10 January 2008

An Orpheus from Hell

Over the years we have heard many different versions of Gluck’s Orphée. One can choose the Vienna version for castrato, which is shorter and simpler (or better: equally difficult, but in a less spectacular way), the Paris rewrite for tenor or the Berlioz reworking for the distinguished mezzo Pauline Viardot (Anne Sophie von Otter sang this version in Stockholm a few weeks ago). In short, a singer can “play” with the role in order to show his/her ability in portraying Apollo’s son: however, any adaptation should respect the spirit of Gluck’s masterpiece.

Eh, che faro?Unfortunately, this is not the case with the Orphée which opened on January 8 in Bologna, starring Roberto Alagna in the main role. Together with his lesser-known brothers David (director & composer) and Frédérico (scenic designer), the French-Italian tenor presented a rather unusual patchwork, with heavy cuts (almost all the dances and the great aria “L’espoir renaît dans mon âme” are omitted, while “Objet de mon amour” has been reduced to a single stanza) and the tenor part rewritten in a lower key, in order to fit in with Alagna’s chronic problems with the high register.

Moreover, the role of Amour (originally sung by a soprano) has been reassigned to a baritone: in fact, instead of the God of Love, we have a gravedigger who leads a modern-day Orphée into a death cell in order to save his wife from a group of mummies. In the third act, Eurydice attempts to seduce the gravedigger, threatening to elope with him. Orphée decides he has to look at her in order not to lose her again(!) She dies, of course, and Orphée chooses to be buried with her. (Apparently, Alagna didn’t like the original happy ending).

Now, all this may sound like a bad dream, or at least a cheap mise en scène of an Offenbach operetta, but that is just what Alagna’s Orphée is about. One can understand that such a humble singer as Alagna might have wanted an Orphée to call his own, yet he’d better have written it together with his oh-so-smart little brothers, instead of stealing Gluck’s name for this trivial farce. Yet, we cannot forget that such a shame also involves both the opera house’s superintendent Marco Tutino and the musical director of the show, Giampaolo Bisanti, whose bland interpretation and eccentric tempos (too fast in the pit, too slow on stage, the pairing of these two musical realms being a mere accident) made a bad thing worse.

Alagna shouted like he was singing Cavalleria Rusticana on a bad evening in a big house (Bologna’s theater is rather small), but the voice is too thin and not well projected, while what remains of the high register is often off key. His Eurydice, Serena Gamberoni, is a tiny sopranino, with a non-existent low register and shrilling high notes, in the manner of old-fashioned soubrettes. French baritone Marc Barrard was the grotesque, wobbly Amour. Audience reaction was mixed: a few loud booe and a big round of applause. Gluck turned into a poor imitation of Mascagni? Who cares, as long as we have The Brothers Alagna! -- Antonio Tamburini

Labels: ,



30 Comments:

Blogger armerjaquino said...

Never mind Orphee, he's obviously going to be doing Torch Song Trilogy next, if that pic's anything to go by.

January 10, 2008 5:26 PM  
Blogger scifisci said...

this sounds like a bad, not-so-funny joke. This is unbelievable. How can alagna call himself a singer let alone a musician.

January 10, 2008 5:31 PM  
Blogger stignani2 said...

A medical question -- what's going on with that hand?

January 10, 2008 6:13 PM  
Anonymous Omonumento said...

What is a reputable house like Bologna doing taking on a hairbrained project like this in the first place?

The opera establishment seems determined to view Alagna as a star, which somehow he has never quite been ...

January 10, 2008 6:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The keys to the Kingdom have been passed on to the likes of such a philistine.

January 10, 2008 6:56 PM  
Blogger Donna Anna said...

If you can bear it, you can listen to Alagna warble "J'ai perdu..." (quoi? Ma raison? Mon bon sens?) courtesy of Parsifal. Those erratic tempi are the fault of both singer and conductor. Nothing special about Alagna's singing although at least his diction is clear, if not his vision.

http://parsifal79.blogspot.com/2008/01/i-know-what-you-did-last-night.html

January 10, 2008 7:51 PM  
Anonymous Hans Lick said...

Such rudeness about the brothers Alagna! They did wonders repairing my Citroen a few years ago, and the Saab purrs like a kitten except when a certain bitchy Romanian soprano is on the radio.

What I mean is: these boys are superb in their proper fach. Luring them out of it was never a good idea. But their talent is not in doubt!

January 10, 2008 9:06 PM  
Anonymous Nerva Nelli said...

Best Orfeo since Peter Hofmann!

Watch certain segments of the French musical press-- and the next Met PLAYBILL puff piece on Alagna-- treat this as a triumph.

January 10, 2008 10:44 PM  
Blogger Constantine A. Papas said...

Some ego-driven artists, throughout history, follow the path of self-distruction, and they never stop until they succeed. Alagna violated artistic responsibility and integrity by walking out of La Scala. Then he found some redemption at the Met, but ego and self-worthiness, again, take over. The Bologna paradigm- and the degree of talent is irrelevant- clearly shows that artistic freedom and innovation do not justify assassination and forgery of any art form, as it was originally conceived by its creator.

January 10, 2008 11:47 PM  
Blogger Daniel said...

This post has been removed by the author.

January 11, 2008 12:13 AM  
Blogger Daniel said...

This post has been removed by the author.

January 11, 2008 12:17 AM  
Blogger Daniel said...

This post has been removed by the author.

January 11, 2008 12:40 AM  
Blogger Maury D'annato said...

In fairness, troubles with his top or no, I believe Alagna required a rewrite from what is not a tenor role but an haute-contre, no? It is indeed very high-lying, and many tenors would struggle with it.

January 11, 2008 12:47 AM  
Anonymous Il tenore di coloratura superba said...

Not for nothing, but I called it when I first saw it. I didn't know they were going to mutilate the score like that. It's a shame. I admit, I do prefer the Paris version of the opera to the original (and not just because I'm a tenor and sing the role), but Gluck, by that point, had matured in such a way that his re-working of the opera really does, in my opinion, improve it: insomuch that many consider Orphée a completely different opera from Orfeo. The orchestration is fuller, the ballet music far more interesting, the recitatives filled out: it's a true masterpiece, and it's nice to have the contrast of a male voice with the sopranos, whereas the original, for my ears, is a bit too homogenous.

January 11, 2008 12:52 AM  
Blogger Ruxton said...

This post has been removed by the author.

January 11, 2008 3:22 AM  
Blogger Ruxton said...

This post has been removed by the author.

January 11, 2008 3:40 AM  
Blogger Ruxton said...

Sorry for all the deletes folks- all part of an exercise to swap my blog name Daniel back to my original blog name of Ruxton.
It's been done now so "Daniel" can rest in peace ;0)

January 11, 2008 5:34 AM  
Anonymous NitkitAh said...

maury, all the room in the world for a lyric tenor with a blown instrument? He was hideous at La Scala, hideous in behaviour and believing he could sing Radames. Gelb's house is more condusive for this media driven "side show". If it gets publicity he considers it a triumph.
This was rank. and everyone knows it. Ego run a ground. No one really cares, though right, Maury? As if you would know.
Rewrites are one thing, this was urination on a great piece of music for concept te'=at'ter/ someone should wake Mr. Gheorghiu up.How far down is Italy on the music chain? This used to be the premiere house after scala.

January 11, 2008 6:42 AM  
Anonymous tannengrin said...

'The Three Alagnas' - that sounds like a bad circus act, and, apparently, it is.

January 11, 2008 10:56 AM  
Anonymous Alex said...

I didn't hear nor see that Orphee and sincerly, I don't really care about that opera. Surely a masterpiece and a cornerstone in opera history but just don't is my type. And it seems there is plenty of CD and other productions to compensate that unfortunate one.
I just saw the Scala Aida on DVD. I always tought that beside Alfredo and Fenton, Alagna had nothing to do in a Verdi role. I found is Verdi CD few years ago kind of cross-over like: weird, not defintively unintersting but not something to care about either. I was then quite pleased to hear and see his Radames for the first part. Beside a missing diminuendo at the end of Celeste Aida (but few even real Radames do it) the voice sound nice and sufficiently heavy. Things began to get bad in the Nile act where the part is more dramatic. He was inadequate in the duet with Amneris and really bad in the tomb duet (falsetto!!!! yurk!).
Like many other he needs a good agent to reorientate is carrer toward parts that really suit him, even if it's less ego-pleasing. But one has to admit that Orphée was an original idea. Even if the result is bad, it's good to see some curiosity in a quite unusual music for him.

January 11, 2008 10:57 AM  
Blogger Kashania said...

I'm not familiar with the French version of the opera but I do know that the tenor role is very high-lying and is probably a haute-contre role as Maury as said. Why would Alagna even consider this role at this point in his career? Perhaps this would have worked at the outset of his career but it's clearly a bad fit for him. The only thing about it that makes sense is that the role is in French and Alagna excells in the French rep. Other than that, I'm just puzzled that he would even consider this project, let alone carrying through with it in the manner described by the post.

January 11, 2008 11:13 AM  
Blogger Straussmonster said...

When Gluck revised Orfeo into Orphee (I completely agree with the comments that it's a very different opera; the added music changes the balance and form of the piece) he tailored the title role for Joseph Legros, who was the leading haute-contre and had created several Rameau roles.

Orphee is the most haute-contre of all the Gluck tenor roles, and as such, has to be approached with caution by singers who might essay Renaud and Pylades without problems.

January 11, 2008 12:19 PM  
Blogger JATM2063 said...

He probably did Orfeo because Placido Domingo recently sang in Iphiginie at the MET, n'est-ce pas? Of course he wants that in people's minds, "Alagna is the new Domingo." There is also an (incorrect) perception among musicians in general that if someone sings baroque repertoire they are serious and highly cultured, although in fact they aren't any better than the people who eschew baroque repertoire. I suppose that next he'll make a recording of The Barber of Seville, singing Figaro, with AG as Rosina.

January 11, 2008 3:18 PM  
Blogger Straussmonster said...

Okay, I'm listening to this now, and I don't understand it at all. Truncated overture into the dance that should end the second act into the funeral pantomime music (thus omitting the opening cry of 'Eurydice!') into what I think is a choral version of 'Tendre Amour'.

Not to be crude, but what the fuck?

January 11, 2008 9:14 PM  
Anonymous Prima La Voce said...

Prima La Voce
There is nothing quite like walking off the stage during a performance in the most historic opera house in the world to enhance ones career. Has the world of opera become so base that it's so called knowledgable audience would worship such disfunction and mediocrity? Is it so important that this man remain a star? Do we really need him? It is apparent that he has little love for his audience and little respect for the composer. Opera has become a circus freak show and this guy is the ring master. The Golden Age of Opera has long gone and a tarnished brass urn containing the tears of those who remember has taken its place in STANDING ROOM. REST IN PEACE.

January 12, 2008 9:42 AM  
Blogger NYCOQ said...

I have to ask this question because I did not hear him live until the Faust (old production) a few years back. Was there ever a point when he sounded good? What I remember from the Faust was that I thought his throat was going to explode. I caught his Radames during Gelb's mega-tenor-replacement-publicity stunt earlier in the first half of the Met's season. I can say that I judged his voice without prejudice. I arrived about 2 minutes before the curtain and I did not have a chance to see that he was going on. I just remember thinking during the Celeste Aida - "God this guy sounds like Alagna, but worse". The one or two things on youtube are gawd awful.

For those that live in NYC - remember the run on cd's when Tower records closed? I remember going back repeatedly and up until they almost closed - in the opera vocal artists section - there was nothing left but Alagna cd's. For those that don't live in NYC imagine a huge glassed-in room stripped bare - except for those 20 or so Alagna cd's.

January 12, 2008 10:21 AM  
Blogger scifisci said...

yes nycoq i do remember! All those DG re-releases of CDs nobody wanted to listen to in the first place. There were also a bunch of his wife's CD's too.

January 12, 2008 12:13 PM  
Blogger NYCOQ said...

But really is there some reason why at one point people were thinking that he was the "fourth" tenor? I only ask because I didn't buy into the hype early in his career and never purchased a cd or trekked anywhere to hear him sing. None of my trusted opera mentors had placed him on my radar. There must have been a kernel of something there that made people take notice.

I must admit that the few times I have seen his wife I was impressed and I got what people were geeking out about. I did not run out and by a cd, but at least I felt her talent deserved attention.

January 12, 2008 1:55 PM  
Anonymous Lydia Language said...

I've liked Alagna a couple of times -- as Don Jose (he sounded good even in a cast with Borodina and Pape!), as Nemorino, as Faust (the new production, first month). Don't care for his Italian. He's certainly not a major artist but one of the top twenty tenors. You know, a cut ahead of Bocelli and Groban.

What absolutely killed me was his statement, "We're hoping to have major careers. Not like, say, Joan Sutherland -- she didn't have such a big career."

Artists who believe, even coin, their own hype are an ancient tradition; so are idiots who believe them. For the record: I've heard his wife once or twice and wasn't impressed with her either.

January 13, 2008 1:26 AM  
Anonymous Regina delle fate said...

Alagna's first Roméo at Covent Garden was something special - not in terms of timbre perhaps - it was always on the greyish side à la Kraus, but to hear a tenor who could actually sing audible French, looked good and who's voice was evenly produced seemed like manna from heaven in 1994. Unfortunately it went quickly downhill from there, especially after EMI got their mits on him and Draculetta. He has never had enough bloom and ping on the voice for most of the Italian rep. The Nemorino from Lyon is nice, though.

January 13, 2008 5:37 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home