metaphors).

So what was great? Her Elsa, her wacky Musetta (what a gal), Elisabetta from the acting point of view and the aria to the Countess, but NOT &#039;Tu che la vanita&#039;. Surely, Cocky, it would be disastrous for her to do Isolde&#039;s curse stuff in Act One? I&#039;m sure the duet would be beautiful, and even the Liebestod, but...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised by La Mattila&#8217;s unravelling, though I&#8217;m sorry for it. A friend who risked her Leonora described the often beautiful sound as polo-like (the mint with the hole) &#8211; there&#8217;s no fibre at the core (to mix metaphors).</p>
<p>So what was great? Her Elsa, her wacky Musetta (what a gal), Elisabetta from the acting point of view and the aria to the Countess, but NOT &#8216;Tu che la vanita&#8217;. Surely, Cocky, it would be disastrous for her to do Isolde&#8217;s curse stuff in Act One? I&#8217;m sure the duet would be beautiful, and even the Liebestod, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cocky Kurwenal</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-29036</link>
		<dc:creator>Cocky Kurwenal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29036</guid>
		<description>Josephine at 117 and 118, that was amongst your best yet.  Yours &amp;c.

CK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josephine at 117 and 118, that was amongst your best yet.  Yours &amp;c.</p>
<p>CK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruxton</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-29009</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29009</guid>
		<description>We always do! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We always do! <img src='http://parterre.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josephine</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-29007</link>
		<dc:creator>Josephine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29007</guid>
		<description>I am sorry everyone, please disregard my last post.  I was at the OTHER Manon rehearsal with Renee and I don&#039;t know who Cassandra is.  Please carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry everyone, please disregard my last post.  I was at the OTHER Manon rehearsal with Renee and I don&#8217;t know who Cassandra is.  Please carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josephine</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-29005</link>
		<dc:creator>Josephine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-29005</guid>
		<description>Cassandra did not just give an opinion.  She is a professional who WAS at that rehearsal and I can vouch for her because I was there too.  In fact Cassandra exercised self-control in telling that sordid story.  I would have gone nuch further.  I would not want to badmouth my colleagues (yes that&#039;s it, my colleagues) but if I were to tell you the truth you would all freeze in horror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cassandra did not just give an opinion.  She is a professional who WAS at that rehearsal and I can vouch for her because I was there too.  In fact Cassandra exercised self-control in telling that sordid story.  I would have gone nuch further.  I would not want to badmouth my colleagues (yes that&#8217;s it, my colleagues) but if I were to tell you the truth you would all freeze in horror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Enigmi</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-28997</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Enigmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-28997</guid>
		<description>Regardless of whether I misunderstood which Manon you were refering to your bitchy story is yet to be proven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of whether I misunderstood which Manon you were refering to your bitchy story is yet to be proven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-28995</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-28995</guid>
		<description>But in the end, I was right, and you all had to admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But in the end, I was right, and you all had to admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kashania</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-28994</link>
		<dc:creator>kashania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-28994</guid>
		<description>If your prophecies were constantly ignored, you&#039;d be bitchy too! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your prophecies were constantly ignored, you&#8217;d be bitchy too! <img src='http://parterre.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Enigmi</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-28992</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Enigmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-28992</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected and offer appologies to Cassandra.  I misread your post thinking you were refering to Fleming&#039;s Manon.

Though I will add that Cassandra doesn&#039;t need to be such a nasty bitch about it...it was a misunderstanding and a simple correction would have sufficed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected and offer appologies to Cassandra.  I misread your post thinking you were refering to Fleming&#8217;s Manon.</p>
<p>Though I will add that Cassandra doesn&#8217;t need to be such a nasty bitch about it&#8230;it was a misunderstanding and a simple correction would have sufficed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Enigmi</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-28991</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Enigmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-28991</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected and offer appologies to Cassandra.  I misread your post thinking you were refering to Fleming&#039;s Manon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected and offer appologies to Cassandra.  I misread your post thinking you were refering to Fleming&#8217;s Manon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rukidn</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-12/#comment-28990</link>
		<dc:creator>Rukidn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-28990</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s the story here with Cassandra?  Isn&#039;t everyone allowed to give their own takes on what they hear in the theater?  It is their opinion.  Why can&#039;t she give her opinion.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s the story here with Cassandra?  Isn&#8217;t everyone allowed to give their own takes on what they hear in the theater?  It is their opinion.  Why can&#8217;t she give her opinion.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dow Jones</title>
		<link>http://parterre.com/2008/09/19/requiem-and-rehearsal/comment-page-11/#comment-28989</link>
		<dc:creator>Dow Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parterre.com/?p=1383#comment-28989</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been quite amused by Cassandra- she might be more fun than this evening...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been quite amused by Cassandra- she might be more fun than this evening&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 814/815 objects using apc

Served from: parterre.com @ 2012-05-26 20:53:17 -->
