Bobby takes one for the team
So, was last night a triumph or a disaster? Well, it was neither since the role of Radames doesn't play to all of Roberto AlagnaWas Alagna overparted or inaudible? Not at all. Really in some ways the role of Radames is easier than Romeo
Oddly enough, despite its reputation as being a "robusto" tenor role, the part of Radames has long stretches of lyrical singing. "Celeste Aida" is a love song, not a call to arms. The Temple Scene is prayerful, the Nile scene love duet is romantic and impetuous. The Tomb Scene also requires lyricism and pianos. I think that Karajan or somebody told Carreras (or was it Pavarotti?) that the only phrase that requires real dramatic declamation is the last phrase of the Nile scene "Sacerdote, io resto a te!".
In the best lyric Radames tradition (think Gigli, Bjorling and Pavarotti - though not quite in their league) Alagna treated "Celeste Aida" as a love song sung mostly mezza voce with a lot of sensitive coloring and phrasing. He hit the final B flat forte and repeated the phrase softly an octave lower as Richard Tucker did for Toscanini.
It helped that he had the most romantic appearance of any Radames since Corelli. In the first scene he was bare-chested (and looking slimmer than he did last year at La Scala) with a gold metallic collar, cape tucked around his shoulders, gold arm bands and leather peplum and gold sandals (not elevator sandals as he wore at La Scala). He looked very sexy with nice pecs with just the right amount of chest hair. The applause at the end of the aria seemed to please Roberto no end and he smiled joyously at the audience and seemed to feel vindicated and happy to have a chance to put last year's disaster behind him.
Then he made the first of a few musical mistakes (understandable given the circumstances) in the duet with Amneris before Aida goes on. (This is the same piece of music that marked his exit at La Scala) Dolora and the conductor got him back on track and things went quite well from there on. Alagna was occasionally covered by Dolora but reached a pretty good balance with Angela M. Brown.
His lack of an easy and integrated piano was a problem in the Temple Scene which was just okay. His contribution to the Triumphal Scene was solid but Radames doesn't have much to do there. The Nile Scene had his biggest challenges and most distinctive successes. Alagna's top carried him well in this scene ringing out reliably though his lower range can get grainy and woolly-sounding. The duet with Aida was full of interesting nuances and verbal expression that many Radames miss or ignore. Here finally he got some nice diminuendos. The final outburst to Ramfis was broad-phrased and ringing with a prolonged final note.
The "Gia i sacerdoti adunansi" duet with Amneris was well-done though Dolora definitely held back a bit for him and both she and Roberto got out of sync with the conductor. The final "A Terra Addio" duet with Angela Brown was some of his best singing of the evening matched by Brown, both spinning out gorgeous piano phrases. He didn't seem tired at the end and gained strength as he went on.
He acted more than most Radames do and he was visually credible as the romantic bone of contention between two passionate women (less so as a warrior and leader of men). However, the role still is two dimensional and more complex, vulnerable heros like Romeo, Rodolfo in Boheme and Des Grieux in Manon show better what Alagna can do as an actor. His timbre is a little odd-sounding in Verdi. It has a white wine quality - a combination of bright-toned forward tartness on the top with a hint of fruity mellowness below that is ideal for French repertoire but a little exotic in standard Italian opera.
The whole performance was a refreshing change of pace from business-as-usual tenor bombast and highlighted qualities in the role that are often missed. Was it ideal?, was it what we are used to? No. But it was interesting and I mean that in a good way.
Ms. Brown has all the vocal attributes of a great Aida but couldn't pull together an even line as she moved from high to low or forte to piano or declamatory to legato. Whenever she had to change pace (which is often in this demanding role) Brown had a momentary loss of vocal control and focus while the voice changed dynamics or register. This meant that unsettled phrases were then followed by swaths of gorgeous tone. But the bumps did take their toll, particularly on the high C in "O Patria Mia" which started to go badly awry and then was truncated.
Dolora was the pro she is and has been for a very long time giving more vulnerable colors to Amneris but still sounding the brass when needed. Dobber had a handsome compact tone and suave phrasing as Amonasro with a nice mahogany finish to the timbre but also needed a bit more bite - Di Luna might suit him better. Kowaljow was sonorous and solid as Ramfis and Reinhard Hagen had a pleasing but somewhat unimposing debut as the King. Ono does better with the orchestra players than he does with the singers and lacks the slancio and dramatic phrasing that Italians have in their blood in this music. He is a very intelligent musician and, once again, this wasn't a routine reading of the score. -- Gualtier Maldè
Labels: alagna, gualtier malde, met, review











35 Comments:
Well I just couldn't wait to hear Miss Brown...boy was I disappointed. The voice was big and fluttery. Despite it's size it didn't seem to have a solid core. The acting left a lot to be desired too.
Mr.Alagna's unfortunate first act turned into a kick-ass performance by acts 2,3 & 4. I still hate his voice though.
Why am I even bothering to talk about anybody else - IT IS ALWAYS ABOUT AMERNERIS FOR ME! and La Zajick did not disappoint. DAMN! That woman just gets better and better each time I see her.
Oh and the Amonasro wasn't bad.
Based on what I heard (not saw), I think this review is spot on and I think the performance demonstrates his vocal estate has improved.
That sharping on top has plagued him his entire career, it seems like something that could have been fixed.
Hmm... I don't think I'd like to be covered by Dolora Zajick. Not even occasionally.
Oh and as a friend put it last night...Alagna's chest wig looked nice.
I know that we who have seen umpteenth performances of this opera (and those who have studied or are professionals) tend to get into the technical minutiae of performances, but I attended with a co-worker who is new to opera and she was blown away by it. Yes she has only been attending opera for 2 seasons, but she has become a diehard fan and that to me is what really matters about last night's performance. She was actually debating whether or not to shell out for Aida. She has purchased tickets to 12 performances this season.
Was it a good night at the opera? Yes overall.
Now that's how you write an opera review! I'm very happy for Alagna.
Gualtier -
What an incredible review! Thanks for sharing, and putting your thoughts into such eloquent words. I listened with rapt attention on Sirius and find myself in total agreement with your comments. Your dissection of Alagna's vocal attributes was particularly spot on. I would have been a bit harder on Brown who I feel is mediocre at best. With Giordani fielding such a success as Pinky and now Alagna's showing last night, I bet the MET hopes the one-dimensional, uninteresting Berti STAYS indisposed. Why not just promote Costello for all remaining performances of Lucia and call it DONE!
Thanks for posting an intelligent, thoughtful review. It was clearly much better in the house than on Sirius. Celeste Aida had some painful moments, even with that clarion high note. That intonation problem doesn't go away and he doesn't seem motivated to improve it. He's a first-class actor and I'm glad he had a success, if not a triumph. Please someone sign him for Hoffman. Zajic was clearly the star of the show and nycoq, it's all about Amneris for me, too. Angela Brown disappointed--she was so compelling here in Margaret Garner--she stole the show from Denyce Graves. The tone was unfocused and wobbly much of the time.
Best review than any music critic's
I've seen. I attended the opening night of Aida and Brown was glorious. Last night on Sirius, she sounded more "tentative" and the coloring and size of her voice were diminished. Maybe she had a bad day, like any other singer.
In the photo that accompanied the excellent "Aida" writeup, Alagna's Mediterranean looks serve him well.
Nice to know that this substitution worked out well for the tenor and the audience.
Was Angela in the audience?
When I asked if Angela was in the audience, I wasn't talking about the evening's Aida. ; ))
god knows she ain't got nothin' else to do :)
Well, it was a shame that La Cieca wasn't there because Angela did accompany her husband out of the theater (around 1 a.m.) looking sleek in very tight jeans and boots. Angela was chatty with fans and when asked if she is ever going to sing the Massenet Manon, replied that she prefers the Puccini. She has sung neither though she has recorded the Massenet superbly with her husband.
Another visitor to the dressing room: baby tenor dreamboat and Parterre Box obsession Stephen Costello.
Also: Alagna personally confirmed that he is singing two Romeos in December (the 12th and 15th) including the crucial Saturday matinee radio and movie theater broadcast. That leaves December 8th and December 20th to be filled in. Let's have two new tenors on each date so that Anna N can fall in love with five different tenors this year.
gualtier malde--
Terrific review...you really put the so-called "professionals" to shame...
I know it's hard to keep track but if have two different Romeos on those two dates that will make SIX for the season!!!...don't forget Polenzani for the last 2 performances...
Would Gualtier care to elaborate on what exactly constitutes "just the right amount of chest hair"?
Gualtier -
So that was her that I saw in the lobby. The jeans made me think it wasn't her. She's got a great ass!Plus she and her friend were talking photos like they were tourists. Not that there is anything wrong with tourists.
Again I say, why do we have to suffer through the reviews of the likes of Tommassini when there are people like you & La Cieca out there?
The Associated Press's coverage (including a midnight interview with the tenor) is at http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gQ5PAoDM3hIrr26v28uleZy2WtNQD8SB2GK00
Gaultier is a MUCH better critic/observer than is the AP's writer (and Opera Chic is linking to his Parterre writeup).
Alagna's Radames at Orange last year was a harbinger of trouble ahead, which duly came at La Scala. I agree that Radames is essentially a lyric role - Bergonzi was really wonderful in the role - but Alagna has not sung it as such. He has consistently attempted to push towards the heroic and he is destroying his voice. Here it sounds as if he has decided to sing from his strengths. But he is still singing Manrico here, there and everywhere...
He was the greatest French lyric of his generation but he wanted to be up there with the 'big boys' - what one might call the 'Carreras syndrome'.
Thanks for the really excellent review.
Is it my imagination or has La Cieca swapped photos of our Radames since earlier this afternoon?
RA has lost his chest hair, the makeup is different, his headpiece is gone, etc.
Sharp-eyed jf: You are correct. The photo now in place is from last night's performance.
wow..he looks hot....just like I like 'em, a bit on the short side...yumm...
Thanks, La C, for confirming that the Radames photo did change.
Now about that "be still my heart" photo of Michael Slattery as Monteverdi's Orfeo on p. 47 of the Nov 2007 Opera News... is that kid cute or what?
is that kid cute or what?
JF in DC - ask Thomas Hampson. He looks rather pleased:
http://www.michaelslattery.com/download/hampsonslattery.jpg
i was obviously born too late, because i can't get too excited about dolora zajick. i have seen her twice at the met, and yes, she's phenomenal, she's a vocal hurricane, i liked her eboli and santuzza, but the quality of the voice is not rich and colorful, it's rather "white" and somewhat lacking in distinctiveness. volume she has plenty, but that's about it.
i haven't heard brown live, but in one tape i have (hunter college recital), the voice sounds huge but totally out-of-control.
do the costumes for radames change depending on the singer? i don't recall that botha was shirtless when he sang it.
and what the heck is a peplum?
I totally disagree about your thoughts on DoloraZ, Ms. Creant. I think she's one of the best singers alive. Her sound, while bright, is not "white". It is a vibrant, steely, amazing instrument. Everyone is so used to Renay that they think wooly means colorful. Well, it doesn't. DZ ROCKS.
Great review! I was there and agree, for the most part. I heard a bit of a flutter, not big enough to call a wobble, in Celeste Aïda that worried me. But, like this review said, he got a lot better. He sang a lot of the opera parked in front of the conductor, which is perfectly understandable, and managed some decent acting for someone who doesn't know this staging well. Sometimes in the larger ensembles he was drowned out a bit (though I was in the acoustically problematic rush seats, almost under the side overhang).
I realize in retrospect that this was a smart move by Alagna. He sang it with one or two days' notice; no one can criticize him much without looking mean. And he was credible, if not triumphant.
I'll be at Butterfly this Friday. I don't think he needs an elevator between these two roles, maybe a few flights of stairs at the most.
winpal said...
JF in DC - ask Thomas Hampson. He looks rather pleased:
uh-huh... thanks for the URL, winpal!
In his Edith Head Yul-Ramses costume his bellybutton is covered by his belt, not like that Brit Spears garb he was in in La Scala
I'm sure that Alagna insists that he go on shirtless. And why not? Few people can sing Radames and sport a good bod.
What I don't understand is why the leading newspapers of this country can't hire "Gualtier Malde" to write opera reviews instead of the hacks wasting good trees to publish their inane and meaningless dribble. What passes for music criticism these days is a disgrace. Bravo Gualtier!
After Cossotto's and Toczyska's reign, there has been no better Amneris that Zajick. The enormous power and dramatic expression of her voice are overwhelming. I don't undrestand some negative comments about her voice. I saw her at the opening night of Aida at the Met, and for the first time I realized- as some have said- why this opera could have been easily named "Amneris" instead. Zajick, in her 50s, is still a powerhouse and the Amneris of our time, with no peers at the present. She is the most famous mezzo whom the recording indusry has underrated and ignored, which, to me, is a puzzle.
chacun a son gout, i guess... i should clarify, as i said above, i did find zajick exciting, but i guess i didn't find the quality of the voice and the tone to be rich and beautiful (compared to let's say, troyanos, bumbry, verrett -- but then i have never heard these ladies live as amneris). but that's just my taste.
I would much rather hear Borodina as Amneris than Zajick. What a rich, beautiful, sexy voice Olga has.
i did hear borodina as amneris at the met. i must say, it's a gorgeous, lush, rich, deep wine-colored contralto voice -- but amneris and eboli are wrong for her. she lacks the temperament and the high notes (which she cuts short) for such dramatic parts.
If this was your first time seeing Angela Brown, I suggest you give it another try. She was singing sick that night - unannounced, but still ill - and it was not representative of what she normally delivers.
Post a Comment
<< Home