14 January 2008

Lucia di DVD

Guest critic Niel Rishoi reviews the VAI DVD release of Lucia di Lammermoor.

OK, this is IT. Barring the cuts, this is the Lucia of Gaetano Donizetti. Not that misguided travesty at the Met, not Natalie Dessay's vocally juddery overwoughtness. No schtick, no Carol Burnetting around. Just Donizetti and Cammarano's Romantic drama, pure and simple. Real artists, real singers. Performing it straight, as if their lives depended on it. No gimmicks. No BS. You watch this 40 year old performance, and you see and hear a kind of authority and rightness of approach that just doesn't happen often nowadays Here we have music. Here is all the garlic, red wine, passion and organic Italian musical DRAMA. The action contained within the singing. It's a miracle, nothing less.

The picture is a bit grainy, the sets standard issue. Does it matter? Give me a break (NO).

We start with Bergonzi. Tenore supremo. Short, stumpy (yet handsome here), gestures of stock vintage. Yet, he creates drama through voice alone;"Vi disperda!" cuts right to the bone. Debonair in the old-fashioned manner. Ardent, the ultimate tenor hero. Perfect. Voice, voice voice - in awesome form here. "Fra poco a me ricovero" just splendid: it's met with a roaring ovation. Bergonzi and Scotto do not have the sensual interplay of Ricciarelli and Carreras - they don't make a lot of eye contact and are sometimes hilariously buried in their own "work" - but they are together all the way vocally and musically.

Zanasi. "Another" Italian baritone of his time, extinct today. A darkly handsome man, he has a commanding presence. He sings a solid "Cruda, funesta smania," beginning with a slightly muscular overemphasis, yet it suits the piece; but the line, upper extensions of ease, and expression is just right.

Plinio Clabassi. A Raimondo of unusually fine caliber, with a mellow, steady, consummately produced tone - he evinces a genuine control over it, and uses it flexibly - no park and bark approach here. Moreover, he makes the character figure prominently: he really delivers a tale in his "Dalle stanze, ove Lucia," setting up the mad scene fittingly.

Whoever said Scotto was a second-stringer should be thumped on the head, then made to hasten and acquire this release. She is spectacular, nothing short of miraculous here. What may have been accepted as standard then registers as something extraordinary now. Scotto is in marvelous voice: that brisk, tangy sound, slightly piercing on high, is bracingly clear, pure and perfectly steady throughout. She has never sounded more appealing, nor so classically Italianate in tone and manner. Her coloratura, while not of Sutherlandian velocity, is neat, in place, and confidently deployed. Trills are not a prominent thing of disctict articulation, yet they are discerned - and importantly, uses them effectively in the line where called for. High notes pop out quite strongly. What's most important here is she does that all-important shaping and binding of lines into an expressive whole; she has a way of magically "dropping in" and connecting phrases, with a wide range of dynamics, and her diction is an absolute joy - no alteration of vowels or slushing over of them. She makes every word clear, and meaningful. The line in "Regnava nel silenzio" is ideal, true, unfussed, yet so very sustained on a level of gripping narrative. "Verranno a te sull'are" is pristinely, gorgeously sung, as is "Soffriva nel pianto." This kind of cantabile singing should be taken heed by any budding Lucia today.


But what is most especially distinctive is that in each isolated number, she tells a story. You see in her face, the spontaneity of her delivery of the words and expressions, how they register upon the listener as internal thoughts, given out to the audience. What's most important here, though, is that she is so not trying to force external gimmicks onto the characterization. The question never forms in the mind, what kind of a character is Lucia? A spineless wimp? Sick from the start? A mad hatter? No, the Lucia here is one that uninformed individuals will never understand: she is a 19th century Romantic heroine, a girl in love with Edgardo. Scotto reacts in each episode as if the character were hearing the statements of the others in the story for the first time. It has a uniquely-alive spontaneity, unusually free of calculation. I'm sick of the discussion of whether Lucia is mentally ill from the start, based on her occult meanderings in "Regnava nel silenzio;" if anyone knew of literature, religious superstitions and so forth of that time, these were conventional devices in Romantic melodramas. Ghosts and apparitions are commonplace. So, then, Scotto just accepts Cammarano's text, and tells it without any manipulation or presumption. She or we do not think Lucia mentally ill from the get-go.

Scotto's emotional honesty never falters, not once. She is convincing in the scene with Enrico, bringing just the right amount of anguish, her reactions often touching; in "Se tradirmi," you see her pleading to God most plausibly. In the wedding scene, Scotto is riveting, and does what Mariella Devia had a hard time establishing in her La Scala 1992 video: show the abject despair and desolation of Lucia, as the hope drains out of her. Devia has the astounding vocal technique that kept her singing better longer, but she does not have, by a considerable margin, Scotto's all-abiding charisma and out-there personality. Back to the Wedding Scene: the sextet, onto the end of the act, just sizzles and explodes with drama - those voices just pour out with thrilling abandon. Exciting stuff, this.

After all my extravagance of description, I'll have to think of ways to go further concerning the Mad Scene: it's a revelation. One of the best, hands down, I have ever seen performed. Every American soprano and all directors should watch this. This is how it should be done. In the service of the music, no gimmicks.

Scotto is in her element. Intensely musical, letting the scene flow with astonishing naturalness. Again, she's telling a story. The audience doesn't see this, but the TV viewer does: close-ups reveal the soprano absolutely into her music/storymaking. Scotto has the audience confidently in the palm of her hand, but not for a moment is she calculating or manipulative: it is, rather, an artist in full sureness and specific aim in what she is doing - she's fascinating to watch at every point, you can't take your eyes off her. She's living the situation moment by moment. We get no hysterics, no forced "mad acting" or cheap effects (which I despise). Lucia is totally removed from reality, in her childlike state, moving around like a little ghost in her own little but all-consuming world. Apart from a few moments of fright (the "il fantasma" sequence is powerful), she's deliriously happy, living out her bliss with Edgardo. Most of all, though, finally, you get the full power and pathos of what Donizetti intended. Scotto weds the text with the music so skillfully so that you get the full effect how how beautifully they complement each other. She does not allow the music to be compromised, so she takes care to make all the actions fit in, rather than standing out, as is the wont of too many a soprano. Scotto's bravura accomplishment is a triumph, and what a fortuitous circumstance that these documents exist, and that we have privy to them.

The bows and biz in the lengthy applause after the flute with cadenza, is however, pure Scotto. She steps out of character to acknowledge the ovation. No objections at all; it is decidedly part of the show. Very much like Cossotto, oh thank thank you, oh so humble me but I deserve it. I'm beginning to think these kinds of self-possessed artists, who don't display false modesty very well, are the lastingly memorable artists. Infinite self-belief, a healthy dose of the imperious ego, wanting to please, absolutely certain of their merit, and a kind of inborn dementedness: it translates into a very personal charisma, which defines who they are. They're to be preferred. We want personalities, a personal statement, an individual MO. Wallflowers, generic, unidentifiable, pedantic, please go home.

Without a doubt, this is the video Lucia of choice. Even though it's cut, it retains and fleshes out the truest spirit of the piece. -- Niel Rishoi

VAI DVD 4418 Lucia: Renata Scotto; Edgardo: Carlo Bergonzi; Enrico: Mario Zanasi; Raimondo: Plinio Clabassi; Arturo: Angelo Marchiandi; Alisa: Mirella Fiorentini; Normanno: Giuseppe Baratti. NHK Symphony Orchestra, Bruno Bartoletti. Japan, 1967.

Labels: , , ,



23 Comments:

Anonymous Alex said...

Does Scotto give any note higher the C? I know it's absurd and superficial but, unlike Norma, an under-C Lucia is a killer for me...

January 14, 2008 3:40 PM  
Blogger La Cieca said...

Alex: As La Cieca recalls, Scotto sings the "standard" high notes, e.g., D-natural at the end of "Quando rapita" and the duet with Enrico, D-flats at the end of the Sextet and Act 2 finale, and the usual 2 high E-flats in the Mad Scene.

January 14, 2008 3:45 PM  
Anonymous Prima La Voce said...

I heard Lopardo do Edgardo at the MET. It was outstanding.

January 14, 2008 4:03 PM  
Blogger NYCOQ said...

This review is compelling me to purchase this dvd RIGHT NOW! Thank God I am not the only person who finds Dessay "overwrought".

January 14, 2008 4:14 PM  
Anonymous Helena Handbasket said...

Premiere Opera has this same performance for considerably less cash. It is "marred" by Japanese subtitles (don't bother me much since I can't read any Japanese).

January 14, 2008 4:59 PM  
Blogger scifisci said...

I have this DVD and it is GREAT. and yes, she does do all the standard high notes. everything is just as it "should" be here. And to tell the truth, I like the cuts. The recent MET production should have been cut, especially with that random wolfs crag set that looked like mary zimmerman forgot it was in the score and threw it together the night before

January 14, 2008 5:27 PM  
Blogger Lindoro said...

I find it funny how people think that Scotto always had a wobble, or that she always sang the dramatic rep she came to be known for at the Met.

At the beginning of her career, she sang the standard coloratura rep: Lucia, Butterfly, Gilda, Norina, Guilietta, Amina, etc.

I saw and owned this on VHS and I think it is fantastic. No gimmicks or overproducing.

Am I the only one in the world that thought that the new Met Lucia was not all that bad? I found it quite respectful to the time period that it was chosen to be set in. Except for the assisted suicide, Giordani's awful Edgardo, and the non-set for the Storm scene, I thought it was all quite effective.

January 14, 2008 7:20 PM  
Blogger scifisci said...

butterfly isn't exactly standard coloratura rep.....

I don't think the MET lucia was a debacle or disaster, but it wasn't sufficient to stand alone without a diva to carry it.

January 14, 2008 8:36 PM  
Anonymous regina delle fate said...

I knew you lot would live to rue the day you said all those nasty things about Scotto. I think the Luisa Miller from the Met and the Manon Lescaut are among my favourite videos and her 1967 Butterfly recording has never been surpassed and never will be. So she screamed and wobbled a bit in later years - I don't care! She was a genuine artista and her like doesn't exist today.

January 14, 2008 8:58 PM  
Blogger Lindoro said...

Butterfly might not be standard coloratura rep, but it was meant to be. Those roles that I mention were all (for the most part) shared between Scotto and Rosina Storchio, the creator of Butterfly.

I have said it before, we might love butterflies with big voices, but the ones that seem to get casted most often are the ones with lyric voices. Who did the met choose to sing the 94 production? A former coloratura. Who came to sine the new Mimgela production? A singer that had only done Mimi in the house.

Butterfly is usually best served with dramatic coloraturas or full lyric, not dramatic sopranos. The problem is that most conductors usually are too busy to hear anybody but themselves.

January 14, 2008 9:49 PM  
Blogger scifisci said...

butterfly might have at one time been the domain of coloraturas, however it was also sung in a different vocal tradition. As such, scotto's interpretation was NOT in this tradition. She sang it quite dramatically, pushing her voice to the limits and achieved glorious results. Had she sung it in a "coloratura" way, she would have sung it along the lines of say, toti dal monte, however this was not the case at all.
The only reason CGD was chosen was because she was petite. And she was anything but a light, refined lyric. Her butterfly was a juddering, horrifying mess. Butterfly is only served well by lighter voices that can narrow their vocal production and project the final act effectively. Scotto could do this, however who can do this today? Certainly not CGD. Also, malfitano was never a coloratura soprano (though she sang fiorello i believe), she was a lyric, and by 1994 had abandoned even those roles.

January 14, 2008 10:09 PM  
Blogger sugarmezzo said...

Frank Lopardo is a Rock Star.

January 14, 2008 11:25 PM  
Blogger Charlie B said...

Who is "Lopardo do Edgardo" - a new Portuguese or Brasilian singer perhaps?

Could La Cieca possibly take some obscure pleasure from this review? I certainly was DELIGHTED to see the frequent references to acting with the voice, to interacting vocally - without which any amount of histrionics is beside the point.

I have been listening to Scotto a lot recently and found the review was very accurate, right down to acknowledging the sometimes hard sound in the upper register. I heard a 1967 recording of "Lucia" excerpts with Scotto (possibly one of the fillers in an "Unnatural Acts" podcast) and was just blown away.

January 15, 2008 1:35 AM  
Anonymous Popp Fanatic said...

I haven't got this DVD (perhaps I should, I like Scotto) but I'll now ask a question I've always meant to ask:

Am I the only person in the universe who found the recent Met Lucia production rather effective? Am I a strange animal of some sort? If yes, what kind of animal exactly?

I day that because it seems it's become fashionable, both here and -particularly- Opera-L, to bash this production as gimmicky and pretentious or worse. I honestly can't understand this. I found it very good indeed. OK, my opinion is partly due to my personal dislike of traditional stagings; although this wasn't modern, I liked the attempt to use the quasi-gothic imagery of an Emily Bronte-like caricature of the mid 19th century to accentuate the silly quasi-gothicness of the libretto. I loved the set. And I particularly loved that universally vilified wedding photographer. I thought it captured the psycopathic nature of the sextect particularly well.

"Lucia" has some of the best music that Donizzetti ever wrote, and he's probably the one bel canto bloke that I can tolerate (BC is just not my thing, thank you very much). But the libretto is mind-numbingly silly. Admit it. Well, this was the first time that it has ever made sense to me, and the credit is all Dessay's. For the first time in my life I saw this as it was probably meant to be: a nice, but always slightly light-on-the-head, overemotional girl, who gets gradually unhinged at her brother's relentless bullying and finally goes completely bonkers. Now, everybody always focuses on the "completely bonkers" bit of Lucia. Well, Dessay's accomplishment was really to make the "gradual unhinging" credible. She was brilliant. Not gimmicky, not pretentious. Just brilliant.

January 15, 2008 4:00 AM  
Anonymous Krunoslav said...

Go Niel! This is a fabulous release I have enjoyed for years.

I showed Bergonzi's Final Scene to a bunch of conservatory student singers who had never heard of him and they went nuts ( as does the Tokyo audience).

Um-- Storchio or no, the version of BUTTERFLY we are used to hearing today was largely premiered by Salomea Krusceniski, drammatico-spinto who sang Aida, the FORZA Leonora, Isolde, Brünnhilde, Elektra and Salome.

January 15, 2008 6:50 AM  
Blogger Lindoro said...

"Storchio or no, the version of BUTTERFLY we are used to hearing today was largely premiered by Salomea Krusceniski, drammatico-spinto who sang Aida, the FORZA Leonora, Isolde, Brünnhilde, Elektra and Salome."

Maybe, but most of the music composed for Storchio remained. Act II and Act III had very little changes as to the music sung by Butterfly. Most of her arias ramained unchanged in terms of tessitura, and even basic melodic structure. The music might have been sung by an Isolde, but it was still written for a Norina.

January 15, 2008 8:02 AM  
Blogger paddypig said...

I have this video, and of course Scotto is my favorite singer, and for those of us who only saw her in the eighties doing Puccini and Verdi, this was a revelation to see her in her early career. Filmed a few years later there is also a wonderful Faust from Tokyo with Renata, Alfredo and Nicholai, and from 73 there is a video (with very bad costumes for Renata unfortunately) of Traviata from Japan with a very young and very adorable Jose Carreras. They are three real gems of Scotto in the late sixties and early seventies. Sadly there is no video of her Butterfly other than a very poor private video of her last Butterlfy in Verona in 87. When will the Met wake up and release her Trittico (makes Fritoli look like the dull wallflower she is in last years Angelica)

January 15, 2008 1:12 PM  
Blogger paddypig said...

also, the VAI copy is a huge improvement in quality over the bootleg copies from any of the other companies

January 15, 2008 1:31 PM  
Anonymous iltenoredigrazia said...

Having had the pleasure of seeing Scotto live as Lucia at the Met in 1971, the review tells me nothing that I didn't know. Other recordings of her Lucia also show an outstanding artist. High notes? Oh boy, believe me, she had them and she could hold on to them. They were strong and she loved to show them off. Some of you may want to check the recital she gave in Moscow when La Scala visited in 1964 or so.

January 15, 2008 1:52 PM  
Anonymous opera in the uk said...

I'm sure I will see this performance at some point out of curiousity, but I'm afriad the review did nothing for me.

Trying to make opera a vital dramatic art form does not seem to me a bad thing.

I agree that you need the singers who can meet the challenge, but my heart sinks when I see singers lining up at the front of the stage, weighed down by most trad amd ornate costumes possible. Or worse standing ten feet apart, not even bothering to make eye contact.

Yesterday I suffered the Met's Don Carlo with Domingo, Freni and Bumbry from the 1980s. All singers I love, but just standing there, or walking up stage and down stage in the the so-called grand manner. In such cases, I can only say that, to me, great singing is not enough.

I was bored.

January 15, 2008 4:28 PM  
Blogger Ruxton said...

sounds like you need to swap to rock concerts, opera in the uk. It's hard to see how opera could ever please you without boring you.

January 15, 2008 9:42 PM  
Blogger Charlie B said...

I remember going to one of those "Don Carlo" performances. As I recall there was a Bumbry "claque" present - the only time I have ever encountered such a phenomenon. They cheered endlessly for Grace, BOO-ed Freni, and tried to start fights with anyone who complained. (Such passion without a hint of a Great Actress on stage!)

January 15, 2008 9:46 PM  
Anonymous anon- said...

typical fop briitish propaganda.

stay home by all means, or wait for the red frock of Netremko to give you a silly twirl to feel like la dame aux camilia is singing just for you. indicating all over the stage with a smile that passes for acting, and a press corp now firmly in her grasp. DON"T listen to the words, so beautiful and haunting when understood in the italian, and of course Verdi's music is so tedious......NOT.

All you fops that like the opera acted will end up with what you deserve, anorexic freaks with no tone= broadway bound caliber voices, and no hint of style because that which is not asked for will fall away in the hush of the bad press agent. I want front stage, I want a voice that wants to give me the score as respected and beautiful as they can.
Callas bemoaned the arirval of Moffo for the same reasons. "she skims over the music and ..." everyone knew who she meant. She was right to sound the alarm. Looks are wonderful, but they are not everything. we are heading for some truly boring days ahead.

January 16, 2008 2:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home