Too much casta, not enough diva
Last night's season premiere of Norma at the Met restored Bellini's opera to musical and vocal distinction but the dramatic fire was burning only fitfully.
Hasmik Papian is a hugely experienced Norma who some consider to be the best contemporary exponent of the role. But the key word here is contemporary not best. Her voice is not the conventional soprano drammatica d'agilita (with more or less agility) that has been associated with the role in the past. Instead it is a bright, high-placed floaty soprano of medium size. The tonal quality is an intriguing and not unattractive mixture of copper and silver. Gold and platinum probably are the elements needed for this role but she wasn't dealing in base vocal metals.
However, it is a voice without a great deal of variety of tonal color and the lower middle register is weak and colorless. This meant that this druidess shone in moments of reflection, tenderness and lyricism like the "Casta diva", "Ah, rimembranza" and "Deh, non volerli vittime" but fell way short in moments of wild anger and dark threatening command. The coloratura was decent but not brilliant. Some of the tricky runs were finessed and the climactic high C's were short and hardly effortless. Vocal thrust and command were in short supply all night. Her weakest moment of the evening was the second act trio with Pollione and Adalgisa. Here Papian seemed lost and clueless as to how to make an effect. She lacks really exciting vocal attack and could not dominate the ensemble. However, Papian did stronger work in the final scenes with solid vocalism and shone in the final moving scenes of renunciation and self-sacrifice.
Papian, a slim shapely woman who was sporting three newly designed and created gowns in blue crushed silk, russet velvet and scarlet velvet with gold accents was an unusually youthful and feminine Norma. One wondered what Pollione and the Gauls were intimidated by. Her anger came across more as agitated distress and her threats seemed mere sarcastic insinuation. The real emotional depths of the part seemed sketched in skilfully but not fully plumbed.
This was contrasted against the heroic yet vulnerable Adalgisa of Dolora Zajick who had the attack and vocal breadth but also depth of feeling and variety of color as the junior priestess. I think in the 19th century Zajick would have been a Norma with whatever adjustments to the vocal line were needed for her comfort and endurance in the role. Zajick showed herself a mistress of vocal coloration and dynamic control. Like Cossotto she removed a lot of the steel and chest coloration from her tone and sang Adalgisa with gentle purity to suggest a virginal, innocent and youthful woman. The soprano-like tone did not preclude power and richness when appropriate but informed the tonal palette - she most often chose to end phrases piano rather than forte and didn't slam into low notes. She performed a flawless messa di voce on "Io l'obbliai" and also managed a pianissimo high C in the second act. Dolora had the grandeur both vocal and physical that Papian lacked.
Franco Farina is a confounding artist, seemingly a Jekyll and Hyde vocalist. A superb musician with excellent technical control in lyrical legato lines and piano singing, he devolves into a braying, wobbling, unmusical shouter when he attempts robusto heroics. At times it seems that a Pertile or Bergonzi are within him fighting for his soul against Baum and Mauro. The whining, blown-out upper middle tones were contrasted against a firm, bright and expert shaped line in cantilena. He managed a superb piano tone in the duet with Adalgisa and when striving for line and style was really impressive. But here or there a loosening tone or shouted high note would intrude and remind you of his dark side. The costume suited him and he worked well with both ladies.
Vitalij Kowaljow poured on rich velvet tones in the musically rich but dramatically uninteresting role of Oroveso. Juliana di Giacomo gave notice of a major soprano voice in the small role of Clotilde in her Met debut. The two boys playing Norma's children were given more specific direction including reaching out for their mother in the last scene with moving results.
I happened to like the conducting of Maurizio Benini who stressed the dramatic weight and symphonic qualities of the score while not slighting elegance and forward movement. This score too often has fallen into the hands of routiniers and this was a step in the right direction.
I won't devote much space to John Copley's production and John Conklin's sets because they don't deserve it. Norma is an opera that seems to confound modern directors. Why Norma decorated her house with wooden crates painted black is not something this inquiring mind wanted to know. Sometimes it looked like a high school production of Shakespeare's Macbeth or a minimalist Camelot. Laurie Feldman who staged this revival attempted some creative choral movement but it was pretty much park and bark. Despite the cheapo minimalist look they might as well have been singing in front of musty old drops of Stonehenge and paper maché rocks.
After the dismal last two outings with a way past-it Renata Scotto (please no historical revisionism here - she could not sing the role by the time she got to the Met) and a never-really-had-it lumpen Jane Eaglen, last night restored Bellini's opera to musical respectability. One could get a sense of its greatness, particularly when Zajick was center stage. But the real fire and ice was last seen with Caballé in 1976 and we are still awaiting her successor. -- Gualtier Maldè
Hasmik Papian is a hugely experienced Norma who some consider to be the best contemporary exponent of the role. But the key word here is contemporary not best. Her voice is not the conventional soprano drammatica d'agilita (with more or less agility) that has been associated with the role in the past. Instead it is a bright, high-placed floaty soprano of medium size. The tonal quality is an intriguing and not unattractive mixture of copper and silver. Gold and platinum probably are the elements needed for this role but she wasn't dealing in base vocal metals.
However, it is a voice without a great deal of variety of tonal color and the lower middle register is weak and colorless. This meant that this druidess shone in moments of reflection, tenderness and lyricism like the "Casta diva", "Ah, rimembranza" and "Deh, non volerli vittime" but fell way short in moments of wild anger and dark threatening command. The coloratura was decent but not brilliant. Some of the tricky runs were finessed and the climactic high C's were short and hardly effortless. Vocal thrust and command were in short supply all night. Her weakest moment of the evening was the second act trio with Pollione and Adalgisa. Here Papian seemed lost and clueless as to how to make an effect. She lacks really exciting vocal attack and could not dominate the ensemble. However, Papian did stronger work in the final scenes with solid vocalism and shone in the final moving scenes of renunciation and self-sacrifice.
Papian, a slim shapely woman who was sporting three newly designed and created gowns in blue crushed silk, russet velvet and scarlet velvet with gold accents was an unusually youthful and feminine Norma. One wondered what Pollione and the Gauls were intimidated by. Her anger came across more as agitated distress and her threats seemed mere sarcastic insinuation. The real emotional depths of the part seemed sketched in skilfully but not fully plumbed.
This was contrasted against the heroic yet vulnerable Adalgisa of Dolora Zajick who had the attack and vocal breadth but also depth of feeling and variety of color as the junior priestess. I think in the 19th century Zajick would have been a Norma with whatever adjustments to the vocal line were needed for her comfort and endurance in the role. Zajick showed herself a mistress of vocal coloration and dynamic control. Like Cossotto she removed a lot of the steel and chest coloration from her tone and sang Adalgisa with gentle purity to suggest a virginal, innocent and youthful woman. The soprano-like tone did not preclude power and richness when appropriate but informed the tonal palette - she most often chose to end phrases piano rather than forte and didn't slam into low notes. She performed a flawless messa di voce on "Io l'obbliai" and also managed a pianissimo high C in the second act. Dolora had the grandeur both vocal and physical that Papian lacked.
Franco Farina is a confounding artist, seemingly a Jekyll and Hyde vocalist. A superb musician with excellent technical control in lyrical legato lines and piano singing, he devolves into a braying, wobbling, unmusical shouter when he attempts robusto heroics. At times it seems that a Pertile or Bergonzi are within him fighting for his soul against Baum and Mauro. The whining, blown-out upper middle tones were contrasted against a firm, bright and expert shaped line in cantilena. He managed a superb piano tone in the duet with Adalgisa and when striving for line and style was really impressive. But here or there a loosening tone or shouted high note would intrude and remind you of his dark side. The costume suited him and he worked well with both ladies.
Vitalij Kowaljow poured on rich velvet tones in the musically rich but dramatically uninteresting role of Oroveso. Juliana di Giacomo gave notice of a major soprano voice in the small role of Clotilde in her Met debut. The two boys playing Norma's children were given more specific direction including reaching out for their mother in the last scene with moving results.
I happened to like the conducting of Maurizio Benini who stressed the dramatic weight and symphonic qualities of the score while not slighting elegance and forward movement. This score too often has fallen into the hands of routiniers and this was a step in the right direction.
I won't devote much space to John Copley's production and John Conklin's sets because they don't deserve it. Norma is an opera that seems to confound modern directors. Why Norma decorated her house with wooden crates painted black is not something this inquiring mind wanted to know. Sometimes it looked like a high school production of Shakespeare's Macbeth or a minimalist Camelot. Laurie Feldman who staged this revival attempted some creative choral movement but it was pretty much park and bark. Despite the cheapo minimalist look they might as well have been singing in front of musty old drops of Stonehenge and paper maché rocks.
After the dismal last two outings with a way past-it Renata Scotto (please no historical revisionism here - she could not sing the role by the time she got to the Met) and a never-really-had-it lumpen Jane Eaglen, last night restored Bellini's opera to musical respectability. One could get a sense of its greatness, particularly when Zajick was center stage. But the real fire and ice was last seen with Caballé in 1976 and we are still awaiting her successor. -- Gualtier Maldè
Labels: gualtier malde, met











44 Comments:
I was happy to hear both verses of Norma's entrance cabaletta, but elsewhere, there were some abrupt and jarring cuts.
Agree with you for the most part, but despite Papian's skill as a singer, it was hard to hear her, at least from my seat in the Dress Circle. Benini's conducting was atrocious. The orchestra sounded lifeless during the overture. It just got worse as the evening dragged on. A superb turn from Zajick made me think last night's performance should force the Met re-bill this run as "Adalgisa, the Druidess Handmaiden." Feldman's re-staging of Copley's original stale vision has only made it worse. This isn't a production worthy of the Gelb era. Maybe Guleghina will have the fire that Papian so desperately needs. Maybe not the notes, but she'll surely give us (and Pollone) a Norma worth fearing.
One can wait for a successor to pretty much any role in the repertory, and be eternally disappointed that [insert diva's name here] isn't being matched by current singers. Turandot? Not since Nilsson ... Empress? Not since Rysanek ... Sieglinde? Not since Lotte Lehmann ... Violetta? Not since, uhm, Muzio. The point is when to settle with reality and when to recall past glories. This happy medium is not where most opera fanatics want to be found. Papian was good, but of course it can be "better" too-- nevermind that it's endlessly debatable what form that "better" really looks like. But more importantly, last night during the opera I chose to be riveted to what I was hearing, instead of making checklists and endless comparisons with recordings in my collection. I doubt that this reviewer Gualtier Malde actually heard Caballe sing Norma live, so I don't know how he can judge the intensity of the feeling during the ACTUAL ACT OF PERFORMANCE.
No, "m." I didn't see Caballé live as Norma just two videos from 1974 and 1978. However, the impact and command even in the video format was much greater because Caballé made me feel the priestess, the wronged woman and the mother every moment. Papian is a very skilled singer who would be a good Leonora in "Il Trovatore" or "Luisa Miller" or Desdemona in "Otello". But Norma needs more than just skilled singing, it needs a whole other level of vocalism and expression. I think you need to be able to express anger with real fire in this part and also command the coloratura to expressive effect, not just get through it. Again this was Papian's first night and supposedly was better than the dress rehearsal, hopefully she will settle into the role more at the Met and start to develop more authority and command.
But you don't need to have seen a great interpreter to know what the potential in a great role is. And I think that Papian is very solid and skilled and must be admired for not doing more than she is capable of in the part. But there is much more in the role and with her level of experience she needed to offer more solutions to its problems.
GM: But Norma needs more than just skilled singing, it needs a whole other level of vocalism and expression. I think you need to be able to express anger with real fire in this part and also command the coloratura to expressive effect, not just get through it.
I go back to my original point. When can we ever be ok with the performance, if it's widely accepted that Bellini wrote a killer part for Giuditta Pasta thereby ruining the chances for future generations of singers to succeed in the role. That we have notable Normas since Pasta is miraculous, I think. To hope to or expect to place a current Norma interpreter in the short line of great Normas (ending with Caballe, at least as far as New York is concerned) is natural, but it's also dangerous. Papian delivered an admirable performance of an impossible role (and I don't think she just "got through it" either); to dig up the ghosts of the 70s and prior decades, and to use this as the major thrust of one's experience of opera is a choice everyone is free to make. But I guarantee that in the next decade, or the next few decades, or more, that no one will match your Caballe videos in her ability to both do florid passages stupendously (oooh, Sutherland!) and to declaim with all the drama of a fat diva. Even some of Caballe's lesser known Normas (those that didn't make it to tape) couldn't compete with the L'Orange video.
But paradoxically, when fanatics recall the greatest singers of a role to analyze a current performance, it in effect means that the current singer has mounted a challenge to the pantheon. And more often than not, she fails colossally. Lost somewhere there is the point that she in fact delivered a performance that threatened the eternal imagined pantheon.
Please forgive my instrusion, but I think Gualtier is being really reasonable about Papian. He acknowledges her skill, but it is impossible not to notice the shortcomings. I haven´t seen her NY Norma, but listened to a broadcast maybe from Washington two years ago - and his description fits my impression back then. More than that, her Met Aida already lacked power, a decent low register and tonal variety. As much as we can live with an imperfect Norma (almost everyone is imperfect in this role - even Caballé), there must be a core to the interpretation. And any bel canto role is lifeless without tonal variety.
Not having heard the performance, I still must agree that GM has presented a very reasonable review.
M: The fact is that there are certain roles which have not been sung in a completely satisfying way for a number of years. I think there's a balance to be found between recognising the giants who have achieved greatness in certain roles while still acknowledging today's talent. Your exaggerations serve no purpose. I have yet to hear one person say that there hasn't been a satisfying Sieglinde since Lehman. In fact, great Sieglindes are a dime-a-dozen when compared to great Normas. While I don't think anyone can match Callas as Violetta, I will readily acknowledge that a number singers have achieved greatness in the roles since Callas -- Caballe, Scotto, Sills, Gherghiou...
RD: As much as we can live with an imperfect Norma (almost everyone is imperfect in this role - even Caballé), there must be a core to the interpretation. And any bel canto role is lifeless without tonal variety.
Thus there really isn't anyone since Caballe to have done justice to the role, for the likes of Sutherland, Sills, and Gruberova didn't (doesn't in Gruberova's case) have the tonal variety to bring to life Norma, and "any bel canto role" for that matter. This is a tough crowd: those who haven't even stepped into the theater are already wanting more of "tonal variety" than what Papian can deliver.
Either you all acknowledge that Scotto's Norma was good, or I shall fire you all on the spot and hire a board that will.
A. Morrell Carrington Colby Dexter Rowan
The critique by GM is, as usual, oustanding. I listened to Norma, on Sirius, and I was bored to death. For diversion, I was watching on TV dance with the stars, with the sound off! If Papian is the Norma of the moment, the opera world is in crisis. Farina disgraced himself one more time after his Radames. Zajick tried her best but it was not enough to save this vocally assassinated Norma.
Kashania: I'm sorry that your literal mind can't grasp that I was simply parroting opera queens (I among them) talking about their/our imagined pantheons, and then making the necessary exaggerations to prove a point. Of course there have been many more stellar Sieglindes since Lehmann. But the line of great Sieglindes stop with Rysanek, of course.
M: You are the one saying Sutherland, Sills and Gruberova lack tonal variety. I assume you have seen everyone of them singing the role of Norma live, because you have just stated that recordings do not allow anyone to see if a singer is able to produce mezza voce or something like that.
I did see Papian in the theatre in her prime and she didn´t use to have tonal variety back then.
Anyway, I still find Gualtier´s review reasonable. I for myself don´t have any personal relation to Ms. Papian and the fact that someone says she she is not a memorable Norma does not hurt my feelings. I guess it does not ever hurt HER feelings either...
Great review and very accurate.
Where in the house were you sitting?
I was listening to a recording of Daphne this morning and thought that Papian would be good in this type of high-lying Strauss music.
Very good review, although GM liked it more than I did. This production is so dreadful that even a Robert Wilson staging would be an improvement.
By the way, La Cieca, it's too bad you didn't have GM review an actual performance of Traviata. Instead of a biased snippet from the dress rehearsal.
M: Nah! Rysanek was great as Sieglinde but I wouldn't discount Crespin, Norman and, currently, Pieczonka. Voigt has also had great success as Sieglinde (though I find her to be interpretively bland in the role). The opera world has always had at least one great Sieglinde at any given time, unlike Norma.
One wonders why the m's of the world even bother with these opera sites, where in general it is considered acceptable and appropriate to compare singers and critique perfomances. I think it is clear that the reviewer enjoyed the performance while at the same time being dissatisfied with it. For me this describes what I most commonly feel after a performance (sometimes minus the enjoyment) - as a relative newcomer to opera (10 years) I never heard the "greats" live, and don't spend much time listening to recorded music, but I can still say that I have never yet heard a great (much less definitive) live Norma (or Violetta, or . . . .) that satisfies my musical imagination. If this is what the reviewer felt, it seems appropriate to cite singers who have in the past met his musical expectations. Kashania makes the same point above.
thomas: perhaps if we ask him very nicely, Gualtier will review "Traviata" for us as well.
I will be attending "La Traviata" on November 15th, admittedly somewhat after the premiere - I think it is the last performance of Renée's run. But everyone should be nicely settled in by then. BTW: my great Violettas live in the house (I have seen over 25!) are Gallardo-Domas, Gheorghiu and Stoyanova. Fleming is heading up the second tier. As for Sieglinde - well I liked Katarina Dalayman a lot. I will be hearing Pieczonka this year.
BTW: let's not beat up too much on Mr. "m." - he has precipitated a fascinating and intellectually stimulating debate!
GM: I, for one, would appreciate your take on La traviata. I hear that she's been behaving very nicely and that the mannerisms are all but gone.
Every time I attend Norma, there is a tension: will I want to murder the kids before Norma gets around to it? Last night, as Papian, dagger drawn, approached their bed, I murmured, "You GO, girl." Alas, it was not to be -- they even had a pointless scene in the finale.
Other than that, it was the best Norma I'd heard since Caballe-Cossotto. Which isn't saying much, is it?
(I suspect Papian will sound easier in later performances than the prima, but her acting -- a dozen poses taken from 19th-century engravings -- would all have been familiar to Giuditta Pasta, who probably invented some of them and certainly put them across better.)
- Hans Lick
Once again, thank you for the outstanding review GM. I forgot to listen to this on Sirius and will try to catch it the next time around. Still, I have heard Papian in the role in two different pirate recordings, and your observations match up perfectly with what I have heard thus far. Christopher is right that Guleg will give us the "fire", but I fear many/most of Bellini's musical thoughts will go missing. And Zajick - well, she is an outstanding artist, but ALL WRONG for this role, IMO. I would much rather hear a young, girlish Adalgisa (Garanca, di Donato, maybe even someone like Stoyanova) rather than a phenomenal large-voiced mezzo trying to SOUND like a young, girlish voice. And speaking of Zajick - I have just recently listened to her Lady Macbeth - my GOD why did she give up the role? She would have been MILES better than Guleg (much as I admire the latter).
Papian was misguided on many levels and the voice has no power, and power and fury are fundamental for at least half of the role. Still, she was a Norma worth seeing. Very moving in act 1 during the duet with Zajick. Then a very compelling job during the last 20 minutes. The voice is what it is, weak and not really pretty, but who can sing Norma today? I was more offended by Benini's ludicrous tempi.
The MET should be commended for presenting the opera at all and, for the life of me I can't understand people at home listening to these metallic broadcasts and thinking they have experienced a performance. I feel sorry for them, they can't appreciate modern singers without being haunted by the dead. Once and for all, Callas is dead, buried and soon will you. Those Sutherland Ds and Es are glorious, but let's stop living in the past.
Papian is not suitable to sing Norma, perhaps, but who wants to spend 50 years waiting around for a perfect singer capable of singing it?
I heard Caballe with Bumbry at Covent Garden (forget all that nonsense in the libretto about Adlagisa and Norma being close friends, one has to say) and Caballe was disengaged to say the least. Limited diction, some seriously aspirated coloratura, and until the last scene when she drifted pianissimos all over the place, not really much to offer. But Eaglen with Scottish Opera wasn't bad. The Muti recording was a bit later, I think, but you can see that she did have a good Norma in her at one point.
I think GM did an admirable job here, though I found him far too kind to Farina, whose consistently tasteless, bleating performances seem to encourage the Met to hire him. I've now heard him as Riccardo, Turiddu, Radames, and Pollione, hoping for a glint of promise. Nope.
Is there a chance that Zajick might undertake the title role in the next few years?
even if she does, there's no hope of ever seeing it at the MET, where she's only allowed to sing amneris and azucena.
i'm glad anonymous brought up this point about Montsi. yes, the Orange video is amazing, but she wasn't always that great. i recall reading some reviews at the time of the 1978 Normas in London, and the reviewer seemed to prefer Bumbry's Norma to Caballe's! as a matter of fact, i believe Andrew Porter reviewed Scotto's Norma at the Met a few years later, and he compared it unfavorably to Bumbry's. so i guess there's a lot of variation in people's opinions, even critics.
i think other great Normas in the past were Verrett, Deutekom, M. Price.
if you people are not satisfied with Papian, just wait until Guleghina destroys this role...
This is one of the most fascinating and interesting discussion I've read in a long while. A few observations: When Callas sang Norma in London in 1952 Ernest Newman said Callas wasn't Ponselle....
Of course, Mme Callas' Norma is now hors de combat as far as a yardstick for the role is concerned. I was very fortunate to hear both Sutherland's and Caballe's first London Normas [Normi?], both were very valid interpretations, [and the Dame's diction was far better in the theatre than it's sometimes is on recordings], both had detractors, but their Normas are the ones I was impressed by. Later, Caballe sang the role at Covent Garden, [her first London Norma was at the Royal Festival Hall in 1971in a semi staged concert that worked brilliantly], and she seemed less comfortable i the role, then, a few days later Miss Bumbry offered her Norma to London, and was impressive in the character of Norma, even if there were a few comments about her actual singing in the role.
I lasted one act of Miss [M] Price's Norma, a role that she should not have attempted. It is a difficult opera to cast and to stage, [I have given up on it, I'm afraid, I wouldn't care if I never saw it again].
Think about this: I'm willing to lay a wager that if Pasta or Malibran were to sing Norma at The Met tonight, the audience would be hysterically rolling about in the aisles and many would have to be led out sobbing with uncontrollable laughter.
You know sometimes there are watershed years that mark a kind of changing of the guard. Periods where a lot of opera singers start to fade and new people come in to take their place. I think of 1976-77 as a watershed year for a lot of the great stars of the 1950's and 1960's. 1976 was the year we heard really the last of Corelli and Tebaldi. I also think that for Scotto, Caballé, Leontyne Price, Fiorenza Cossotto and Joan Sutherland it was the last year of their absolute vocal prime. By 1980 all were working with seriously diminished resources.
So whereas Caballé might have been a wonderful Norma in London in 1971, Orange in 1974 and the Met in 1976, by 1978 at Covent Garden she was past it.
Also, a lot of the legendary Normas weren't legendary for all that long. Callas had really only 8 years of greatness in the part for reasons we know all too well. Ponselle only sang the part for five or six seasons. She unveiled the role in 1927 and dropped it by 1932. John Ardoin got his hands on Marion Telva's score and discovered that she got through the part with cuts and transpositions sanctioned by Serafin. Renata Scotto was supposedly a wonderful Norma in Philadelphia (a small house) in the mid-seventies with Joann Grillo as Adalgisa but came to the Met in 1981 in tatters.
Even historically Giuditta Pasta pretty much peaked and declined with the premiere of Norma. Supposedly she was voiceless at the world premiere due to rehearsal fatigue but improved later in the run. However within a year or two, she was managing on interpretive insights and style rather than voice and was pretty much gone within two or three years. Giulia Grisi is pretty much the only soprano who really sang a great Norma for something like 20 or more years.
This post has been removed by the author.
Unfortunately I have real problems with GM's bitchy comments about Scotto. First of all, he was not there. (He was probably still in diapers or at least his training bra at that point) There was no broadcast of the performances and the house tapes that are floating around are of extremely poor quality. It is really easy to pontificate and bitch about a performance you were not at. I was at the second performance (MY FIRST NORMA) and you leave out a few important facts. First: Renata got booed viciously before she even opened her mouth on opening night by some demented Callas queens (including the nut job that use to come to the line with an old tape recorder of Callas recordings and blare them on the standing room line and who later tried to attack Renata with a shopping cart in the A & P) I was at the second performance. To say that she was unnerved and unhappy is an understatement. She felt as if she were fighting for her life. Her performances improved during the run. It wasn't that her voice was in tatters. It was that her nerves were in tatters from the cruel treatment from a small segment of the audience. The performances from Firenze and Houston are wonderful. I saw two other Normas. Verrett in Boston and Caballe in Macerata in 1985 in her last Norma. All three of them were well schooled bel canto singers who knew what they were doing. In the case of Verrett and Scotto, the sound may not have always been pretty (If you want pretty meaningless sound listen to Fleming, thank you very much) but these were great singers who knew what they were singing and understood the style of the music. If the instrument did not always meet the vocal demands, the entire performance was always moving and intelligent. Scotto,Verrett and Strats ,among others were complete performers who you had to experience live to fully appreciate their artistry. Recordings and videos and creaky house tapes are but a pale shadow of the impact these performers had on their audiences. To fully judge a performance you were not at based on radio broadcast (Dessay always sounds better on the radio then in thehouse ) or creaky private recordings shows a real lack of understanding of the art form. I enjoyed Papian's performance and would put in a similar league. This was a real performance, warts and all. The voice may not always be beautiful but she is a fine singer who did a very fine job in what is probably one of the most demanding roles in the repetoire. Many famous singers have had mixed results including Milanov. Besides, even though I like MG, I am pretty sure her performance will be a trian wreck, while Papian basically has the goods, and gave a performance that was wonderful even if it is not one that I would want to listen to in favor of Callas, Scotto, or Caballe.
The previous comments are mine-paddypig. Blog won't let me sign in under my handle
Best thread in a while. I do not think that the Met should be commended for mounting ANY opera (much less Norma) with just whatever resources happen to be at hand. Evenhanded is absolutely right about Zajick's vocal inappropriateness - it reminds me of the reviews of the semi-famous Adalgisa of Eva Podles several years ago (in Seattle?) - she was apparently golden-age amazing and compelling - but nevertheless wrong wrong wrong as the young initiate. The reviews of Christine Goerke's Norma's were more mixed - but she has a beautiful, large, voluptuous sound I've always admired. What about her as Norma?
If Papian is the Norma of the moment, the opera world is in crisis
Oh, please. Just because a third-rate bit of rum-ti-tum organ grinder's music can't be properly sung today isn't a cause for "a crisis". Opera as an art form will somehow struggle along if Norma drops from the standard repertoire.
some demented Callas queens (including the nut job that use to come to the line with an old tape recorder of Callas recordings and blare them on the standing room line and who later tried to attack Renata with a shopping cart in the A & P)
Terrence McNally, paging Terrence McNally, there's the kernel for a new play awaiting you......
What, may I ask, is an A&P? [For those of us who are not natives of New York.]
A&P is a grocery store chain. I believe the name comes from the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company.
As far as the performance goes, I was quite pleasantly surprised by everyone's singing. I wasn't sure what to expect going into the evening. Papian's voice had a beautiful shimmer to it. Yes, one might appreciate more drama, but she gave a committed performance. I can't imagine anyone else alive and currently singing giving a better performance than Papian did.
Farina sang the best I've ever heard him. Granted I haven't heard him that many times, but the times I did hear him, he left a negative impression.
For what it's worth, I think it was one of the better performances I've seen at the Met lately.
What, may I ask, is an A&P?
i have heard a tape of Podles' Adalgisa from seattle. it's incongruous to hear such a deep, earthy, powerful voice as this girlish virginal priestess. while i love Podles' voice, it's not what Adalgisa should sound like.
The A & P was a chain of grocery stores throughout the northeast. They have now been renamed Food Emporium in the city and I believe Walbaums in the bridge and tunnel areas. There was one on broadway, I believe it is where the SONY cinemas are now.Yes Terrence would use anything with Maria to create a play. I don't know who has desecrated her memory more, Mc Nally or Zeffirelli with Callas Forever.
I've also heard Podles's Adalgisa. It's impressive but not at all ideal. However, if Zajick were to sing Norma, I'd want Podles as her Adalgisa. Adalgisa sings a third below Norma for so many passages that one would need a voice that could be an anchor for those harmonies.
Thank you to those who explained about the food store initials. Much appreciated.
Talking about current Normas: Frankfurt Opera has booked austrian singer Silvana Dussmann for a run of concert performances, she already did sing dozens of Normas in the actual Berlin production. She is a brillian Empress in Frau ohne Schatten and may perhaps lack italianitá - but has a big, flexible voice with all the messa di voce and commend of fioritura you could wish for. Never been at the MET.
Paddy I really like your "anonymous post" about Scotto. Just another example of a great artist being reduced to a one line bitchy remark that is only one queen's opinion anyhow. I often enjoy the bitchiness but its nice to be reminded its really a bit unreal.
"But the line of great Sieglindes stop with Rysanek, of course."
My most memoralbe Sieglinde was none other than Birgit N. It was a one-night-only affair at the Met, when she sang S. to Rita Hunter's Brünhilde.
(Of course Sieglinde had been B.N.'s Met début rôle.)
Paddy--
It doesn't matter whether the Scotto's Norma fell short because she was in bad vocal form, unsuited to the role, or beset by aliens prior to opening: From an audience perspective, all that counted was the level of the performance--and it was dreadful. I personally feel the role didn't suit her: It was much too weighty an assignment for a singer who was in essence a (superb) Gilda and Adina pushed out of her fach. I've been listening to an earlier Scotto Norma, from 1978, in Florence, under Muti. The voice is definitely in better shape there: It doesn't sound like air-raid siren on sustained notes, for instance. But the interpretation is not impressive: In order to compensate for her basic unsuitability, she has to overplay the vehement aspects of the role. It's all played at the edge; there's never a sense of power in reserve. She barks out "sediziosi voci." At "tremi tu," she isn't scary--just shrewish. When Addison deWitt said to Eve Harrington "You're too small for that gesture," he might have had Scotto's Norma in mind.
Post a Comment
<< Home